What is the primary objective of **NIST 800-53**?

**NIST SP 800-53 provides a catalog of security and privacy controls to protect organizational operations, assets, individuals, other organizations, and the nation from diverse threats including hostile attacks, human errors, natural disasters, structural failures, foreign intelligence, and privacy risks.** Revision 5 organizes 20 control families (e.g., AC Access Control, SR Supply Chain Risk Management) with over 1,100 base controls and enhancements, emphasizing functionality and assurance perspectives. Controls are outcome-based, flexible, and integrated with the Risk Management Framework (RMF) in SP 800-37 for risk-informed selection, tailoring, implementation, assessment (via SP 800-53A), authorization, and monitoring.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **NIST 800-53**?

**Federal agencies and contractors processing federal information are legally required to implement NIST SP 800-53 controls under FISMA and OMB Circular A-130.** SP 800-53B mandates minimum controls from baselines (low/moderate/high per FIPS 199 impact levels) for federal systems. Contractors face contractual obligations, especially for FedRAMP or CUI. Non-federal organizations (state/local governments, private sector, critical infrastructure) adopt voluntarily for robust programs, with baselines applicable to any entity handling sensitive data.

Does **NIST 800-53** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, NIST SP 800-53 does not require external audits or third-party certification; it mandates internal assessment of control effectiveness using SP 800-53A procedures.** Organizations assess via RMF steps: categorize systems (FIPS 199), select/tailor baselines (SP 800-53B), implement, assess (examine/test/interview), authorize via Authorizing Official, and monitor continuously (CA family). Federal systems may involve agency oversight or IG audits, but certification is not inherent.

How often should an assessment for **NIST 800-53** be performed?

**NIST SP 800-53 requires continuous monitoring with periodic full reassessments aligned to risk, typically annually or upon significant changes.** SP 800-53A provides assessment procedures; high-impact controls demand near-real-time monitoring (e.g., CA-7), while low-impact may suffice quarterly/annually. RMF integrates ongoing assessments into authorization and monitoring, with POA&Ms tracking remediation.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **NIST 800-53**?

**Non-compliance with NIST SP 800-53 for federal entities risks FISMA violations, contract termination, loss of authorization to operate (ATO), fines, and increased oversight.** SP 800-53B ties to FIPS 200 baselines; failures lead to remediation mandates, cost overruns (e.g., GAO-noted DOD delays), reputational damage, and heightened breach vulnerability without CIA/privacy protections.

An **NIST 800-53** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, NIST provides official mappings from SP 800-53 Rev. 5 to frameworks like NIST CSF, NIST Privacy Framework, and ISO/IEC 27001:2022.** Mappings in OLIR catalog show coverage relationships (not strict equivalence) for multi-framework alignment, supporting gap analysis and reporting while requiring validation for specific requirements.

What is the first step to begin implementing **NIST 800-53**?

**The first step is system categorization per FIPS 199 to determine low/moderate/high impact levels for confidentiality, integrity, and availability.** This informs baseline selection from SP 800-53B, followed by risk assessment (RA family), tailoring, and RMF Prepare step for scoped control selection.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 22000**?

**ISO 22000 enables organizations to provide safe products and services through a comprehensive Food Safety Management System (FSMS).** It requires preventing or reducing food safety hazards to acceptable levels, ensuring compliance with statutory and customer requirements, and facilitating effective internal/external communication across the food chain. The standard integrates **PRPs**, **hazard analysis**, **CCPs/OPRPs**, and two nested **PDCA cycles** for strategic and operational control, as defined in ISO 22000:2018 published June 19, 2018.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 22000**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 22000, as it is a voluntary international standard.** It applies professionally to any entity in the food chain—primary producers, feed manufacturers, processors, packaging providers, transporters, retailers, and food services—that directly or indirectly impacts food safety. Certification demonstrates FSMS effectiveness to customers, regulators, and stakeholders, often mandated by contracts or GFSI schemes like FSSC 22000.

Does **ISO 22000** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 22000 does not require external audit or third-party certification; these are voluntary for conformity assessment.** Certification by accredited bodies follows ISO/IEC guidelines via stage 1 (readiness) and stage 2 (implementation) audits, with annual surveillance and triennial recertification. Internal audits (Clause 9.2) are mandatory to verify FSMS effectiveness.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 22000** be performed?

**Internal audits for ISO 22000 must be conducted at planned intervals, typically risk-based with high-risk processes audited more frequently.** Management reviews (Clause 9.3) occur regularly, often quarterly or semi-annually, incorporating audit results, performance data, and changes. Full FSMS reassessments align with recertification every three years or significant changes.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 22000**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 22000 results in loss of certification, if pursued, but no direct legal penalties as it is voluntary.** Consequences include market exclusion by buyers requiring certification, reputational damage from food safety incidents, recalls, regulatory fines under local laws, litigation, and supply chain disruptions due to inadequate hazard controls.

An **ISO 22000** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 22000:2018 follows the High-Level Structure (HLS), enabling seamless mapping and integration with other ISO management system standards.** Its PDCA cycles and clauses 4–10 align with frameworks like ISO 9001 for quality management, supporting combined audits and unified systems while preserving food safety specifics in Clause 8.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 22000**?

**The first step is determining organizational context and FSMS scope per Clause 4, identifying internal/external issues and interested parties.** Assemble a cross-functional food safety team, conduct a gap analysis against clauses 4–10, and secure leadership commitment for a food safety policy (Clause 5).

NIST 800-53 vs ISO 22000

Standards Comparison

NIST 800-53

Mandatory

2020

U.S. catalog of security and privacy controls

ISO 22000

Voluntary

2018

International standard for food safety management systems.

Quick Verdict

NIST 800-53 provides security/privacy controls for federal systems and adopters worldwide, while ISO 22000 establishes food safety management for the global food chain. Organizations adopt NIST for compliance and risk management; ISO for certification, market access, and hazard control.

Security Controls

NIST 800-53

NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Security and Privacy Controls

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

20 control families with 1,100+ outcome-based security/privacy controls
Tailorable baselines (Low/Moderate/High/Privacy) in SP 800-53B
Integrated privacy controls and dedicated PT family
Supply Chain Risk Management (SR) family for modern threats
OSCAL machine-readable formats enabling automation and continuous monitoring

Food Safety

ISO 22000

ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

High-Level Structure for integrated management systems
Dual PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control
Hazard analysis with CCPs and OPRPs categorization
Prerequisite programs establishing hygiene baseline
Interactive communication across food chain

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

NIST 800-53 Details

What It Is

NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 is the U.S. federal government's primary catalog of security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations. It provides a flexible, risk-based framework to protect confidentiality, integrity, availability, and privacy risks through outcome-oriented controls.

Key Components

Organized into 20 control families (e.g., AC, AU, SR, PT) with over 1,100 base controls and enhancements.
Baselines in SP 800-53B (Low/Moderate/High impact, Privacy baseline).
Built on RMF (SP 800-37) lifecycle; supports tailoring, overlays, parameters.
Compliance via assessment procedures in SP 800-53A; OSCAL for automation.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets FISMA/OMB A-130 mandates for federal entities/contractors.
Enhances risk management, resilience, supply chain security.
Enables reciprocity, FedRAMP, competitive differentiation.
Builds stakeholder trust through auditable evidence.

Implementation Overview

Follow **RMFcategorize, select/tailor baselines, implement, assess, authorize, monitor.
Phased rollout with automation (OSCAL, GRC tools).
Applies to federal, contractors, critical infrastructure; scalable by size.
No formal certification; relies on ATO and continuous monitoring.

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

ISO 22000:2018 is the international standard for Food Safety Management Systems (FSMS). It provides a certifiable framework for organizations in the food chain to ensure safe products through systematic hazard control. Its risk-based approach integrates HACCP principles with management system discipline using the High-Level Structure (HLS) and dual PDCA cycles.

Key Components

**Clauses 4-10Context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, communication.
Built on Codex HACCP and HLS for integration.
Voluntary certification via accredited bodies.

Why Organizations Use It

Meets regulatory/customer requirements; reduces recalls/risks.
Enhances supply chain trust, market access (e.g., GFSI).
Drives efficiency, resilience; builds stakeholder confidence.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, PRPs, hazard control, verification, audits.
Applies to all food chain organizations; scalable by size.
Certification: stage 1/2 audits, annual surveillance.

Key Differences

Aspect	NIST 800-53	ISO 22000
Scope	Security/privacy controls for info systems	Food safety management across food chain
Industry	Federal, contractors, critical infrastructure global	Food production, processing, retail worldwide
Nature	Voluntary control catalog, federal mandatory	Voluntary certifiable management system standard
Testing	SP 800-53A assessments, continuous monitoring	Internal audits, management review, certification
Penalties	Contract loss, no direct fines	Certification loss, no legal penalties

Scope

NIST 800-53

Security/privacy controls for info systems

ISO 22000

Food safety management across food chain

Industry

NIST 800-53

Federal, contractors, critical infrastructure global

ISO 22000

Food production, processing, retail worldwide

Nature

NIST 800-53

Voluntary control catalog, federal mandatory

ISO 22000

Voluntary certifiable management system standard

Testing

NIST 800-53

SP 800-53A assessments, continuous monitoring

ISO 22000

Internal audits, management review, certification

Penalties

NIST 800-53

Contract loss, no direct fines

ISO 22000

Certification loss, no legal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about NIST 800-53 and ISO 22000

NIST 800-53 FAQ

ISO 22000 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

Deploy CIS Controls v8.1 as a control backbone for NIS2 & DORA compliance. Step-by-step roadmap (IG1→IG2), deliverables, metrics & evidence model for hybrid/clo

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026

Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 45001 vs ISO 14064

Compare ISO 45001 vs ISO 14064: OHSMS for worker safety meets GHG accounting for emissions. Integrate via HLS for compliance, risk cuts & sustainability. Dive in!

GMP vs PIPEDA

Discover GMP vs PIPEDA: Pharma manufacturing standards meet Canada's privacy law. Unlock compliance strategies, risk insights. Expert comparison awaits!

BRC vs ISO 28000

Compare BRC vs ISO 28000: BRC drives food safety via HACCP & GMP in manufacturing; ISO 28000 secures resilient supply chains. Pick the best for compliance & risk control. Dive in today!

NIST 800-53

ISO 22000

Quick Verdict

NIST 800-53

Key Features

ISO 22000

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

NIST 800-53 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 22000 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

NIST 800-53 FAQ

What is the primary objective of NIST 800-53?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with NIST 800-53?

Does NIST 800-53 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for NIST 800-53 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with NIST 800-53?

An NIST 800-53 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing NIST 800-53?

ISO 22000 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 22000?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 22000?

Does ISO 22000 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 22000 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 22000?

An ISO 22000 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 22000?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

How to Implement CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Control Backbone’ for NIS2 & DORA (Step-by-Step Implementation Guide)

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 45001 vs ISO 14064

GMP vs PIPEDA

BRC vs ISO 28000