K-PIPA
South Korea's stringent personal data protection regulation
AS9120B
Aerospace standard for distributors' quality management systems.
Quick Verdict
K-PIPA mandates stringent data privacy for Korean data handlers worldwide with consent and breach rules, while AS9120B is a voluntary QMS certification for aerospace distributors ensuring traceability and counterfeit prevention. Organizations adopt K-PIPA for legal compliance, AS9120B for market access.
K-PIPA
Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)
Key Features
- Mandates independent Chief Privacy Officers for all handlers
- Requires granular explicit consent for sensitive data
- Enforces 72-hour breach notifications to subjects
- Applies extraterritorially to foreign entities targeting Koreans
- Imposes fines up to 3% of annual global revenue
AS9120B
AS9120B Quality Management Systems for Distributors
Key Features
- Counterfeit and suspected unapproved parts prevention
- Traceability and chain-of-custody controls for split lots
- Risk-based external provider evaluation and monitoring
- Configuration management via sales order records
- Enhanced product safety and ethical awareness training
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
K-PIPA Details
What It Is
K-PIPA, or Personal Information Protection Act, is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal information by public and private entities. Scope covers domestic and foreign handlers processing Korean residents' data, emphasizing consent-centric, risk-based approach with extraterritorial reach.
Key Components
- Core principles: transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accountability via mandatory Chief Privacy Officers (CPOs).
- Obligations: granular consents, security measures (encryption, access controls), data subject rights (access, erasure, portability within 10 days).
- Breach response: 72-hour notifications; cross-border transfers need consent or certifications like ISMS-P.
- Enforcement by PIPC with fines up to 3% revenue.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal compliance avoids massive fines (e.g., Google's KRW 70B); builds trust in privacy-sensitive market; enables EU adequacy for data flows; reduces breach risks through CPO governance and audits.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, CPO appointment, consent tools, security upgrades, training. Applies to all data handlers, especially large entities; no certification but PIPC guidelines and audits recommended. Typical for multinationals targeting Korea.
AS9120B Details
What It Is
AS9120B is the IAQG quality management system standard for aviation, space, and defense distributors. It augments ISO 9001:2015's high-level structure with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements. Primary purpose: ensure traceability, prevent counterfeits, and maintain product conformity in distribution without altering parts. Adopts a risk-based thinking approach via PDCA cycle.
Key Components
- Core clauses 4-10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Distributor emphases: counterfeit prevention, traceability (including split lots), supplier controls, configuration management, preservation.
- Built on ISO 9001; certification via accredited bodies with OASIS registration.
Why Organizations Use It
- Commercial necessity for OEM/Tier-1 supply chains.
- Mitigates risks like traceability loss, counterfeits.
- Builds customer trust, enables market access (2,442 global certifications).
- Drives efficiency, reduces nonconformities.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months typical).
- Targets distributors globally; suits ISO-experienced firms.
- Requires Stage 1/2 certification audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | K-PIPA | AS9120B |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection, consent, rights, breaches | Aerospace distribution QMS, traceability, counterfeit prevention |
| Industry | All sectors processing Korean data, global reach | Aerospace parts distributors, aviation/space/defense |
| Nature | Mandatory data privacy law, PIPC enforcement | Voluntary QMS certification standard, IAQG oversight |
| Testing | CPO audits, breach assessments, no mandatory DPIAs | Internal audits, management reviews, third-party certification |
| Penalties | Fines up to 3% revenue, criminal sanctions | Loss of certification, supply chain exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about K-PIPA and AS9120B
K-PIPA FAQ
AS9120B FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence
Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
DORA vs ISO 27701
Compare DORA vs ISO 27701: Financial resilience meets privacy mastery. Ensure EU compliance, ICT risk control & PII governance. Uncover diffs & synergies now!
NIST CSF vs PIPL
Compare NIST CSF vs PIPL: Align U.S. cybersecurity framework with China's data privacy law. Uncover key diffs, governance tips & global compliance wins. Explore now!
BRC vs ISO 17025
Compare BRC vs ISO 17025: Decode food safety certification & lab competence standards. Boost compliance, cut risks & unlock markets—find your best fit today!