ISO 37001
International standard for anti-bribery management systems
AS9110C
International QMS standard for aviation maintenance organizations.
Quick Verdict
ISO 37001 provides anti-bribery management systems for all organizations worldwide, mitigating corruption risks through due diligence and controls. AS9110C delivers quality management for aviation MROs, ensuring airworthiness via traceability and safety. Companies adopt them for compliance, risk reduction, and market access.
ISO 37001
ISO 37001: Anti-bribery management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based anti-bribery management system framework
- Mandatory third-party due diligence and monitoring
- Leadership commitment and compliance function requirements
- PDCA cycle for continual improvement and audits
- Internationally certifiable with evidentiary legal mitigation
AS9110C
AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance Organizations
Key Features
- Configuration management and traceability controls
- Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention
- Risk-based operational planning and execution
- Human factors in root cause analysis
- Dedicated aviation safety policy requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
ISO 37001 Details
What It Is
ISO 37001: Anti-bribery management systems is an international certifiable standard providing requirements for establishing, implementing, and maintaining an Anti-Bribery Management System (ABMS). It uses a risk-based PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) approach to prevent, detect, and respond to bribery risks across organizations, covering direct/indirect bribery by personnel and business associates.
Key Components
- Core clauses 4-10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Key controls: policy, risk assessment, due diligence, financial/non-financial controls, training, reporting.
- Built on ISO Harmonized Structure for integration with standards like ISO 9001.
- Optional third-party certification with audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates legal risks (e.g., FCPA, UK Bribery Act) via evidentiary due diligence.
- Enhances reputation, stakeholder trust, ESG alignment.
- Drives efficiencies (up to 15% compliance cost reduction), operational controls.
- Competitive edge in tenders, high-risk sectors.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls, training, audits.
- Scalable for all sizes/sectors; 6-12 months typical.
- Certification via accredited bodies with surveillance audits.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C), officially Quality Management Systems Requirements for Aviation Maintenance Organizations, is an international certification standard. It builds on ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL structure, tailoring QMS for maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) providers. Primary purpose: ensure safe, compliant aviation services via risk-based thinking, PDCA, and aviation-specific controls.
Key Components
- 10 clauses covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Distinctive additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, preservation, product safety.
- ~300 requirements; certification through accredited bodies, listed in IAQG OASIS.
Why Organizations Use It
- Contractual mandates from OEMs/airlines; regulatory alignment (FAA/EASA Part 145).
- Mitigates safety risks, improves on-time delivery, reduces rework.
- Enhances market access, customer trust, operational resilience.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, pilots, audits (6-12 months typical).
- Applies to MROs globally; requires operational QMS evidence before Stage 2 certification audit.
Key Differences
| Aspect | ISO 37001 | AS9110C |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Anti-bribery management systems only | Aerospace maintenance quality management |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any size | Aviation MRO organizations globally |
| Nature | Voluntary certifiable management standard | Voluntary aerospace QMS certification |
| Testing | Third-party certification audits, surveillance | Stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, certification loss | No legal penalties, certification loss |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about ISO 37001 and AS9110C
ISO 37001 FAQ
AS9110C FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CMMC Cost Calculator: Realistic Budgets for Levels 1-3, C3PAO Fees, and ROI for Small DIB Suppliers
Calculate realistic CMMC costs for Levels 1-3: self-assessments, C3PAO fees, tooling, remediation & ROI. Interactive tool for small DIB suppliers. Get benchmark
Thailand PDPA Implementation Guide: Subordinate Regulations for 72-Hour Breach Reporting and Cross-Border Transfers (2022-2024 Rules)
Step-by-step Thailand PDPA guide: 72-hour breach notifications, cross-border transfers (2022-2024 rules). Risk checklists, GDPR templates avoid THB 5M fines. Mu
5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
TISAX vs EN 1090
Discover TISAX vs EN 1090: Automotive cybersecurity standard meets structural steel fabrication rules. Master compliance strategies & implementation for market success. Dive in!
IFS Food vs ISO 27018
Compare IFS Food vs ISO 27018: Food safety audits meet cloud PII protection. Discover key differences in scope, audits, compliance benefits for manufacturers & CSPs now!
WEEE vs J-SOX
Explore WEEE vs J-SOX: EU e-waste rules (Directive 2012/19/EU) vs Japan's ICFR controls. Key diffs, compliance strategies & risks for multinationals. Master global regs now!