NIST 800-53
Federal catalog of security and privacy controls
Basel III
Global framework strengthening bank capital, leverage, liquidity standards.
Quick Verdict
NIST 800-53 offers flexible security/privacy controls for all organizations via RMF, while Basel III mandates capital/liquidity standards for banks. Companies adopt NIST for robust cybersecurity; Basel for regulatory compliance and financial resilience.
NIST 800-53
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Security and Privacy Controls
Key Features
- Unified 20-family catalog integrating security and privacy
- Outcome-based controls enabling flexible tailoring
- Low/moderate/high baselines plus privacy baseline
- Risk Management Framework (RMF) lifecycle integration
- OSCAL machine-readable formats for automation
Basel III
Basel III international prudential framework
Key Features
- Strengthened CET1 capital minimum at 4.5% of RWAs
- Non-risk-based leverage ratio minimum of 3%
- Liquidity Coverage Ratio for 30-day stress survival
- Net Stable Funding Ratio for structural funding
- Output floor limiting internal model RWA benefits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIST 800-53 Details
What It Is
NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 is the U.S. federal government's primary catalog of security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations. It provides a flexible, outcome-based framework to protect against diverse threats, emphasizing risk management over checklists.
Key Components
- 20 control families (e.g., AC, AU, PT, SR) with over 1,100 base controls and enhancements.
- Baselines in SP 800-53B: low/moderate/high impact plus privacy baseline.
- Organization-defined parameters, supplemental guidance, and OSCAL machine-readable formats.
- Integrated with SP 800-53A assessments and RMF (SP 800-37).
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets FISMA/OMB A-130 mandates for federal systems/contractors.
- Enhances risk management, resilience, and reciprocity.
- Builds trust via audit-ready evidence; enables cross-framework mappings (CSF, ISO 27001).
- Supports supply chain and privacy risks strategically.
Implementation Overview
- **RMF lifecyclecategorize, select/tailor baselines, implement, assess, authorize, monitor.
- Phased rollout with automation (OSCAL, tools); applies to any organization size/industry.
- No formal certification; compliance via authorization to operate (ATO) and audits. (178 words)
Basel III Details
What It Is
Basel III is the international prudential regulatory framework developed by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) post-2007 financial crisis. It sets minimum standards to enhance bank resilience through improved capital quality and quantity, leverage constraints, and liquidity requirements, using a risk-based approach with standardized and internal models.
Key Components
- **Three PillarsPillar 1 (capital, leverage, liquidity ratios like CET1 4.5%, leverage 3%, LCR/NSFR 100%); Pillar 2 (supervisory review, ICAAP); Pillar 3 (disclosures for comparability).
- Revised risk approaches (credit, market, operational) with output floor (72.5%).
- Buffers: conservation (2.5%), countercyclical, G-SIB/D-SIB.
- Compliance via national implementation, no central certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Banks adopt for regulatory compliance, avoiding fines and restrictions. Benefits include enhanced resilience, lower funding costs, accurate risk pricing, and competitive edge via robust governance. Builds stakeholder trust amid supervisory scrutiny.
Implementation Overview
Phased enterprise transformation: governance setup, gap analysis, data/models build, testing, deployment. Targets internationally active/large banks globally; involves PMO, IT upgrades, training. Audits via supervisors, Pillar 3 reporting.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIST 800-53 | Basel III |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Security/privacy controls for info systems | Bank capital, liquidity, leverage standards |
| Industry | All sectors, federal/non-federal, global voluntary | Banks/financial institutions, international standards |
| Nature | Voluntary control catalog, risk management framework | Mandatory prudential regulation via national laws |
| Testing | RMF assessments, continuous monitoring, OSCAL | ICAAP stress tests, supervisory reviews, QIS |
| Penalties | No direct penalties, audit/contractual risks | Fines, capital add-ons, business restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIST 800-53 and Basel III
NIST 800-53 FAQ
Basel III FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder with Real-World Analogies
Decode SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria (Security, Availability, Confidentiality, Processing Integrity, Privacy) into plain English with tables, TL;DRs & analogies

ISO 27701 Standalone Certification in 2025: Debunking Myths and Navigating the New Reality
Debunk myths on ISO 27701 standalone certification post-2025. Clarify viability, accreditation bodies, ISO 27001 audit differences & procurement benefits. Guide

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Extending Your ISMS to PIMS in 12 Months or Less
Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS in 12 months with our phased roadmap. Templates, checklists & infographics for RoPA, DSARs & audit-ready privacy complia
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
REACH vs EN 1090
REACH vs EN 1090: EU chemicals regulation for SVHC risk management vs steel/aluminium standards for CE marking & FPC. Key differences, compliance strategies to secure EU market access.
CE Marking vs AS9120B
Compare CE Marking vs AS9120B: EU product safety vs aerospace QMS. Uncover key differences, compliance steps & strategies for distributors entering EU markets. Secure certification success!
APPI vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
APPI vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules: Compare Japan's data privacy law with SEC's incident disclosure mandates. Expert strategies for compliance, risk management & global ops.