What is the primary objective of **NIST 800-53**?

**NIST SP 800-53 provides a catalog of security and privacy controls to protect organizational operations, assets, individuals, other organizations, and the Nation from diverse threats and risks.** Revision 5 organizes **1,100+ controls** into **20 families** (e.g., AC Access Control, AU Audit and Accountability, SR Supply Chain Risk Management), emphasizing **confidentiality, integrity, availability (CIA)** and privacy risks like PII processing. Controls are outcome-based, flexible, and integrated with the **Risk Management Framework (RMF)** in SP 800-37 for risk-informed selection, tailoring, implementation, assessment (SP 800-53A), authorization, and monitoring.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **NIST 800-53**?

**Federal agencies and contractors processing federal information are legally required to implement NIST SP 800-53 controls under FISMA and OMB A-130.** SP 800-53B mandates baselines (Low/Moderate/High per FIPS 199 impact levels) for federal systems. Contractors face contractual obligations (e.g., FedRAMP), while non-federal entities (critical infrastructure, cloud providers) adopt voluntarily for robust governance, reciprocity, and supply chain assurance.

Does **NIST 800-53** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, NIST SP 800-53 does not mandate external audits or third-party certification; it requires internal assessment of control effectiveness using SP 800-53A procedures.** Organizations conduct assessments via RMF steps (assess, authorize, monitor), documenting evidence in Security Assessment Reports (SARs) and Plans of Action and Milestones (POA&Ms). Authorizing Officials grant Authorization to Operate (ATO) based on defensible risk decisions; external validation applies in contexts like FedRAMP.

How often should an assessment for **NIST 800-53** be performed?

**NIST SP 800-53 assessments occur continuously via RMF monitoring, with full reassessments at least annually or upon significant changes.** SP 800-53A defines procedures for ongoing verification of **CA-7 Continuous Monitoring**, prioritizing high-impact controls (e.g., AU-6 audit review). Frequencies vary by risk: real-time for critical controls, quarterly for moderate, annual for low, ensuring tailored, evidence-driven effectiveness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **NIST 800-53**?

**Non-compliance with NIST SP 800-53 for federal entities risks FISMA violations, contract termination, fines, and loss of Authorization to Operate (ATO).** Agencies face OMB oversight, Inspector General audits, and funding cuts; contractors encounter debarment, remediation costs, and breach amplification from weak controls (e.g., inadequate SR family supply chain protections). Residual risks include operational disruptions and heightened threats.

Can **NIST 800-53** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 provides official mappings to frameworks like NIST CSF 2.0, NIST Privacy Framework, and ISO/IEC 27001:2022.** SP 800-53B and NIST OLIR crosswalks indicate coverage relationships for gap analysis and multi-framework reporting, but mappings show alignment—not strict equivalency—requiring validation for specific requirements.

What is the first step to begin implementing **NIST 800-53**?

**The first step is system categorization per FIPS 199 to determine impact level (Low/Moderate/High) for baseline selection in SP 800-53B.** This RMF Prepare step identifies CIA and privacy risks, informing tailored control selection from the 20-family catalog, followed by risk assessment (RA family) and documentation in security/privacy plans.

What is the primary objective of **ISO 27017**?

**ISO 27017 provides cloud-specific implementation guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls plus 7 additional cloud-focused controls (CLD.6.3.1, CLD.8.1.5, CLD.9.5.1, CLD.9.5.2, CLD.12.1.5, CLD.12.4.5, CLD.13.1.4).** Published in 2015, it addresses shared responsibilities between **cloud service providers (CSPs)** and **cloud service customers (CSCs)**, covering multi-tenancy segregation, virtual machine hardening, asset removal/return, administrative operations, customer monitoring, and network security alignment in IaaS, PaaS, and SaaS models.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **ISO 27017**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with ISO 27017, as it is a voluntary code of practice.** Professionally, **CSPs** and **CSCs** with significant cloud footprints adopt it to demonstrate due diligence, especially in regulated sectors or procurement demanding cloud security assurance; ~94% of organizations use cloud, with 61% reporting incidents driving its use within ISO 27001 ISMS.

Does **ISO 27017** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**ISO 27017 does not support standalone third-party certification or external audit.** It is implemented within an **ISO 27001** ISMS, where auditors assess its 37+7 controls during ISO 27001 Stage 1/2 audits; certification bodies may reference ISO 27017 conformity as an extension on ISO 27001 certificates.

How often should an assessment for **ISO 27017** be performed?

**ISO 27017 assessments occur as part of annual ISO 27001 surveillance audits and triennial re-certification.** Controls are reviewed continuously via risk assessments, with changes (e.g., new cloud services) triggering ad-hoc evaluations to maintain ISMS effectiveness.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **ISO 27017**?

**Non-compliance with ISO 27017 carries no direct legal penalties, as it is non-mandatory.** Indirect risks include failed ISO 27001 certification, lost procurement opportunities, heightened breach exposure from unaddressed cloud risks (e.g., multi-tenancy gaps), and regulatory scrutiny under data laws where cloud incidents demonstrate inadequate controls.

Can **ISO 27017** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, ISO 27017 maps seamlessly to ISO 27001/27002 as its foundational extension.** Its 37+7 controls align with NIST SP 800-53, CSA STAR, SOC 2, and PCI-DSS via shared themes like shared responsibility and segregation; 70% of CSPs map it for cross-framework compliance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **ISO 27017**?

**Conduct a cloud-specific risk assessment within your ISO 27001 ISMS scope.** Identify cloud risks (e.g., shared responsibilities, multi-tenancy), map to 37 ISO 27002 controls plus 7 CLD controls, and update the Statement of Applicability to select and justify implementations for CSP/CSC roles.

NIST 800-53 vs ISO 27017

Standards Comparison

NIST 800-53

Mandatory

2020

U.S. catalog of security and privacy controls

ISO 27017

Voluntary

2015

International code of practice for cloud security controls

Quick Verdict

NIST 800-53 offers comprehensive security/privacy controls for federal systems via RMF, while ISO 27017 provides cloud-specific guidance extending ISO 27001. Organizations adopt NIST for rigorous baselines, ISO 27017 for shared cloud responsibilities and global audits.

Security Controls

NIST 800-53

NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Security and Privacy Controls

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

20 control families integrating security and privacy
Tailorable baselines for low/moderate/high impact levels
Outcome-based controls without assigned responsibilities
Supply Chain Risk Management (SR) family
OSCAL machine-readable formats for automation

Cloud Security

ISO 27017

ISO/IEC 27017:2015

Cost

€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Clarifies shared responsibilities between CSPs and CSCs
Introduces 7 cloud-specific CLD security controls
Provides guidance for 37 ISO 27002 controls in cloud
Addresses multi-tenancy segregation and VM hardening
Supports customer monitoring of cloud service activities

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

NIST 800-53 Details

What It Is

NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 is the U.S. federal government's primary catalog of security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations. It provides a risk-based framework with flexible, outcome-oriented controls to protect against diverse threats including cyber attacks, human errors, and privacy risks. Scope covers federal systems but extends voluntarily to others.

Key Components

20 control families (e.g., AC, AU, SR, PT) with over 1,100 base controls and enhancements.
Baselines in SP 800-53B: low/moderate/high impact plus privacy baseline.
Tailoring, overlays, parameters for customization.
Integrated with RMF (SP 800-37); no formal certification but FISMA-mandated compliance via assessments (SP 800-53A).

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for federal agencies/contractors under FISMA/OMB A-130.
Manages CIA and privacy risks; enables reciprocity and automation via OSCAL.
Builds trust, supports FedRAMP, reduces breach impacts.

Implementation Overview

**RMF lifecyclecategorize, select/tailor baselines, implement, assess, authorize, monitor.
Applies to any organization; high complexity suits enterprises.
Requires documentation, automation, continuous monitoring; audits via 800-53A procedures.

ISO 27017 Details

What It Is

ISO/IEC 27017:2015 is a code of practice providing cloud-specific guidance for information security controls. It extends ISO/IEC 27002 for cloud services (IaaS, PaaS, SaaS), clarifying responsibilities for CSPs and CSCs. It uses a risk-based approach within an ISO 27001 ISMS.

Key Components

37 adapted ISO 27002 controls with cloud implementation guidance.
7 new CLD controls (e.g., shared roles CLD.6.3.1, VM segregation CLD.9.5.1).
Built on ISO 27001/27002; no standalone certification—assessed via ISO 27001 audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Tackles cloud risks like multi-tenancy, shared responsibility.
Supports regulatory compliance (GDPR, CCPA), procurement demands.
Boosts risk management, customer trust, competitive differentiation for CSPs.

Implementation Overview

Integrate into ISO 27001 ISMS via risk assessment, control mapping, SoA updates.
Key steps: define shared responsibilities, configure VM hardening, enable monitoring.
Applies globally to cloud users/providers; joint audits take 9-12 months.

Key Differences

Aspect	NIST 800-53	ISO 27017
Scope	Comprehensive security/privacy controls catalog, 20 families	Cloud-specific guidance extending ISO 27002, 7 CLD controls
Industry	Federal, contractors, critical infrastructure, global voluntary	Cloud providers/customers, all industries, global applicability
Nature	Voluntary control catalog with baselines, RMF integration	Voluntary code of practice, ISO 27001 extension
Testing	SP 800-53A assessments, continuous monitoring, RMF audits	Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, no standalone certification
Penalties	No direct penalties, FISMA/contractual consequences	No legal penalties, certification loss/reputational risk

Scope

NIST 800-53

Comprehensive security/privacy controls catalog, 20 families

ISO 27017

Cloud-specific guidance extending ISO 27002, 7 CLD controls

Industry

NIST 800-53

Federal, contractors, critical infrastructure, global voluntary

ISO 27017

Cloud providers/customers, all industries, global applicability

Nature

NIST 800-53

Voluntary control catalog with baselines, RMF integration

ISO 27017

Voluntary code of practice, ISO 27001 extension

Testing

NIST 800-53

SP 800-53A assessments, continuous monitoring, RMF audits

ISO 27017

Integrated into ISO 27001 audits, no standalone certification

Penalties

NIST 800-53

No direct penalties, FISMA/contractual consequences

ISO 27017

No legal penalties, certification loss/reputational risk

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about NIST 800-53 and ISO 27017

NIST 800-53 FAQ

ISO 27017 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

Explore top 5 advantages of HITRUST MyCSF for 1,400+ R2 controls in hybrid clouds. Slash docs by 30%, dodge under-scoping, achieve continuous compliance for hea

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27018 vs NERC CIP

ISO 27018 vs NERC CIP: Compare cloud PII privacy standards with BES cybersecurity mandates. Discover key differences, compliance strategies, audits & risks for grid ops.

CSA vs AS9110C

Compare CSA (Z1000/Z1002 OHS) vs AS9110C aerospace QMS: differences in risk mgmt, compliance, audits & implementation for MRO safety. Optimize yours today!

DORA vs HITRUST CSF

Discover DORA vs HITRUST CSF: EU finance ICT resilience act meets certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ standards. Compare scopes, testing, third-party risks & maturity models for smart compliance. Choose wisely!

NIST 800-53

ISO 27017

Quick Verdict

NIST 800-53

Key Features

ISO 27017

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

NIST 800-53 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

ISO 27017 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

NIST 800-53 FAQ

What is the primary objective of NIST 800-53?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with NIST 800-53?

Does NIST 800-53 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for NIST 800-53 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with NIST 800-53?

Can NIST 800-53 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing NIST 800-53?

ISO 27017 FAQ

What is the primary objective of ISO 27017?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with ISO 27017?

Does ISO 27017 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for ISO 27017 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with ISO 27017?

Can ISO 27017 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing ISO 27017?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...

Top 5 Reasons HITRUST CSF's MyCSF Platform Crushes Evidence Overload for R2 Assessments in Hybrid Cloud Environments

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27018 vs NERC CIP

CSA vs AS9110C

DORA vs HITRUST CSF