What is the primary objective of **LGPD**?

**The primary objective of LGPD (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, Law No. 13.709/2018) is to protect the fundamental rights of privacy and freedom of natural persons through comprehensive regulation of personal data processing.** Enacted on August 14, 2018, it establishes 10 core principles (Art. 6)—including purpose limitation, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, and accountability—to govern controllers and processors. LGPD unifies prior fragmented laws, grants data subjects rights like access, correction, deletion, portability, and objection to automated decisions (Art. 18), and mandates security measures and breach notifications.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **LGPD**?

**All controllers and processors handling personal data of Brazilian residents must comply with LGPD, regardless of company size or location, due to its extraterritorial scope (Art. 3).** This includes any processing in Brazil, targeting Brazilian residents for goods/services, or collecting data therein—impacting global firms in e-commerce, fintech, healthcare, and cloud services. No employee/revenue thresholds apply; even micro-enterprises qualify if processing identified/identifiable natural persons' data (Art. 5, I), excluding only anonymized data (Art. 12) or exemptions like journalism (Art. 4).

Does **LGPD** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**LGPD does not mandate external audits or third-party certification, but ANPD may conduct audits and requires controllers to maintain processing records and conduct DPIAs for high-risk activities (Art. 37-38).** Enforcement relies on ANPD inspections; voluntary certifications like ISO 27701 can demonstrate compliance. Processors must follow controller instructions with security measures, and incidents demand self-reporting.

How often should an assessment for **LGPD** be performed?

**LGPD assessments, including Records of Processing Activities (RoPAs) and DPIAs for high-risk processing like legitimate interests, should be performed continuously with annual reviews and updates for changes (Art. 37-38).** ANPD guidance (e.g., CD/ANPD No. 02/2022) supports simplified records for small entities, but incident logs must be retained 5 years, with ongoing monitoring for principles like minimization and security.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **LGPD**?

**Non-compliance with LGPD incurs graduated sanctions by ANPD, including fines up to 2% of Brazilian revenue (capped at R$50 million per infraction), data processing suspension up to 6 months, and publicity of violations (Art. 52-53).** Factors like gravity, cooperation, and safeguards influence penalties; civil claims for damages (Art. 42) and operational disruptions also apply to B2B/employee data.

Can **LGPD** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, LGPD maps closely to international frameworks through shared principles, data subject rights, and mechanisms like SCCs for transfers (Art. 33-36).** ANPD-approved SCCs (Resolution CD/ANPD No. 19/2024, mandatory by August 23, 2025) and BCRs enable alignment, with no adequacy decisions issued yet. Multinationals leverage overlaps in purpose limitation and accountability for hybrid programs.

What is the first step to begin implementing **LGPD**?

**The first step to implement LGPD is appointing a Data Protection Officer (DPO) and conducting a comprehensive data mapping to create a Record of Processing Activities (RoPA) (Art. 41, 37).** Publish DPO details publicly; inventory data flows, legal bases (Art. 7, 10 options), sensitive data, and transfers to prioritize high-risk areas like breaches (3 business days notification, Resolution CD/ANPD No. 15/2024).

What is the primary objective of **AS9100**?

**AS9100's primary objective is to establish a quality management system (QMS) for aviation, space, and defense organizations that ensures product safety, configuration integrity, and supply chain reliability.** It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, including operational risk management (Clause 8.1.1), configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), and counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4), to prevent quality escapes in high-consequence environments.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **AS9100**?

**AS9100 applies professionally to organizations designing, developing, manufacturing, or servicing aviation, space, and defense products.** Major OEMs and primes require certification as a supplier condition; it covers manufacturers, material suppliers, design centers, and quality organizations, with 96% of certified entities under 500 employees per AAQG data. AS9110 and AS9120 variants address MRO and distributors specifically.

Does **AS9100** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, AS9100 requires third-party certification through accredited bodies via IAQG oversight.** The process includes Stage 1 (readiness/documentation review) and Stage 2 (implementation/effectiveness audit), with OASIS database listing for supplier visibility. Nonconformities demand corrective action within 60–90 days.

How often should an assessment for **AS9100** be performed?

**AS9100 certification maintenance requires annual surveillance audits and full recertification every three years.** Internal audits occur per a planned program (Clause 9.2), with risk-based frequency emphasizing high-risk processes like Clause 8 operations; management reviews are periodic per Clause 9.3.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **AS9100**?

**Non-compliance with AS9100 risks certification suspension, loss of OEM supplier approval, and contract termination.** Audits identify major nonconformities in areas like product safety or configuration management, requiring root cause analysis (including human factors) and verification; persistent issues lead to market exclusion via OASIS delisting.

Can **AS9100** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, AS9100D aligns structurally with ISO 9001:2015's Annex SL 10-clause format, enabling integrated management systems.** Its process-based QMS (Clauses 4–10) supports mapping to compatible standards through shared elements like risk-based thinking (Clause 6.1), leadership (Clause 5), and performance evaluation (Clause 9).

What is the first step to begin implementing **AS9100**?

**The first step is conducting a gap analysis against AS9100D requirements, defining QMS scope per Clause 4.3.** Assemble a cross-functional team to map processes, identify non-applicabilities, and prioritize aerospace additions like Clause 8 controls; obtain the standard and AS9101 audit guidance.

LGPD vs AS9100

Standards Comparison

LGPD

Mandatory

2020

Brazil's comprehensive regulation for personal data protection

AS9100

Mandatory

2016

International standard for aerospace quality management systems.

Quick Verdict

LGPD mandates data protection for Brazilian residents across industries, enforcing privacy rights with heavy fines. AS9100 certifies aerospace quality systems for safety-critical supply chains. Companies adopt LGPD for legal compliance, AS9100 for market access and reliability.

Data Privacy

LGPD

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (Law 13.709/2018)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope for Brazilian residents worldwide
10 core principles including prevention and non-discrimination
Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue capped R$50M
Mandatory DPO for controllers with public disclosure
3-business-day breach notifications to ANPD and subjects

Quality Management

AS9100

AS9100D Quality Management Systems for Aerospace

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Configuration management for product integrity
Product safety lifecycle controls
Counterfeit parts prevention processes
Operational risk management in Clause 8
Enhanced supplier and supply chain controls

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

LGPD Details

What It Is

Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (LGPD), Law No. 13.709/2018, is Brazil's comprehensive data protection regulation. It governs personal data processing with extraterritorial scope, applying to any entity targeting Brazilian residents. Primary purpose: safeguard privacy rights via risk-based approach with 10 principles like purpose limitation and accountability.

Key Components

10 principles (purpose, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, accountability)
Data subject rights (access, correction, deletion, portability, objection to automated decisions)
10 legal bases for processing (consent, contracts, legitimate interests, etc.)
**Governancemandatory DPO for controllers, records of processing, DPIAs for high-risk activities
Enforcement by ANPD with graduated sanctions

Why Organizations Use It

Legal compliance avoids fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap). Enhances risk management, builds stakeholder trust, enables market access in Brazil's digital economy. Strategic benefits: operational efficiency, competitive edge via privacy-by-design.

Implementation Overview

**Phased, risk-baseddata mapping, DPO appointment, policies, technical controls, training, audits. Applies to all sizes/industries processing Brazilian data. No certification; ANPD audits and self-attestation via records.

AS9100 Details

What It Is

AS9100D (AS9100:2016) is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation, space, and defense organizations. It extends ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 aerospace-specific requirements, using a process-based, risk-based thinking approach across 10 clauses aligned with Annex SL structure.

Key Components

Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Aerospace additions: configuration management (8.1.2), product safety (8.1.3), counterfeit parts prevention (8.1.4), operational risk (8.1.1), enhanced supplier controls (8.4).
Built on ISO 9001; certification via accredited third-party audits (Stage 1/2, surveillance).

Why Organizations Use It

Required by OEMs/primes for supply chain access.
Reduces defects, improves delivery, ensures safety/traceability.
Builds stakeholder trust, lowers costs, enhances competitiveness via OASIS visibility.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification.
Applies to all sizes in ASD; 6-18 months typical; evidence-driven audits mandatory.

Key Differences

Aspect	LGPD	AS9100
Scope	Personal data protection and processing	Aerospace quality management systems
Industry	All sectors processing Brazilian data	Aviation, space, defense sectors
Nature	Mandatory data protection law	Voluntary QMS certification standard
Testing	DPIAs for high-risk processing	Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance audits
Penalties	Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue	Certification loss, no legal fines

Scope

LGPD

Personal data protection and processing

AS9100

Aerospace quality management systems

Industry

LGPD

All sectors processing Brazilian data

AS9100

Aviation, space, defense sectors

Nature

LGPD

Mandatory data protection law

AS9100

Voluntary QMS certification standard

Testing

LGPD

DPIAs for high-risk processing

AS9100

Stage 1/2 audits, surveillance audits

Penalties

LGPD

Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue

AS9100

Certification loss, no legal fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about LGPD and AS9100

LGPD FAQ

AS9100 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

Discover the top tools for ISO 27701 compliance. Compare functionality, complexity, costs, and benefits to choose the best solution for your privacy program. Ac

SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic

First 5 steps to SOC 2 compliance with Confidentiality for fintech SaaS. Infographic maps controls to risks like encryption & TPRM. Integrates GLBA/PCI DSS over

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency

Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

APRA CPS 234 vs ISO 21001

Compare APRA CPS 234 vs ISO 21001: Cyber resilience for finance meets ed mgmt excellence. Key diffs in governance, controls & compliance. Boost your strategy—read now!

UL Certification vs ISO 37301

UL Certification vs ISO 37301: Product safety marks/testing (UL) vs risk-based org CMS (ISO). Boost compliance, market access, cut risks. Compare now!

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs IEC 62443

Compare CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs IEC 62443: Navigate compliance gaps, data localization vs zones/conduits, and strategies for China ops & IACS. Secure your edge now!

LGPD

AS9100

Quick Verdict

LGPD

Key Features

AS9100

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

LGPD Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

AS9100 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

LGPD FAQ

What is the primary objective of LGPD?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with LGPD?

Does LGPD require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for LGPD be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with LGPD?

Can LGPD be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing LGPD?

AS9100 FAQ

What is the primary objective of AS9100?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with AS9100?

Does AS9100 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for AS9100 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with AS9100?

Can AS9100 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing AS9100?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Tool Landscape for Reaching and Maintaining ISO 27701 Compliance

SOC 2 for Fintech Startups: First 5 Steps to Compliance with Confidentiality Criterion Infographic

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

APRA CPS 234 vs ISO 21001

UL Certification vs ISO 37301

CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs IEC 62443