NERC CIP
Mandatory standards for BES cybersecurity and reliability protection
ISO 27018
International code for PII protection in public cloud processors.
Quick Verdict
NERC CIP mandates BES cyber reliability via audits and fines for utilities, while ISO 27018 provides voluntary PII privacy guidance for global cloud providers. Utilities adopt CIP for compliance; clouds use 27018 for trust.
NERC CIP
NERC Critical Infrastructure Protection Reliability Standards
Key Features
- Risk-based tiering of BES Cyber Systems by impact
- Mandatory recurring compliance cycles like 35-day patches
- Electronic Security Perimeters with deny-by-default access
- Incident response plans tested every 15 months
- Three-year evidence retention for annual audits
ISO 27018
ISO/IEC 27018:2025 Code of practice for PII protection
Key Features
- PII protection for public cloud processors
- Consent and purpose limitation requirements
- Sub-processor transparency and management
- Secure data deletion and return obligations
- Breach notification to controllers
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NERC CIP Details
What It Is
NERC CIP (North American Electric Reliability Corporation Critical Infrastructure Protection) Reliability Standards are mandatory cybersecurity and physical security regulations for the Bulk Electric System (BES). They employ a risk-based, tiered approach categorizing BES Cyber Systems as High, Medium, or Low impact to prioritize controls preventing misoperation or instability.
Key Components
- Core standards: CIP-002 (scoping), CIP-003 (governance), CIP-004 (personnel), CIP-005/006 (perimeters), CIP-007 (systems security), CIP-008-010 (response/recovery/configuration).
- Recurring cycles: 15-month reviews, 35-day patches, 90-day log retention.
- Compliance via annual audits, evidence retention for three years, enforced by NERC/FERC.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal mandate for BES owners/operators with FERC penalties up to $1M+ per violation.
- Enhances grid reliability, reduces outage risks, lowers insurance costs.
- Builds stakeholder trust, enables market access.
Implementation Overview
Phased: asset categorization, policy development, technical controls, testing. Applies to utilities/transmission entities in US/Canada/Mexico; requires ongoing audits, no formal certification but compliance enforcement.
ISO 27018 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27018:2025 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public cloud environments where providers act as PII processors. Its primary purpose is to provide cloud-specific privacy controls, focusing on processors' obligations under contracts with controllers. It employs a risk-based approach, layering privacy guidance onto an ISO 27001 ISMS.
Key Components
- Core themes: consent/purpose limitation, transparency, data minimization, subcontractor management, logging/auditability, breach notification, secure deletion.
- Aligns with ISO/IEC 27002:2022's 93 controls, adding ~25-30 PII-specific enhancements.
- Built on ISO/IEC 29100 privacy principles.
- Certification via extension of ISO 27001 audits; no standalone cert.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets processor duties under GDPR/LGPD/CCPA.
- Enhances trust in cloud PII processing.
- Reduces procurement friction via audited SoA.
- Supports multi-framework compliance (e.g., SOC 2).
Implementation Overview
- Layer onto existing ISO 27001 ISMS; gap analysis first.
- Key activities: control mapping, policy updates, tooling for monitoring/deletion.
- Applies to cloud processors of all sizes; global scope.
- Requires annual surveillance audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NERC CIP | ISO 27018 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | BES cyber systems reliability protection | PII protection in public clouds |
| Industry | North American electric utilities | Global cloud service providers |
| Nature | Mandatory enforceable reliability standards | Voluntary code of practice |
| Testing | Annual audits, 15-month reviews | ISO 27001 audits with extensions |
| Penalties | FERC fines up to millions | Certification loss, no legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NERC CIP and ISO 27018
NERC CIP FAQ
ISO 27018 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: First 5 Steps to Ace Your Type 2 Audit with Infographic
Ace your SOC 2 Type 2 audit with the first 5 essential steps: evidence collection, auditor tips, red flags from SignWell's experience. Get checklists & infograp
Beyond the Checkbox: Why Maturity Assessments are the Secret to Sustainable Compliance
Discover why maturity assessments beat binary compliance checks by uncovering hidden gaps and enabling continuous improvement for sustainable success. Read now!
Top 5 Reasons Automation Tools Like Vanta Slash SOC 2 Type 2 Timelines from Months to Weeks
Automation tools like Vanta cut SOC 2 Type 2 prep from 6 months to 6 weeks, saving 70% costs. See SignWell examples, AWS/Okta/GitHub integrations. CISOs: Get fi
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
APPI vs FedRAMP
APPI vs FedRAMP: Compare Japan's privacy law with US federal cloud security. Key differences, compliance strategies, risks & tips for global tech success—read now!
NIST 800-53 vs ISO 22000
Discover NIST 800-53 vs ISO 22000: Compare cybersecurity/privacy controls with food safety management. Uncover differences, overlaps, RMF integration & implementation for compliance success.
NIS2 vs EU AI Act
Discover NIS2 vs EU AI Act: NIS2 expands cyber scope, mandates 24/72hr reports & 2% fines; AI Act bans high-risk AI, phases GPAI rules. Compare & comply now!