K-PIPA
South Korea's regulation for personal data protection
ISO 22000
International standard for food safety management systems.
Quick Verdict
K-PIPA mandates strict data privacy for Korean operations, while ISO 22000 certifies voluntary food safety systems globally. Companies adopt K-PIPA for legal compliance in Korea; ISO 22000 for market access and supply chain trust.
K-PIPA
Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)
Key Features
- Mandates independent Chief Privacy Officers for all handlers
- Requires granular explicit consent for sensitive data transfers
- Enforces 72-hour breach notifications to data subjects
- Applies extraterritorially to foreign entities targeting Koreans
- Imposes fines up to 3% of global annual revenue
ISO 22000
ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems
Key Features
- High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
- Dual PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control
- HACCP-based hazard analysis with PRPs, OPRPs, CCPs
- Risk-based thinking across organizational and food hazards
- Interactive communication throughout food chain
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
K-PIPA Details
What It Is
K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation enacted in 2011, with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It protects personal, sensitive, and unique identification information of Korean residents through a consent-centric, risk-based approach, applying to all domestic and foreign data handlers processing such data, including extraterritorial scope.
Key Components
- Core principles: transparency, purpose limitation, data minimization, accountability via mandatory CPOs.
- Data subject rights: access, rectification, erasure, portability, objection (10-day response).
- Security: encryption, access controls, 72-hour breach notifications.
- No certification model; enforced by PIPC with revenue-based fines up to 3%.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal compliance avoids fines (e.g., Google's $50M penalty), mitigates risks from breaches, builds trust in privacy-sensitive markets. Enables secure cross-border transfers via certifications like ISMS-P, aligns with GDPR for adequacy.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, CPO appointment, policy development, technical controls, training, audits. Applies to all sizes handling Korean data; large entities face escalated duties. No formal certification but PIPC guidelines and voluntary audits recommended. (178 words)
ISO 22000 Details
What It Is
ISO 22000:2018 is the international standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It provides a certifiable framework for organizations in the food chain to ensure safe products through systematic hazard control. Its risk-based approach integrates HACCP principles with management system discipline using the High-Level Structure (HLS) and dual PDCA cycles.
Key Components
- **Clauses 4-10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, verification.
- Built on Codex HACCP and interactive communication.
- Voluntary certification via accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets regulatory/customer requirements; reduces recalls/risks.
- Enhances market access, supplier qualification, brand trust.
- Drives efficiency, integration with ISO 9001/14001.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, PRPs/hazard plans, training, audits.
- Applies to all food chain actors; scalable by size.
- Requires internal audits, management reviews; certification every 3 years. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | K-PIPA | ISO 22000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data protection and privacy | Food safety management systems |
| Industry | All sectors handling Korean data | Food chain organizations globally |
| Nature | Mandatory national privacy law | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | PIPC audits and investigations | Certification body audits |
| Penalties | Fines up to 3% revenue | Loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about K-PIPA and ISO 22000
K-PIPA FAQ
ISO 22000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's
SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: 10 Red Flags Auditors Flag and Model Answers for Walkthroughs
Master SOC 2 Type 2 audits with our guide: 10 red flags like incomplete logs/vendor gaps, model walkthrough answers, psychology tips. Pass first-time with <5% e
Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CCPA vs ISO 27701
Compare CCPA vs ISO 27701: CA's law mandates consumer rights & fines, while ISO 27701 certifies global PIMS for privacy risks. Key diffs, compliance tips & strategies inside. Boost your program now!
APPI vs GMP
Discover APPI vs GMP: Japan's privacy law meets manufacturing standards. Key differences, compliance strategies & implementation for tech/pharma success. Expert guide now!
GMP vs GLBA
Unlock GMP vs GLBA: Compare pharma manufacturing quality standards with financial data privacy safeguards. Gain key insights, compliance strategies for success. Dive in now!