K-PIPA
South Korea's stringent regulation for personal data protection
ISO 14064
International standard for GHG quantification, reporting, and verification.
Quick Verdict
K-PIPA mandates strict data privacy for Korean operations with heavy fines, while ISO 14064 voluntarily standardizes GHG accounting for global credibility. Companies adopt K-PIPA for legal compliance in Korea; ISO 14064 for verifiable sustainability reporting and market trust.
K-PIPA
Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)
Key Features
- Mandates independent Chief Privacy Officers for all handlers
- Requires granular explicit consent for sensitive processing
- Enforces 72-hour breach notifications to subjects
- Applies extraterritorially to foreign entities targeting Koreans
- Imposes fines up to 3% of annual global revenue
ISO 14064
ISO 14064: Greenhouse gases specification and guidance
Key Features
- Three-part modular structure for inventories, projects, assurance
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy
- Defines Scope 1-3 organizational boundaries and quantification
- Supports project baselines, additionality, and monitoring
- Enables independent validation/verification statements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
K-PIPA Details
What It Is
K-PIPA, or Personal Information Protection Act, is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and destruction of personal information by public and private entities. Scope covers domestic and foreign handlers processing Korean residents' data, emphasizing consent-centric, risk-based principles like transparency, minimization, and accountability.
Key Components
- Core pillars: consent management, security safeguards, data subject rights, cross-border transfers.
- Mandates Chief Privacy Officers (CPOs), granular consents, encryption, access controls.
- Built on GDPR-aligned principles but with stricter consent primacy, no private DPIAs.
- Enforced by PIPC via fines up to 3% revenue, corrective orders, criminal sanctions.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal compliance avoids massive fines (e.g., Google's $50M). Enhances trust, enables EU adequacy data flows, supports AI/innovation via pseudonymization. Builds competitive edge in privacy-sensitive markets, mitigates breach risks through rapid notifications.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, CPO appointment, policy development, technical controls, training, audits. Applies to all data handlers, especially large entities. No certification but PIPC guidelines, ISMS-P for transfers; requires Korean policies, 10-day rights responses.
ISO 14064 Details
What It Is
ISO 14064 is an international standard series (ISO 14064-1:2018, -2:2019, -3:2019) for greenhouse gas (GHG) quantification, reporting, and verification. It provides a modular framework for organizations and projects, emphasizing principle-based accounting.
Key Components
- Three parts: Part 1 (organizational inventories), Part 2 (project reductions/removals), Part 3 (validation/verification).
- Five core principles: relevance, completeness, consistency, transparency, accuracy.
- Scope 1-3 emissions classification, boundary setting, uncertainty management.
- Supports third-party assurance, no formal certification but verification statements.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets regulatory demands (e.g., CSRD, SB-253), enables carbon markets.
- Builds investor trust, reduces greenwashing risks.
- Drives operational efficiencies, supply-chain engagement.
- Enhances competitiveness in ESG disclosures.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: governance, boundary design, data systems, verification.
- Applies to all sizes/industries; complex for Scope 3-heavy firms.
- Involves cross-functional teams, software tools, optional ISO 14065-accredited verifiers. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | K-PIPA | ISO 14064 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection and privacy | GHG emissions quantification and reporting |
| Industry | All sectors handling Korean data | All sectors with GHG emissions |
| Nature | Mandatory national law with fines | Voluntary international standard |
| Testing | CPO audits and breach reporting | Independent GHG verification audits |
| Penalties | 3% revenue fines, imprisonment | No legal penalties, certification loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about K-PIPA and ISO 14064
K-PIPA FAQ
ISO 14064 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook
Top 10 NIST CSF 2.0 Myths Busted: Separating Hype from Reality for Smarter Adoption
Bust 10 NIST CSF 2.0 myths like 'only for critical infrastructure' or 'Govern replaces Identify'. Plain-English breakdowns, evidence, and fixes for flexible ris
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 45001 vs ISO 31000
Unlock ISO 45001 vs ISO 31000: OH&S management vs risk guidelines. Compare PDCA clauses, leadership focus, integration benefits—boost safety & resilience now.
NIST CSF vs ISO 28000
Discover NIST CSF vs ISO 28000: Cyber risk framework meets supply chain security std. Compare structures, benefits & use cases to pick the best for resilience today.
LGPD vs ISO 45001
Compare LGPD vs ISO 45001: Brazil's data privacy law meets global OH&S standard. Unlock compliance synergies, risk insights, and strategies for seamless multinational alignment. Dive in!