NIS2
EU directive for cybersecurity resilience across critical sectors
AS9110C
Aerospace QMS standard for aircraft MRO organizations.
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates cybersecurity resilience for EU critical entities via risk management and rapid incident reporting, while AS9110C certifies quality systems for aviation MROs emphasizing traceability and airworthiness. EU firms comply with NIS2 legally; aerospace adopts AS9110C for contracts and safety.
NIS2
Network and Information Systems Directive 2 (NIS2)
Key Features
- Expands scope via size-cap rule to medium/large entities
- Mandates strict 24-hour early warning incident reporting
- Imposes direct senior management accountability for compliance
- Levies fines up to 2% global annual turnover
- Requires continuous supply chain risk management measures
AS9110C
AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aircraft Maintenance
Key Features
- Risk-based thinking embedded in planning and operations
- Configuration management and part traceability controls
- Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention processes
- Human factors integration in competence and audits
- Maintenance release and project management requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
NIS2, officially Directive (EU) 2022/2555, is an EU regulation strengthening cybersecurity. It expands the original NIS Directive's scope to essential and important entities in 18 sectors like energy, transport, and digital infrastructure. Adopts a risk-based approach emphasizing continuous assurance over static compliance.
Key Components
- Four pillars: risk management, incident reporting, business continuity, corporate accountability.
- Strict reporting: 24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, one-month final report.
- Leverages standards like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF; focuses on supply chain security, access controls, encryption.
- No formal certification but subject to audits and spot checks.
Why Organizations Use It
Ensures legal compliance amid transposition by October 2024, avoiding fines up to 2% global turnover. Enhances resilience against threats like APTs and ransomware, protects critical services, builds stakeholder trust, and drives competitive cyber maturity.
Implementation Overview
Targets medium/large EU entities (50+ employees or €10M turnover). Involves risk assessments, training, reporting procedures, governance changes. Ongoing process with national variations, spot checks by CSIRTs; proactive adoption recommended for resilience.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements for safety-critical maintenance processes. Its primary scope covers aircraft and component MRO, emphasizing risk-based thinking (RBT), configuration control, and continuing airworthiness.
Key Components
- 10 clauses following ISO High Level Structure (HLS).
- Core areas: leadership commitment, operational planning (Clause 8), counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, supplier controls, internal audits, and management reviews.
- Built on PDCA cycle and RBT; requires documented evidence of QMS operation.
- Certification via accredited registrars with Stage 1/2 audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets customer/OEM contract requirements and regulatory alignment (FAA/EASA Part-145).
- Mitigates safety risks, reduces rework/AOG events, improves on-time delivery.
- Enhances market access via IAQG OASIS listing, builds stakeholder trust.
- Drives efficiency (5-12% labor cost reduction) and competitive differentiation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, process design, pilot, audits, certification (6-12 months typical).
- Applies to MROs of all sizes globally; involves training, eQMS, KPIs.
- Requires operational QMS exercise (3+ months data) before certification. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | AS9110C |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting for critical sectors | Quality management for aviation maintenance, repair, overhaul |
| Industry | Essential/important entities in EU sectors like energy, transport | Aerospace MRO organizations worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation with national transposition | Voluntary certification standard based on ISO 9001 |
| Testing | Incident reporting timelines to CSIRTs, national audits | Internal audits, management reviews, certification audits |
| Penalties | Fines up to 2% global turnover or €10M | Loss of certification, no direct legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and AS9110C
NIS2 FAQ
AS9110C FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for
ISO 27701 2025 Update: Navigating Standalone Certification Myths, Audit Realities, and a 90-Day PIMS Launch Plan
Debunk ISO 27701 2025 standalone certification myths vs ISO 27001. Get a 90-day PIMS launch roadmap, checklists & audit prep to certify faster amid global priva
Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application
Master NIST CSF 2.0 structure: Govern + 5 Core functions, Tiers (Partial-Adaptive), Profiles for gaps, and real-world apps. Build effective cyber risk strategie
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
SOC 2 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Compare SOC 2 vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023—data security controls vs AI governance std. Unlock differences, benefits & pick the best for trust & compliance now!
COPPA vs FedRAMP
Compare COPPA vs FedRAMP: Child privacy rules meet federal cloud security. Key diffs, $170M fines, consent methods & baselines. Master compliance now!
OSHA vs FERPA
Unlock OSHA vs FERPA: Compare workplace safety standards with student privacy laws. Essential guide to compliance, key differences, and best practices for educators & execs. Dive in!