NIS2
EU directive strengthening cybersecurity resilience for critical sectors
ISO 13485
International standard for medical device quality management systems.
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates EU cybersecurity resilience for critical sectors via risk management and rapid incident reporting, while ISO 13485 provides voluntary QMS certification for medical devices ensuring lifecycle compliance. Organizations adopt NIS2 for regulatory survival, ISO 13485 for global market access and quality excellence.
NIS2
Directive (EU) 2022/2555 (NIS2)
Key Features
- Expands scope via size-cap rule to medium/large entities
- Mandates strict multi-stage incident reporting timelines
- Imposes direct senior management accountability for compliance
- Levies fines up to 2% of global annual turnover
- Requires continuous risk management and supply chain security
ISO 13485
ISO 13485:2016 Medical devices Quality management systems
Key Features
- Risk-based QMS controls for device lifecycle
- Design and development controls with validation
- Post-market surveillance and complaint handling
- Supplier evaluation and outsourcing management
- Traceability and medical device file requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
The NIS2 Directive, officially Directive (EU) 2022/2555, is an EU regulation expanding the original NIS Directive to achieve high cybersecurity levels across member states. It targets essential and important entities in broadened sectors like energy, transport, health, digital infrastructure, and public administration via a size-cap rule (50+ employees or €10M turnover). It adopts a risk-based, all-hazards approach emphasizing resilience and proactive measures.
Key Components
- **Risk managementOngoing assessments, supply chain security, access controls, encryption.
- **Incident reporting24-hour early warning, 72-hour detailed notification, one-month final report to CSIRTs.
- **Corporate accountabilitySenior management and boards directly responsible.
- **Business continuityRecovery plans, crisis procedures.
Enforced by national authorities with spot checks; transposition deadline October 2024.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets legal obligations, avoids fines up to €10M or 2% global turnover.
- Builds cyber resilience against threats like APTs, ransomware.
- Enhances trust, continuity, aligns with ISO 27001/NIST.
- Supports cross-border cooperation.
Implementation Overview
Requires gap analysis, policy/process updates, training, reporting systems. Applies EU-wide to qualifying entities; ongoing monitoring essential. Tailor to national variations; leverage standards for efficiency. (178 words)
ISO 13485 Details
What It Is
ISO 13485:2016, titled Medical devices — Quality management systems — Requirements for regulatory purposes, is an international certification standard for QMS in medical device organizations. It applies a risk-based approach across the device lifecycle, from design to post-market surveillance, ensuring consistent conformity to customer and regulatory requirements.
Key Components
- Organized into Clauses 4–8: QMS/documentation (4), management responsibility (5), resources (6), product realization (7), measurement/improvement (8).
- Emphasizes documented procedures, validation, traceability, risk management (linked to ISO 14971), supplier controls, and post-market activities.
- Built on process approach; requires certification via accredited bodies with stage audits and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Enables market access (EU MDR, FDA QMSR alignment by 2026), reduces risks/recalls, ensures supply chain resilience.
- Builds stakeholder trust, cuts cost of quality, supports scalability and regulatory convergence.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, process design, documentation, validation, audits, certification (9–18 months typical).
- Applies to manufacturers, suppliers, distributors globally; suits SMEs to multinationals via tailored scope.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | ISO 13485 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting, supply chain security | Medical device QMS across design, production, post-market surveillance |
| Industry | Essential/important entities in EU sectors like energy, transport, health | Global medical device manufacturers, suppliers, service providers |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation with national transposition | Voluntary international certification standard for regulatory purposes |
| Testing | Incident reporting, national authority spot checks, continuous assurance | Internal audits, certification body audits, process validation |
| Penalties | Fines up to 2% global turnover or €10M for essential entities | Loss of certification, no direct legal fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and ISO 13485
NIS2 FAQ
ISO 13485 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency
Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo

The Reasons Why NIS2 is Fundamental for Cyber Resilience in Europe
Uncover why NIS2 transcends compliance burdens, delivering real cyber resilience value through enforced measurements and activities. Explore insights via our pa

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
EPA vs FISMA
Compare EPA vs FISMA: Unpack environmental regs (CAA, CWA, RCRA) vs federal cybersecurity mandates. Key differences, compliance strategies, risk insights. Explore now!
WCAG vs SOX
Compare WCAG vs SOX: Master web accessibility (WCAG 2.1 AA, POUR principles) & financial controls (SOX 404 ICFR). Cut risks, ensure compliance. Unlock strategies now!
PRINCE2 vs ISO 30301
PRINCE2 vs ISO 30301: Compare project governance powerhouse with records management mastery. Boost compliance, efficiency, and strategic control. Discover key differences now!