K-PIPA
South Korea's stringent regulation for personal data protection
ISO 20000
International standard for service management systems
Quick Verdict
K-PIPA mandates strict data privacy for Korean operations with consent and breach rules, while ISO 20000 certifies voluntary service management excellence. Companies adopt K-PIPA for legal compliance in Korea; ISO 20000 for operational reliability and market trust.
K-PIPA
South Korea's Personal Information Protection Act
Key Features
- Mandatory CPO with independence and board reporting
- Granular explicit consent for sensitive data transfers
- 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and regulators
- Extraterritorial reach for foreign entities targeting Koreans
- Revenue-based fines up to 3% of global annual revenue
ISO 20000
ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 Service management system requirements
Key Features
- Annex SL structure for ISO integration
- Full service lifecycle operational controls
- PDCA-driven continual improvement
- Certifiable SMS with leadership accountability
- Flexible for ITIL, DevOps, multi-supplier
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
K-PIPA Details
What It Is
K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation, enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and deletion of personal, sensitive, and unique identification information by domestic and foreign data handlers targeting Korean residents. Adopting a consent-centric, risk-based approach with extraterritorial scope, it emphasizes transparency, purpose limitation, and data minimization.
Key Components
- Core principles: explicit granular consent, CPO mandates, security safeguards per 2024 Guidelines.
- Data subject rights: access, rectification, erasure, portability, objection to automated decisions (10-day responses).
- Breach response: 72-hour notifications; cross-border transfers via consent or certifications like ISMS-P.
- Enforcement by PIPC with fines up to 3% revenue; no formal certification but compliance via audits and CPOs.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal obligation for data handlers; mitigates high fines (e.g., Google's KRW 70B); builds trust in privacy-sensitive market; enables EU adequacy data flows; supports innovation via pseudonymization.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, CPO appointment, data mapping, PbD controls, training, vendor DPAs. Applies to all sizes processing Korean data; large entities face escalated duties. No certification, but PIPC audits enforce via corrective orders.
ISO 20000 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 20000-1:2018 is the international certifiable standard for service management systems (SMS). It specifies auditable requirements to plan, establish, implement, operate, monitor, and improve services across their lifecycle, using a risk-based approach and Annex SL high-level structure for alignment with other ISO standards.
Key Components
- Clauses 4–10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation (portfolio, relationships, resolution, assurance), performance evaluation, improvement.
- Core processes: incident/problem management, change/release, configuration/asset, availability/continuity, supplier management.
- Built on PDCA cycle; flexible for ITIL/DevOps; third-party certification via Stage 1/2 audits and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Builds trust, reduces risks (outages, suppliers), improves efficiency (50% certificate growth per ISO survey).
- Enables market differentiation, customer retention, integration with ISO 9001/27001.
- Voluntary but driven by contracts, RFPs, resilience needs.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, SMS design, process deployment, audits. Applies to all sizes/industries; 12-18 months typical, with training, tooling, continual improvement.
Key Differences
| Aspect | K-PIPA | ISO 20000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection and privacy | IT service management systems |
| Industry | All sectors handling Korean data | Service providers all industries |
| Nature | Mandatory national privacy law | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | PIPC investigations and audits | Stage 1/2 certification audits |
| Penalties | 3% revenue fines, imprisonment | Loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about K-PIPA and ISO 20000
K-PIPA FAQ
ISO 20000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights
Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

TISAX Tabletop Exercises for EV Battery Suppliers: Ransomware Drill Scripts and AAR Templates with 2025 ENX Podcast Breakdown
Practical TISAX tabletop scripts for EV battery suppliers facing 'Very High' ASLP. Download ransomware AAR templates, get 2024 ENX lessons & 2025 podcast on VDA
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37001 vs AS9110C
ISO 37001 vs AS9110C: Compare anti-bribery ABMS with aerospace MRO QMS. Key differences, compliance benefits, risk mitigation & implementation tips for optimal choice. Dive in!
PCI DSS vs WELL
Compare PCI DSS vs WELL: Secure payments with PCI DSS cybersecurity or boost building health via WELL standards. Key diffs, benefits & strategies revealed. Optimize now!
ISO 56002 vs 23 NYCRR 500
Compare ISO 56002 vs 23 NYCRR 500: Innovation management guidance meets NY cybersecurity regs. Align IMS with compliance for resilient growth. Discover strategies now!