Standards Comparison

    NIS2

    Mandatory
    2022

    EU directive strengthening cybersecurity resilience for critical sectors

    VS

    ISO 13485

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for medical device quality management systems.

    Quick Verdict

    NIS2 mandates EU cybersecurity resilience for critical sectors via risk management and rapid incident reporting, while ISO 13485 provides voluntary QMS certification for medical devices ensuring lifecycle compliance. Organizations adopt NIS2 for regulatory survival, ISO 13485 for global market access and quality excellence.

    Cybersecurity

    NIS2

    Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Expands scope via size-cap rule to medium/large entities
    • Mandates strict multi-stage incident reporting timelines
    • Imposes direct senior management accountability for compliance
    • Levies fines up to 2% of global annual turnover
    • Requires continuous risk management and supply chain security
    Quality Management

    ISO 13485

    ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based QMS controls for device lifecycle
    • Design and development controls with validation
    • Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
    • Supplier evaluation and outsourcing management
    • Traceability and medical device file requirements

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    NIS2 Details

    What It Is

    The NIS2 Directive, officially Directive (EU) 2022/2555, is an EU regulation expanding the original NIS Directive to achieve high cybersecurity levels across member states. It targets essential and important entities in broadened sectors like energy, transport, health, digital infrastructure, and public administration via a size-cap rule (50+ employees or €10M turnover). It adopts a risk-based, all-hazards approach emphasizing resilience and proactive measures.

    Key Components

    • **Risk managementOngoing assessments, supply chain security, access controls, encryption.
    • **Incident reporting24-hour early warning, 72-hour detailed notification, one-month final report to CSIRTs.
    • **Corporate accountabilitySenior management and boards directly responsible.
    • **Business continuityRecovery plans, crisis procedures.

    Enforced by national authorities with spot checks; transposition deadline October 2024.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets legal obligations, avoids fines up to €10M or 2% global turnover.
    • Builds cyber resilience against threats like APTs, ransomware.
    • Enhances trust, continuity, aligns with ISO 27001/NIST.
    • Supports cross-border cooperation.

    Implementation Overview

    Requires gap analysis, policy/process updates, training, reporting systems. Applies EU-wide to qualifying entities; ongoing monitoring essential. Tailor to national variations; leverage standards for efficiency. (178 words)

    ISO 13485 Details

    What It Is

    ISO 13485:2016, titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes, is an international certification standard for QMS in medical device organizations. It applies a risk-based approach across the device lifecycle, from design to post-market surveillance, ensuring consistent conformity to customer and regulatory requirements.

    Key Components

    • Organized into Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation (4), management responsibility (5), resources (6), product realization (7), measurement/improvement (8).
    • Emphasizes documented procedures, validation, traceability, risk management (linked to ISO 14971), supplier controls, and post-market activities.
    • Built on process approach; requires certification via accredited bodies with stage audits and surveillance.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026), reduces risks/recalls, ensures supply chain resilience.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, cuts cost of quality, supports scalability and regulatory convergence.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, documentation, validation, audits, certification (9–18 months typical).
    • Applies to manufacturers, suppliers, distributors globally; suits SMEs to multinationals via tailored scope.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    NIS2
    Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting, supply chain security
    ISO 13485
    Medical device QMS across design, production, post-market surveillance

    Industry

    NIS2
    Essential/important entities in EU sectors like energy, transport, health
    ISO 13485
    Global medical device manufacturers, suppliers, service providers

    Nature

    NIS2
    Mandatory EU regulation with national transposition
    ISO 13485
    Voluntary international certification standard for regulatory purposes

    Testing

    NIS2
    Incident reporting, national authority spot checks, continuous assurance
    ISO 13485
    Internal audits, certification body audits, process validation

    Penalties

    NIS2
    Fines up to 2% global turnover or €10M for essential entities
    ISO 13485
    Loss of certification, no direct legal fines

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about NIS2 and ISO 13485

    NIS2 FAQ

    ISO 13485 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages