NIST 800-171
U.S. standard protecting CUI in nonfederal systems
EMAS
EU voluntary regulation for environmental management and audit
Quick Verdict
NIST 800-171 mandates CUI protection for US defense contractors via controls and audits, ensuring contract eligibility. EMAS drives voluntary EU environmental improvement through verified EMS and public statements, boosting reputation and efficiency.
NIST 800-171
NIST SP 800-171r3: Protecting CUI in Nonfederal Systems
Key Features
- Tailored controls protect CUI in nonfederal systems
- Scoped to CUI components enabling enclave isolation
- Mandates SSP and POA&M for implementation tracking
- 17 families including supply chain risk management
- Assessment via examine/interview/test procedures
EMAS
Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 Eco-Management and Audit Scheme
Key Features
- Verified legal compliance statements
- Mandatory public environmental statements
- Core performance indicators for comparability
- Independent verifier validation and registration
- Continuous environmental performance improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIST 800-171 Details
What It Is
NIST SP 800-171r3 is a U.S. government framework providing security requirements to protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) confidentiality in nonfederal systems. Its primary scope targets federal contractors and supply chains, using a control-based approach tailored from SP 800-53 Moderate baseline.
Key Components
- 97 requirements across 17 families (e.g., Access Control, Audit, Supply Chain Risk Management).
- Built on FIPS 200 and SP 800-53r5 principles.
- Compliance via SSP and POA&M documentation; assessed using SP 800-171A procedures (examine/interview/test).
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for DoD via DFARS 252.204-7012 handling CUI.
- Reduces breach risks, ensures contract eligibility.
- Builds stakeholder trust, enables CMMC Level 2 readiness.
- Strategic for supply chain competitiveness.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: scope CUI enclave, gap analysis, implement controls (MFA, SIEM), document SSP/POA&M. Applies to contractors globally; audits via self or C3PAO. Timelines 6-18 months typical.
EMAS Details
What It Is
EMAS (Eco-Management and Audit Scheme) is an EU Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 voluntary environmental management framework. It enables organizations to evaluate, report, and improve environmental performance through a structured Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, incorporating ISO 14001 EMS requirements with added verification and transparency.
Key Components
- Initial environmental review, EMS implementation, internal audits, management review, public environmental statement.
- Core indicators for energy, materials, water, waste, biodiversity, emissions.
- Built on ISO 14001 plus verified legal compliance and Sectoral Reference Documents (SRDs).
- Registration via national Competent Bodies after independent verifier validation.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives resource efficiency and cost savings.
- Ensures verified legal compliance reducing risks.
- Enhances stakeholder trust via transparent reporting.
- Supports ESG/CSRD synergies and procurement advantages.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, EMS design, verification, registration.
- Applies to all sizes/sectors in EU/global.
- Requires accredited verifiers for initial/renewal audits every 3 years (SME flexibilities).
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIST 800-171 | EMAS |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | CUI confidentiality in nonfederal systems | Environmental performance management and reporting |
| Industry | Defense contractors, federal supply chains (US) | All sectors, EU organizations voluntary |
| Nature | Contractual security requirements (recommendatory) | Voluntary EU regulation with registration |
| Testing | Self-assessments, CMMC audits, SPRS scoring | Internal audits, independent verifier validation |
| Penalties | Contract ineligibility, DFARS non-compliance | Registration suspension/deletion, no fines |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIST 800-171 and EMAS
NIST 800-171 FAQ
EMAS FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...
Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws
Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FERPA vs POPIA
Discover FERPA vs POPIA: Compare US student privacy law with South Africa's data protection act. Unpack rights, compliance, and strategies for educators worldwide. Safeguard data now!
UL Certification vs ISA 95
Compare UL Certification's safety marks & audits vs ISA-95's enterprise-MES integration models. Discover key differences, benefits & implementation for manufacturing excellence.
COBIT vs Basel III
COBIT vs Basel III: Compare IT governance framework with banking capital/liquidity rules. Align enterprise IT for compliance, risk optimization & resilient ops. Discover key insights now!