What is the primary objective of **K-PIPA**?

**K-PIPA's primary objective is to protect personal information of Korean residents by preventing loss, theft, leakage, and misuse while ensuring data subject rights and promoting international cooperation.** Enacted September 30, 2011, with key amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024, it mandates transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, and explicit consent as the core lawful basis for processing personal, sensitive (e.g., health, biometrics), and unique identification information (e.g., resident registration numbers).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **K-PIPA**?

**All data handlers—domestic and foreign entities processing personal information of Korean residents—must comply with K-PIPA.** This includes controllers and processors (outsourcees) handling identifiable data, with extraterritorial reach for foreign operators targeting Koreans via services, monitoring, or substantial impact per 2024 PIPC Guidelines. All must appoint Chief Privacy Officers (CPOs), with qualified CPOs required for large entities (e.g., KRW 150B+ revenue or high sensitive data volumes).

Does **K-PIPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**K-PIPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for private entities, though public institutions require file registration and DPIAs.** Handlers must conduct internal audits via CPOs, implement security per 2024 PIPC Guidelines (encryption, access controls), and pursue voluntary certifications like ISMS-P for cross-border transfers. Processors face oversight through controller contracts.

How often should an assessment for **K-PIPA** be performed?

**K-PIPA assessments, including risk evaluations and security audits overseen by CPOs, should be performed regularly, with annual executive/board reporting mandated for independence.** No fixed frequency is prescribed, but breach response, data mapping, and compliance reviews must support 72-hour notifications and ongoing obligations like access logs (1+ year retention). Large entities notify PIPC periodically for high volumes.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **K-PIPA**?

**Non-compliance with K-PIPA incurs fines up to 3% of annual revenue (capped at KRW 3 billion ≈ €2.1M), surcharges up to 5x damages, corrective orders, and criminal penalties up to 5 years imprisonment.** PIPC enforces via investigations; examples include Google's KRW 70B ($50M) and Meta's KRW 30B fines in 2022. CPO absence fines reach KRW 10M-30M.

Can **K-PIPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, K-PIPA aligns closely with GDPR principles like transparency, data minimization, and subject rights, securing EU adequacy on December 17, 2021.** Mappings support cross-border flows via PIPC-recognized certifications (e.g., ISMS-P), though K-PIPA emphasizes consent primacy, CPO mandates, and 72-hour subject notifications over GDPR's legitimate interests and DPIAs.

What is the first step to begin implementing **K-PIPA**?

**The first step for K-PIPA implementation is appointing a qualified Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) with independence, resources, and board-reporting duties.** Follow with gap analysis via data mapping/inventory, granular consent mechanisms, and privacy policies in Korean, prioritizing high-risk areas like sensitive data and cross-border transfers.

What is the primary objective of **FERPA**?

**FERPA’s primary objective is to protect the privacy of parents and students by regulating access to and disclosure of personally identifiable information (PII) in education records.** Enacted in 1974 as section 444 of the General Education Provisions Act (20 U.S.C. § 1232g) with regulations at 34 CFR Part 99, it grants rights to inspect records within **45 days** (§99.10), seek amendments for inaccurate/misleading content (§99.20), and control disclosures via signed consent specifying records, purpose, and recipients (§99.30), balanced by enumerated exceptions (§99.31).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **FERPA**?

**FERPA applies to educational agencies or institutions receiving funds under programs administered by the U.S. Secretary of Education.** This includes public K-12 districts, most postsecondary institutions via student aid like Pell Grants (§99.1(c)), and applies institution-wide to all components (§99.1(d)). Rights holders are parents of minors and **eligible students** (age 18+ or postsecondary attendees), with rights transferring upon eligibility (§99.5).

Does **FERPA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, FERPA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** Compliance is demonstrated through internal controls like annual notifications (§99.7), disclosure recordkeeping (§99.32), and procedural adherence. The Department of Education’s Family Policy Compliance Office investigates complaints (§99.63), but institutions self-govern via policies, access controls, and vendor contracts under the school official exception (§99.31(a)(1)(i)(B)).

How often should an assessment for **FERPA** be performed?

**FERPA requires annual notifications of rights to parents/eligible students (§99.7(a)), but does not specify assessment frequency.** Institutions should conduct regular internal reviews of data inventories, access controls, disclosure logs, and vendor compliance, aligned with operational needs like access reviews (e.g., monthly for high-risk roles) and audits to ensure ongoing adherence to timelines like **45-day** record access (§99.10).

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **FERPA**?

**Non-compliance can result in Department of Education enforcement, including withholding federal funds, cease-and-desist orders, or termination of funding eligibility (§99.67(a)).** Complaints are filed with the Family Policy Compliance Office within **180 days** (§99.64(c)); third-party violators face **five-year** PII access bans (§99.67(c)–(e)). No private right of action exists, but reputational harm and remediation follow investigations.

Can **FERPA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, FERPA’s elements like PII protection, consent, and access rights can be mapped to frameworks such as GDPR or CCPA, though FERPA is U.S.-specific.** Core alignments include data minimization, purpose limitation (§99.30), and recordkeeping (§99.32), but FERPA lacks data subject erasure rights and emphasizes funding-conditioned applicability (§99.1) over direct fines.

What is the first step to begin implementing **FERPA**?

**The first step is publishing an annual notification of FERPA rights to parents/eligible students (§99.7(a)).** This must detail inspection/amendment procedures, consent rules, complaint processes, and—if used—**school official** and **legitimate educational interest** criteria (§99.7(a)(3)), delivered via means reasonably likely to inform (§99.7(b)).

K-PIPA vs FERPA

Standards Comparison

K-PIPA

Mandatory

2011

South Korea's stringent personal data protection regulation

FERPA

Mandatory

1974

U.S. regulation protecting privacy of student education records.

Quick Verdict

K-PIPA mandates strict consent and security for all Korean data handlers globally, while FERPA protects US student records via access rights and disclosure limits for funded schools. Companies adopt K-PIPA for Korean compliance, FERPA to safeguard education data and retain funding.

Data Privacy

K-PIPA

Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Mandates independent Chief Privacy Officers universally
Requires granular explicit consent for transfers
Enforces 72-hour breach notifications to subjects
Applies extraterritorially to Korean-targeting foreigners
Imposes fines up to 3% annual revenue

Student Privacy

FERPA

Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act of 1974

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Rights to inspect, amend, and consent for education records
Expansive PII definition including linkable indirect identifiers
Disclosure exceptions for school officials and emergencies
Mandatory annual notifications of rights and procedures
Recordkeeping requirements for all PII disclosures

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

K-PIPA Details

What It Is

K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's flagship data protection regulation, enacted in 2011 with key amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and deletion of personal information by public/private entities, including extraterritorial reach for foreign handlers targeting Koreans. Adopts a consent-centric, risk-based approach emphasizing transparency and accountability.

Key Components

Mandatory CPOs with independence for compliance oversight
Granular consent for sensitive data, marketing, transfers
Data subject rights (access, erasure, portability) in 10 days
Security safeguards per 2024 Guidelines (encryption, logs)
Breach notifications within 72 hours; PIPC enforcement with 3% revenue fines Built on principles like purpose limitation, minimization; no mandatory DPIAs for private sector.

Why Organizations Use It

Ensures legal compliance avoiding multimillion fines (e.g., Google KRW 70B). Builds stakeholder trust, enables EU adequacy flows, mitigates risks via audits. Offers competitive edge in Korea's privacy-sensitive market through robust governance.

Implementation Overview

**Phased roadmapgap analysis, CPO appointment, technical controls (encryption), DSR portals, breach playbooks. Applies to all data handlers processing Korean residents' data; ISMS-P certification aids transfers. No formal certification but PIPC guidelines/audits required. (178 words)

FERPA Details

What It Is

FERPA (Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act), codified at 20 U.S.C. §1232g and 34 CFR Part 99, is a U.S. federal regulation. It safeguards student education records and PII for institutions receiving federal funds. Adopts a rights-based approach with consent rules and exceptions for operational needs.

Key Components

Rights: inspect/review within 45 days, amend inaccurate records, consent to disclosures.
Definitions: broad education records, expansive PII (linkable identifiers), directory information.
Disclosures: consent default, exceptions (school officials/LEI, emergencies, audits).
Obligations: annual notices, disclosure logs, hearings. No certification; DOE enforcement.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for federal funding eligibility, avoids penalties.
Manages privacy risks, ensures vendor compliance.
Builds trust with students/parents, enables edtech innovation.
Supports risk-based data governance.

Implementation Overview

Phased: governance, data inventory, policies/training, RBAC/logging, vendor DPAs. For K-12/postsecondary U.S. schools. Internal audits; DOE complaints trigger reviews. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	K-PIPA	FERPA
Scope	Personal data processing, consent, security	Student education records, PII privacy
Industry	All sectors, South Korea residents globally	Educational institutions receiving US funds
Nature	Mandatory national law, PIPC enforcement	Mandatory federal law, funding-based enforcement
Testing	CPO audits, security guidelines compliance	Access controls, disclosure logging reviews
Penalties	3% revenue fines, imprisonment up to 5 years	Federal funding loss, corrective orders

Scope

K-PIPA

Personal data processing, consent, security

FERPA

Student education records, PII privacy

Industry

K-PIPA

All sectors, South Korea residents globally

FERPA

Educational institutions receiving US funds

Nature

K-PIPA

Mandatory national law, PIPC enforcement

FERPA

Mandatory federal law, funding-based enforcement

Testing

K-PIPA

CPO audits, security guidelines compliance

FERPA

Access controls, disclosure logging reviews

Penalties

K-PIPA

3% revenue fines, imprisonment up to 5 years

FERPA

Federal funding loss, corrective orders

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about K-PIPA and FERPA

K-PIPA FAQ

FERPA FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA

Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPL vs AS9100

PIPL vs AS9100: Compare China's strict data privacy law with aerospace's elite QMS standard. Unlock compliance strategies, risks & implementation for global ops now!

CMMC vs PDPA

Discover CMMC vs PDPA: DoD cybersecurity maturity vs Asia's data privacy laws. Compare levels, controls, pitfalls & strategies for global compliance. Secure ops now!

IEC 62443 vs AS9110C

Discover IEC 62443 vs AS9110C: Compare IACS cybersecurity standards with aerospace MRO quality systems. Unlock synergies for secure, compliant OT resilience. Dive in now!

K-PIPA

FERPA

Quick Verdict

K-PIPA

Key Features

FERPA

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

K-PIPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

FERPA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

K-PIPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of K-PIPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with K-PIPA?

Does K-PIPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for K-PIPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with K-PIPA?

Can K-PIPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing K-PIPA?

FERPA FAQ

What is the primary objective of FERPA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with FERPA?

Does FERPA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for FERPA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with FERPA?

Can FERPA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing FERPA?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA

Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

PIPL vs AS9100

CMMC vs PDPA

IEC 62443 vs AS9110C