NIS2
EU directive for cybersecurity resilience in critical sectors
GMP
Regulatory framework for consistent manufacturing quality controls.
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates cybersecurity resilience for EU critical sectors via risk management and rapid incident reporting, while GMP enforces manufacturing quality controls through validation and documentation. Companies adopt NIS2 for regulatory compliance and cyber defense; GMP ensures product safety and market access.
NIS2
Network and Information Systems Directive 2 (NIS2)
Key Features
- Expands scope via size-cap rule to medium/large entities
- Mandates 24-hour early warning incident reporting
- Holds senior management directly accountable for compliance
- Imposes fines up to 2% global annual turnover
- Requires continuous risk management and supply chain security
GMP
Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP)
Key Features
- Independent quality unit oversight and batch release
- Risk-based Quality Risk Management (QRM) principles
- Process and equipment validation (IQ/OQ/PQ)
- Comprehensive documentation and data integrity (ALCOA++)
- Continual improvement via CAPA and audits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
NIS2 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 is an EU regulation replacing the original NIS Directive. It establishes a high common level of cybersecurity across member states, expanding scope to more sectors like energy, transport, and digital services. Applies to essential and important entities via size-cap rule (medium/large organizations). Employs a risk-based, all-hazards approach for resilience.
Key Components
- Four pillars: risk management, incident reporting, business continuity, corporate accountability.
- Strict reporting: 24-hour early warning, 72-hour notification, 1-month final report to CSIRTs.
- Continuous measures: supply chain security, access controls, encryption.
- Builds on standards like ISO 27001, NIST CSF; no formal certification but national enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory compliance avoids fines up to 2% global turnover.
- Enhances cyber resilience against threats like ransomware, APTs.
- Builds stakeholder trust, ensures business continuity.
- Strategic benefits: harmonized EU-wide cooperation, competitive edge in critical sectors.
Implementation Overview
- EU states transpose by October 2024; 12-18 month grace periods in some.
- Targets medium/large entities in covered sectors EU-wide.
- Involves risk assessments, training, governance, audits.
- Proactive: dynamic registers, spot checks, board oversight. (178 words)
GMP Details
What It Is
Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP) is a regulatory framework establishing minimum standards for manufacturing controls in pharmaceuticals, biologics, and related products. Its primary purpose is to ensure products are consistently produced to quality criteria, preventing contamination, mix-ups, and variability through preventive systems rather than end-testing alone. It adopts a risk-based approach via Quality Risk Management (QRM) and Pharmaceutical Quality Systems (PQS).
Key Components
- Core pillars: 5 Ps (People, Premises, Processes, Procedures, Products)
- Elements include quality management, personnel training, facility design, equipment validation, documentation, supplier controls, and continual improvement (CAPA, audits)
- Built on ICH Q9/Q10, FDA 21 CFR 210/211, EU EudraLex Volume 4, WHO GMP
- Compliance via inspections, no central certification but enforceable legally
Why Organizations Use It
GMP is mandatory for regulated industries to meet legal requirements, protect patients, avoid recalls/fines, and secure market access. It reduces risks, enhances efficiency, builds stakeholder trust, and supports global supply chains via harmonization (PIC/S, MRAs).
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, QMS design, validation (IQ/OQ/PQ), training, audits. Applies to manufacturers globally; intensive for pharma/biologics, scalable by size. Requires ongoing audits/inspections.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | GMP |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting, governance | Manufacturing controls, quality systems, process validation |
| Industry | Essential/important entities in EU sectors like energy, transport | Pharmaceuticals, biologics, food, cosmetics globally |
| Nature | Mandatory EU directive with national transposition | Regulatory standards enforced by FDA, EMA, WHO |
| Testing | Incident reporting timelines, risk assessments | Process/equipment validation, IQ/OQ/PQ, audits |
| Penalties | Up to 2% global turnover or €10M fines | Warning letters, recalls, import bans, fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and GMP
NIS2 FAQ
GMP FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt

Top 5 Reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 Overlays Unlock AI Risk Management for Private Sector Enterprises in 2025
Top 5 reasons NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5 AI overlays unlock risk management for private enterprises. Tailorable controls combat model poisoning & data leakage. CISO i

SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
OSHA vs PDPA
Dive into OSHA vs PDPA: Compare US workplace safety standards with Asia's data privacy laws. Unlock key differences, compliance tips, and strategies for global ops success now.
ISO 37301 vs 23 NYCRR 500
Unlock ISO 37301 vs 23 NYCRR 500: Certifiable CMS leadership & risk planning vs NYDFS cyber regs. Align for seamless compliance, audits & resilience. Expert comparison now!
ENERGY STAR vs AS9100
Discover ENERGY STAR vs AS9100: EPA's voluntary efficiency benchmark for products/buildings meets IAQG's rigorous aerospace QMS. Compare certifications, impacts & drive peak performance now!