NIS2
EU regulation enhancing cybersecurity resilience for critical sectors
FDA 21 CFR Part 11
FDA regulation for trustworthy electronic records and signatures.
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates EU-wide cybersecurity resilience for critical infrastructure, while FDA 21 CFR Part 11 ensures electronic records' trustworthiness in life sciences. Companies adopt NIS2 for regulatory survival in essential sectors; Part 11 for compliant digital transformation and FDA inspection readiness.
NIS2
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 Network and Information Systems 2
Key Features
- Broadened scope via size-cap rule for medium/large entities
- Strict multi-stage incident reporting timelines
- Direct senior management accountability for compliance
- Continuous proactive risk management framework
- Fines up to 2% global annual turnover
FDA 21 CFR Part 11
21 CFR Part 11 Electronic Records; Electronic Signatures
Key Features
- Secure, time-stamped audit trails for changes
- Controls for closed and open systems
- Electronic signatures equivalent to handwritten
- Risk-based system validation requirements
- Access, authority, and device checks
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
NIS2, officially Directive (EU) 2022/2555, is an EU regulation expanding the original NIS Directive. It establishes a high common level of cybersecurity resilience for critical infrastructure and digital services across member states. NIS2 employs a risk-based, continuous assurance approach, shifting from static compliance to proactive, evidence-based practices.
Key Components
- Four pillars: risk management, business continuity, incident reporting, corporate accountability.
- Mandates robust measures like supply chain security, access controls, encryption, and incident response plans.
- Strict reporting: 24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, one-month final report to CSIRTs.
- Aligns with standards like ISO 27001, NIST; enforced via national audits and spot checks, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Essential/important entities comply to avoid fines up to 2% global turnover or €10M. It enhances cyber resilience, mitigates threats, ensures business continuity, and builds stakeholder trust. Provides competitive advantages through harmonized multi-state operations and proactive defense.
Implementation Overview
Applies to medium/large entities in sectors like energy, transport, digital services via size-cap rule. Involves risk assessments, governance setup, training, and supplier oversight. Member states transposed by October 2024; requires ongoing monitoring and real-time evidence for authorities. (178 words)
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 Details
What It Is
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 is a U.S. federal regulation establishing criteria for electronic records and electronic signatures to be considered trustworthy, reliable, and equivalent to paper records and handwritten signatures. It applies to FDA-regulated industries using electronic systems for predicate rule records, employing a risk-based approach with controls for closed and open systems.
Key Components
- Subparts covering general provisions, electronic records (§11.10 closed systems, §11.30 open systems), and signatures (§§11.50-11.300).
- Core controls: validation, audit trails, access limits, operational/authority/device checks, training, accountability policies.
- Built on ALCOA+ principles; no formal certification, but FDA enforcement and inspections.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for electronic reliance in pharma, devices, biotech to avoid enforcement.
- Enhances data integrity, inspection readiness, operational efficiency.
- Mitigates risks like warning letters; builds stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping, gap analysis, validation (IQ/OQ/PQ), SOPs, training.
- Targets life sciences; global via harmonization; FDA inspections verify compliance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | FDA 21 CFR Part 11 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting, resilience for critical sectors | Electronic records/signatures trustworthiness, system controls for FDA-regulated records |
| Industry | Essential/important entities in EU sectors (energy, transport, digital services) | Life sciences (pharma, devices, biotech) using electronic records under FDA predicate rules |
| Nature | Mandatory EU directive, transposed nationally with enforcement authorities | US FDA regulation with enforcement discretion on some controls, predicate rules enforced |
| Testing | Risk assessments, continuous assurance, spot checks by national authorities | Risk-based system validation (IQ/OQ/PQ), audit trails, access controls testing |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover or €10M for essential entities | Warning letters, Form 483s, product holds, injunctions for data integrity failures |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and FDA 21 CFR Part 11
NIS2 FAQ
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews
Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the

Top 10 Cost-Saving Hacks for CMMC Compliance: Budgeting Blueprints for Small DIB Suppliers
Slash CMMC costs 30-50% with top 10 hacks for small DIB suppliers. Enclave scoping, FedRAMP clouds, automation, POA&M tips & budgeting blueprints for Level 2 co

NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EMAS vs GLBA
EMAS vs GLBA: Compare EU's voluntary eco-management scheme with US financial privacy safeguards. Key differences, compliance tips & strategic benefits for global firms. Dive in!
COPPA vs HITRUST CSF
Compare COPPA vs HITRUST CSF: Kids' privacy law meets certifiable security standards. Avoid $170M fines, master compliance gaps. Secure your data now!
GMP vs ISO 27032
Explore GMP vs ISO 27032: Compare pharma manufacturing standards with cybersecurity guidelines for Internet threats. Ensure compliance, quality & resilience—key insights await!