GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 28000
    Standards Comparison

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 28000

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Mandatory
    2019

    China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection regime

    VS

    ISO 28000

    Voluntary
    2022

    International standard for supply chain security management systems

    Quick Verdict

    MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity for China's networks via PSB enforcement, while ISO 28000 offers voluntary supply chain security management globally. China firms adopt MLPS for legal compliance; global firms choose ISO for resilience and certification.

    Cybersecurity

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

    Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0 (MLPS 2.0)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Five-level impact-based classification of systems
    • Mandatory PSB registration and approval Level 2+
    • Third-party audits with 70/100 passing score
    • Extended controls for cloud IoT ICS big data
    • Law enforcement oversight by Public Security Bureaus
    Supply Chain Security

    ISO 28000

    ISO 28000:2022 Security management systems Requirements

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based supply chain security assessment and treatment
    • Leadership commitment and security policy requirements
    • Supplier and third-party governance controls
    • Incident response and recovery planning
    • PDCA cycle for continual improvement

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

    What It Is

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally enforceable regulatory framework for hierarchical cybersecurity protection. Mandated by Article 21 of the 2017 Cybersecurity Law, it requires all network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests. It employs an impact-based classification model with technical, governance, and management controls scaling by level.

    Key Components

    • Domains: physical security, network protection, data security, operations monitoring, personnel management.
    • Standards: GB/T 22239-2019 (baseline), GB/T 25070-2019 (technical), GB/T 28448-2019 (evaluation).
    • Extensions for cloud, IoT, big data, industrial controls.
    • Compliance: self-assessment, third-party audits (Level 2+ scoring 70/100), PSB approval, re-evaluations.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Avoids fines, license suspensions, inspections.
    • Meets legal obligations for China operations.
    • Strengthens risk management, resilience.
    • Enables market access, builds regulator trust.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: inventory, classify, gap analysis, remediate, audit, monitor.
    • Targets all mainland China network operators.
    • PSB enforcement requires local expertise.

    ISO 28000 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 28000:2022 is an international certification standard specifying requirements for establishing, implementing, maintaining, and improving a security management system (SMS) focused on supply chain security and resilience. It adopts a risk-based approach using the PDCA cycle to manage threats across people, assets, infrastructure, and information.

    Key Components

    • Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, and improvement.
    • Emphasizes risk assessment, security controls, incident response, supplier governance, and continual improvement.
    • Built on ISO High Level Structure for integration with standards like ISO 22301 and ISO 27001.
    • Optional certification via accredited bodies per ISO 28003.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates risks like theft, sabotage, and disruptions; reduces incident costs and insurance premiums.
    • Meets contractual, regulatory, and trade facilitation needs (e.g., C-TPAT equivalents).
    • Enhances resilience, market access, stakeholder trust, and competitive edge in logistics, manufacturing, and more.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, gap analysis, risk assessment, controls deployment, audits, certification.
    • Scalable for all sizes/industries; 6-36 months typical.
    • Involves training, supplier engagement, KPIs, and management reviews.

    Key Differences

    AspectMLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)ISO 28000
    ScopeCybersecurity for all info systems in ChinaSupply chain security management globally
    IndustryAll sectors in mainland ChinaLogistics, manufacturing worldwide
    NatureMandatory legal regime, PSB enforcedVoluntary management system standard
    TestingLevel 2+ third-party audits, PSB approvalInternal audits, optional certification
    PenaltiesFines, suspensions, license revocationNo legal penalties, certification loss

    Scope

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Cybersecurity for all info systems in China
    ISO 28000
    Supply chain security management globally

    Industry

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    All sectors in mainland China
    ISO 28000
    Logistics, manufacturing worldwide

    Nature

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Mandatory legal regime, PSB enforced
    ISO 28000
    Voluntary management system standard

    Testing

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Level 2+ third-party audits, PSB approval
    ISO 28000
    Internal audits, optional certification

    Penalties

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    Fines, suspensions, license revocation
    ISO 28000
    No legal penalties, certification loss

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and ISO 28000

    MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) FAQ

    ISO 28000 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

    NIST CSF 2.0 Plain English Decoder: Translating Govern, Supply Chain, and Core Functions from Jargon to Actionable Insights

    Demystify NIST CSF 2.0 jargon with plain English tables for Govern, Supply Chain & Core Functions. Actionable steps for risk oversight & vendor management. Empo

    The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability

    The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability

    Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and

    CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting

    CIS Controls v8.1 Metrics That Matter: KPIs, KRIs, and Dashboards for Board-Ready Cyber Reporting

    Quantify CIS Controls v8.1 success with KPIs, KRIs & dashboards. Learn what to measure, calculations, and executive presentations linking security to business r

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) and ISO 28000 compare against other standards

    Other MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Comparisons

    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • ISO 31000 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • HIPAA vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 30301
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 56002

    Other ISO 28000 Comparisons

    • ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 28000
    • ISO 28000 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • ISO 14001 vs ISO 28000
    • GDPR vs ISO 28000
    • PMBOK vs ISO 28000
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved