NIST 800-53
U.S. federal catalog of security and privacy controls
SQF
GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management.
Quick Verdict
NIST 800-53 provides flexible security/privacy controls for federal systems and adopters managing info risks, while SQF delivers HACCP-based food safety certification for manufacturers ensuring market access and recall prevention. Organizations adopt them for compliance, risk management, and supply chain trust.
NIST 800-53
NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5: Security and Privacy Controls
Key Features
- Comprehensive catalog of 20 security/privacy control families
- Risk-based baselines for low/moderate/high impact levels
- Outcome-based controls enabling flexible, role-neutral implementation
- Integrated privacy baseline applied irrespective of impact
- OSCAL machine-readable formats for automated compliance
SQF
SQF Food Safety Code Edition 9
Key Features
- Modular structure: Module 2 plus sector-specific GMPs
- HACCP-based Food Safety Plan with validation
- GFSI-benchmarked for global retailer recognition
- Designated full-time SQF Practitioner requirement
- Graded audits with unannounced and scoring system
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIST 800-53 Details
What It Is
NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 is the U.S. federal government's primary control catalog for security and privacy in information systems and organizations. Its primary purpose is to provide flexible, customizable safeguards protecting confidentiality, integrity, availability (CIA) and privacy risks. It employs a risk-based, outcome-oriented approach integrated with the Risk Management Framework (RMF).
Key Components
- Organized into 20 control families (e.g., AC, AU, SR, PT) with over 1,100 base controls and enhancements.
- Baselines in SP 800-53B: Low, Moderate, High impact plus Privacy baseline.
- Parameters, enhancements, guidance; OSCAL for machine-readable formats.
- Compliance via **RMF lifecyclecategorize, select, implement, assess, authorize, monitor.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for federal agencies under FISMA/OMB A-130; contractual for contractors.
- Manages diverse threats including supply chain and privacy risks.
- Enables reciprocal authorizations, operational resilience, and cross-framework mappings (CSF, ISO 27001).
- Builds stakeholder trust and competitive edge in regulated sectors.
Implementation Overview
- Phased RMF approach: categorize systems, select/tailor baselines, automate evidence.
- Applies to federal/non-federal; all sizes via overlays.
- No certification; assessments per SP 800-53A, continuous monitoring required.
SQF Details
What It Is
Safe Quality Food (SQF) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification program administered by SQFI. It provides a rigorous, HACCP-based framework for ensuring food safety and quality across the supply chain, from farm to fork, via modular codes tailored to sectors like manufacturing and storage.
Key Components
- **Modular structureUniversal Module 2 (System Elements) plus sector-specific GMP modules (e.g., Module 11 for processing).
- Over 100 auditable clauses covering management commitment, HACCP plans, PRPs, verification, traceability, allergens, and food defense.
- Built on Codex HACCP principles; requires SQF Practitioner designation.
- Certification via third-party audits with scoring (E/G/C/F grades).
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets retailer mandates for market access.
- Reduces recalls, audit duplication, and supply risks.
- Enhances due diligence, GFSI recognition, and food safety culture.
- Builds stakeholder trust via transparent certification.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification.
- Applies to food manufacturers, distributors; scalable by size.
- Annual audits with unannounced options; 6-12 months typical timeline. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIST 800-53 | SQF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Security/privacy controls for info systems | Food safety/quality management systems |
| Industry | Federal, contractors, critical infrastructure | Food manufacturing, storage, distribution |
| Nature | Voluntary control catalog/framework | GFSI-benchmarked certification program |
| Testing | RMF assessments, continuous monitoring | Annual third-party audits, unannounced |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, contract risks | Loss of certification, market exclusion |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIST 800-53 and SQF
NIST 800-53 FAQ
SQF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Decoding Tomorrow's Regulations: How Advanced Compliance Tools Predict and Prepare for Future Shifts
Advanced compliance tools use AI, analytics & real-time monitoring to predict regulatory shifts, cut non-compliance costs 3x, and ensure audit readiness. Stay p
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 Private Sector Tailoring Blueprint: First 5 Steps to Overlay-Driven Compliance with Infographic
Step-by-step blueprint for private sector NIST SP 800-53 Rev 5.1 tailoring using overlays for AI & supply chain risks. Infographic + first 5 steps for ROI-drive
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CMMC vs AS9120B
Compare CMMC vs AS9120B: Decode cybersecurity maturity for DoD contracts vs aerospace quality for distributors. Key differences, compliance roadmaps, and strategies to secure supply chains. Certify smarter now!
WEEE vs ISA 95
Discover WEEE vs ISA 95: Compare EU e-waste regs with manufacturing standards. Boost compliance, circular strategy & ops for electronics leaders. Dive in now!
SQF vs NERC CIP
Compare SQF vs NERC CIP: Food safety certification meets grid cybersecurity. Key differences, compliance tips, and strategies to master both standards. Optimize now!