NIS2
EU directive for cybersecurity resilience in critical sectors
ISO 19600
International guidelines for compliance management systems
Quick Verdict
NIS2 mandates cybersecurity resilience for EU critical sectors with strict reporting and fines, while ISO 19600 provides voluntary guidelines for building compliance management systems globally. Companies adopt NIS2 for regulatory compliance, ISO 19600 for scalable risk frameworks.
NIS2
Network and Information Systems Directive 2 (NIS2)
Key Features
- Implements size-cap rule for medium/large entities in sectors
- Mandates strict multi-stage incident reporting timelines
- Enforces direct senior management accountability
- Imposes fines up to 2% global annual turnover
- Requires continuous risk management and supply chain security
ISO 19600
ISO 19600:2014 Compliance management systems — Guidelines
Key Features
- Risk-based CMS framework with PDCA cycle
- Principles of good governance and proportionality
- Scalable to all organization sizes and sectors
- Annex SL structure for management system integration
- Non-certifiable guidelines preparing for ISO 37301
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIS2 Details
What It Is
NIS2 Directive (EU) 2022/2555 is an EU regulation expanding the original NIS Directive. It establishes a high common level of cybersecurity across member states, targeting essential and important entities in critical sectors like energy, transport, health, and digital services. NIS2 adopts a risk-based approach with continuous assurance, moving beyond static compliance.
Key Components
- Four pillars: risk management, incident reporting, business continuity, corporate accountability.
- Strict timelines: 24-hour early warnings, 72-hour notifications, one-month final reports.
- Supply chain security, access controls, encryption; leverages standards like ISO 27001.
- No formal certification; compliance via national transposition and audits.
Why Organizations Use It
Essential for legal compliance to avoid fines up to 2% global turnover. Enhances resilience against threats, ensures service continuity, builds stakeholder trust. Provides competitive edge through proactive cybersecurity in interconnected sectors.
Implementation Overview
Assess scope via size-cap (50+ employees or €10M turnover). Implement risk assessments, reporting procedures, governance. Tailor to national laws post-October 2024 transposition. Enterprise-wide transformation with training, tech upgrades; ongoing spot checks required. (178 words)
ISO 19600 Details
What It Is
ISO 19600:2014 — Compliance management systems — Guidelines is a Type B guidance standard from the International Organization for Standardization. It provides recommendations for establishing, implementing, evaluating, maintaining, and improving a Compliance Management System (CMS). The risk-based approach follows the Annex SL high-level structure with 10 clauses, applicable to all organizations.
Key Components
- Core principles: good governance, proportionality, transparency, sustainability.
- Pillars: context analysis, leadership, planning, support, operation, performance evaluation, improvement.
- PDCA cycle for continual enhancement.
- No mandatory requirements; non-certifiable benchmarking tool.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates legal, regulatory, reputational risks; reduces penalties and disruptions.
- Drives operational efficiency (10-20% cost savings), market access, cultural integrity.
- Enhances stakeholder trust, competitive edge; prepares for ISO 37301 certification.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased roadmapleadership commitment, gap analysis, design, rollout, continuous improvement.
- Scalable for SMEs to multinationals, all sectors/geographies.
- Involves policy development, risk registers, training, audits; no formal certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIS2 | ISO 19600 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management, incident reporting for critical sectors | Compliance management systems across all obligations |
| Industry | Essential/important entities in EU sectors like energy, transport | All industries, organizations worldwide, any size |
| Nature | Mandatory EU directive with national transposition | Voluntary guidelines (withdrawn, replaced by ISO 37301) |
| Testing | National authority spot checks, incident reporting timelines | Internal audits, management reviews, self-assessments |
| Penalties | Fines up to 2% global turnover or €10M | No legal penalties, internal benchmarking only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIS2 and ISO 19600
NIS2 FAQ
ISO 19600 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality
Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide
Step-by-Step Implementation Guide to ISO 27701: Building a Privacy Information Management System (PIMS) on Your ISO 27001 Foundation
Implement ISO 27701 on your ISO 27001 foundation with this actionable guide. Tackle PII controls, audit evidence, GDPR integration. Templates, checklists for 20
Thailand PDPA Enforcement Trends 2025: Analyzing 1,048 Complaints, Breach Volumes, and Hidden Lessons for Proactive Compliance
Decode PDPC Thailand's 1,048 complaints & 610 breaches. Uncover consent/security violations, project 2025 enforcement. Risk heatmap, self-assessment & playbook
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PIPL vs CMMI
Discover PIPL vs CMMI: China's GDPR-like privacy law meets proven process maturity model. Unlock compliance strategies, risk mitigation, and business gains for China ops. Compare now!
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 27701
Discover ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 27701: AI risks, PDCA governance & bias controls meet PII privacy. Integrate for ethical AI, compliance & trust. Dive in!
Australian Privacy Act vs ISO 27017
Compare Australian Privacy Act vs ISO 27017: Principles-based privacy rules meet cloud security controls. Key differences, compliance tips & strategies for secure data handling. Read now!