CSA
Consensus standards for OHS management and hazard control
AS9110C
International standard for aircraft MRO quality management.
Quick Verdict
CSA provides OHS management standards for hazard control across industries, while AS9110C is a certification QMS for aerospace MRO ensuring airworthiness and traceability. Organizations adopt CSA for safety compliance, AS9110C for aviation contracts and regulatory alignment.
CSA
CSA Z1000 Occupational Health and Safety Management
Key Features
- SCC-accredited consensus-based development with public review
- PDCA management system framework for OHS (Z1000)
- Structured hazard identification and risk assessment (Z1002)
- Hazard classification across biological to psychosocial categories
- Hierarchy of controls prioritizing elimination and engineering
AS9110C
AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance
Key Features
- Risk-based thinking embedded in planning and operations
- Configuration management and part traceability controls
- Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention program
- Human factors integration in competence and audits
- Regulatory alignment with FAA/EASA Part-145 requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
CSA Details
What It Is
CSA Group standards like CSA Z1000-14 (R2019) and CSA Z1002-12 (R2022) are consensus-based Canadian frameworks for occupational health and safety (OHS). Primarily voluntary, they become mandatory via regulatory incorporation by reference. Z1000 provides a PDCA management system; Z1002 details risk-based hazard identification and control.
Key Components
- Leadership commitment, planning, implementation, checking, management review (Z1000 PDCA).
- Hazard classification: biological, chemical, ergonomic, physical, psychosocial, safety (Z1002).
- Risk prioritization by severity, likelihood, exposure.
- Hierarchy of controls (elimination first).
- Worker participation, audits; SCC-accredited certification available.
Why Organizations Use It
Meets OHS legal duties, demonstrates due diligence, reduces incidents/fines. Enables policy efficiency, market access, continual improvement. Builds regulator, worker, stakeholder trust.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, policy development, training, hazard processes, audits. Suits all sizes/industries (manufacturing, construction, energy); Canada-focused with global alignment. Involves internal audits, optional third-party certification.
AS9110C Details
What It Is
AS9110C is the international quality management system (QMS) standard for aviation maintenance, repair, and overhaul (MRO) organizations. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements, using a risk-based thinking (RBT) approach and PDCA cycle to ensure safe, compliant maintenance services.
Key Components
- Core clauses 4-10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Maintenance-focused controls: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, and release-to-service.
- Built on IAQG's High Level Structure (HLS); voluntary certification via accredited registrars.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignments (e.g., FAA/EASA Part-145).
- Mitigates safety risks, reduces rework, improves on-time delivery.
- Enhances market access, supply-chain credibility, and operational efficiency.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, process design, training, internal audits, certification.
- Applies to MROs of all sizes in aerospace; requires 3+ months operational data pre-audit. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | CSA | AS9110C |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | OHS management, hazard ID, risk assessment across HES | Aerospace MRO QMS, maintenance, configuration, airworthiness |
| Industry | All industries, Canada-focused, global alignment | Aviation maintenance organizations worldwide |
| Nature | Voluntary consensus standards, regulatory reference | Certification QMS standard based on ISO 9001 |
| Testing | Internal audits, management reviews, SCC accreditation | Internal audits, Stage 1/2 certification audits, surveillance |
| Penalties | Fines via regulation reference, due diligence exposure | Loss of certification, contract ineligibility, regulatory sanctions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about CSA and AS9110C
CSA FAQ
AS9110C FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

The Panoramic View: How Integrated Compliance Monitoring Creates Unprecedented Organizational Visibility and Adaptability
Gain unprecedented organizational visibility with integrated compliance monitoring. Automate real-time alerts, ensure GDPR & SOC 2 adherence, reduce risks, and

Your Guide to Implementing PCI DSS in Your Organization
Step-by-step guide to implementing PCI DSS in your organization. Achieve compliance, protect cardholder data, and reduce risks. Start securing payments today!
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PIPEDA vs ISO 21001
Compare PIPEDA vs ISO 21001: Canada's privacy law enforces 10 data principles for consent & safeguards, while ISO 21001 drives learner-centric EOMS. Achieve compliance mastery!
ISO 45001 vs IFS Food
Discover ISO 45001 vs IFS Food: Compare OH&S leadership, risk controls & food safety standards for integrated compliance. Boost performance & safety now!
WEEE vs WELL
WEEE vs WELL: EU e-waste Directive (collection targets, EPR) vs health-focused building standard (air, light, mind). Key differences, compliance tips & strategies. Dive in!