Standards Comparison

    NIS2

    Mandatory
    2022

    EU directive for high cybersecurity across critical sectors

    VS

    EPA

    Mandatory
    1970

    U.S. federal regulations for environmental protection compliance

    Quick Verdict

    NIS2 mandates cybersecurity resilience for EU essential entities via risk management and reporting, while EPA enforces environmental standards for US industries through emissions limits and monitoring. Companies adopt NIS2 for EU compliance and cyber protection, EPA to avoid penalties and ensure sustainability.

    Cybersecurity

    NIS2

    Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Expanded scope with size-cap rule for medium/large entities
    • Strict multi-stage incident reporting within 24/72 hours
    • Direct senior management accountability for cybersecurity
    • Continuous risk management including supply chain security
    • Fines up to 2% of global annual turnover
    Air Quality

    EPA

    EPA Standards (CAA, CWA, RCRA)

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Multi-layered architecture: statutes, 40 CFR, permits
    • Evidence-driven compliance via monitoring and reporting
    • Federal-state implementation with layered obligations
    • Technology- and health-based performance standards
    • Strict enforcement with civil/criminal penalties

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    NIS2 Details

    What It Is

    NIS2 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 is an EU regulation expanding the original NIS Directive. It establishes a high common level of cybersecurity resilience for critical infrastructure and digital services across member states. Primary scope covers essential and important entities in sectors like energy, transport, health, and digital providers. It employs a risk-based approach with continuous assurance over static compliance.

    Key Components

    • **Risk managementOngoing assessments, supply chain security, access controls, encryption.
    • **Incident reportingEarly warning (24h), detailed (72h), final report (1 month).
    • **Business continuityRecovery plans, crisis procedures.
    • **Corporate accountabilitySenior management direct responsibility. Built on standards like ISO 27001, NIST CSF; enforced via national CSIRTs with spot checks.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated for in-scope entities to avoid fines up to 2% global turnover. Enhances resilience against threats, ensures service continuity, builds stakeholder trust. Provides competitive edge through proactive cybersecurity, harmonized EU compliance.

    Implementation Overview

    Assess applicability by size/sector; implement risk frameworks, training, reporting processes. Tailor to national transpositions (post-Oct 2024). Enterprise-wide transformation; leverage existing controls. No formal certification but audits/spot checks required. Targets medium/large EU entities in covered sectors.

    EPA Details

    What It Is

    EPA standards are a family of legally binding U.S. federal regulations codified in 40 CFR, implementing major statutes like the Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Their primary purpose is protecting human health and the environment through air, water, and waste controls. They employ a risk- and technology-based approach, blending health endpoints (e.g., NAAQS) with performance standards (e.g., MACT, effluent guidelines).

    Key Components

    • Statutory foundations, regulatory frameworks in 40 CFR, and site-specific permits (NPDES, Title V).
    • Numeric limits, thresholds, monitoring, recordkeeping, and enforcement pathways.
    • Core principles: uniform national baselines, state implementation, evidence-driven compliance.
    • Strict liability enforcement model with civil/criminal penalties.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid penalties, shutdowns, and liabilities. Drives risk management, operational efficiency, ESG alignment, and access to grants/markets.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: gap analysis, controls design, training, digital monitoring. Applies to industries like manufacturing, energy; requires audits, no central certification but permit compliance.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    NIS2
    Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting, governance
    EPA
    Environmental protection across air, water, waste management

    Industry

    NIS2
    Essential/important entities in EU sectors like energy, transport
    EPA
    US industries including energy, manufacturing, chemicals, agriculture

    Nature

    NIS2
    Mandatory EU directive with national transposition
    EPA
    Mandatory US regulations under statutes like CAA, CWA, RCRA

    Testing

    NIS2
    Risk assessments, incident response plans, audits
    EPA
    Monitoring, sampling, recordkeeping, inspections per protocols

    Penalties

    NIS2
    Up to 2% global turnover or €10M fines
    EPA
    Civil penalties, fines, injunctive relief, criminal liability

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about NIS2 and EPA

    NIS2 FAQ

    EPA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages