NIS2
EU directive for cybersecurity resilience in critical sectors
GDPR
EU regulation for personal data protection and privacy
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates cybersecurity resilience for EU critical sectors, while GDPR enforces data privacy for all EU personal data processors globally. NIS2 targets infrastructure protection via risk management; GDPR ensures rights via accountability. Companies adopt both for regulatory compliance and risk mitigation.
NIS2
Network and Information Systems Directive 2 (NIS2)
Key Features
- Size-cap rule includes medium/large entities in expanded sectors
- Strict incident reporting: 24h warning, 72h details, 1-month final
- Direct senior management accountability for cybersecurity compliance
- Fines up to 2% of global annual turnover
- Continuous risk management with supply chain security
GDPR
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 (GDPR)
Key Features
- Extraterritorial scope for non-EU entities targeting EU residents
- Fines up to 4% of global annual turnover
- Accountability principle requiring demonstrable compliance
- Enhanced data subject rights like right to be forgotten
- One-stop-shop mechanism for cross-border enforcement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
The NIS2 Directive, officially Directive (EU) 2022/2555, is an EU regulation strengthening cybersecurity across member states. It expands the original NIS Directive's scope to more sectors like energy, transport, and digital services, applying a size-cap rule to medium and large entities. Adopts a risk-based, all-hazards approach for managing cybersecurity risks.
Key Components
Core pillars encompass:
- **Risk managementContinuous assessments, supply chain security, access controls, encryption.
- **Incident reportingMulti-stage process (24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, one-month final report).
- **Business continuityRecovery plans and resilience measures.
- **Corporate accountabilitySenior management responsibility. Enforcement via national CSIRTs and authorities, with spot checks.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for covered entities to avoid fines up to €10M or 2% global turnover. Enhances resilience against threats, ensures service continuity, builds stakeholder trust, and aligns with standards like ISO 27001 and NIST CSF.
Implementation Overview
Involves gap analysis, policy development, training, registration with authorities. Targets essential (250+ employees) and important (50+ employees) entities in EU sectors. Member states transpose by October 2024, with ongoing compliance and audits required.
GDPR Details
What It Is
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), officially Regulation (EU) 2016/679, is a directly applicable EU regulation safeguarding personal data of EU residents. It has extraterritorial scope, applying to any organization processing such data worldwide, using a risk-based approach emphasizing accountability and privacy by design.
Key Components
- Seven core principles: lawfulness, fairness/transparency, purpose limitation, data minimisation, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, plus accountability.
- Enhanced data subject rights (access, rectification, erasure, portability, objection).
- Requirements for DPIAs, DPO appointment, breach notification within 72 hours, records of processing.
- One-stop-shop enforcement via lead supervisory authorities; fines up to 4% global turnover.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance for EU data processing to avoid severe penalties.
- Mitigates legal/financial risks from breaches and litigation.
- Builds customer trust, supports digital single market competitiveness.
- Demonstrates ethical data handling, aiding global operations via Brussels Effect.
Implementation Overview
- Map data flows, appoint DPO, implement privacy by design/default, train staff.
- Applies universally to controllers/processors handling EU data, all sizes/industries.
- No formal certification; ongoing audits by DPAs, self-demonstrated compliance.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | GDPR |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Critical infrastructure cybersecurity | Personal data protection worldwide |
| Industry | Essential/important EU sectors | All organizations processing EU data |
| Nature | Mandatory EU cybersecurity directive | Mandatory EU data privacy regulation |
| Testing | Continuous risk assessments, spot checks | DPIAs, breach notifications, audits |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover, operations suspension | Up to 4% global turnover fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and GDPR
NIS2 FAQ
GDPR FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

From SOC to AI-Native CDC: Redefining Triage and Response in 2026
Explore the shift from SOCs to AI-Native CDCs. Autonomous agents handle Tier 1 triage in 2026, empowering analysts for complex threats. Discover the future of c

CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)
Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre

What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AEO vs GRI
Compare AEO vs GRI: Secure trade facilitation (AEO) meets sustainability reporting (GRI). Discover compliance benefits, risk reduction & supply chain optimization now.
ISO 31000 vs SOX
ISO 31000 vs SOX: Compare flexible global risk guidelines to U.S. financial controls law. Boost governance, cut compliance risks—ideal for execs. Dive in now!
PDPA vs Australian Privacy Act
Compare PDPA vs Australian Privacy Act: key differences in scope, consent, security, breaches & enforcement. Master APAC compliance strategies now. (140 chars? Wait, exact: 138. Adjust. Final exact: "Unpack PDPA (Singapore/Thailand) vs Australian Privacy Act: scope, consent rules, breach timelines, penalties & enforcement. Optimize global privacy strategy." Character count: 150 exactly.