NIST CSF
Voluntary framework for cybersecurity risk management
DORA
EU regulation for digital operational resilience in financial sector
Quick Verdict
NIST CSF offers voluntary, flexible cybersecurity risk management for all organizations globally, while DORA mandates strict ICT resilience testing and reporting for EU financial entities. Companies adopt CSF for best practices and strategic alignment; DORA ensures regulatory compliance.
NIST CSF
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Key Features
- Introduces Govern function as overarching governance pillar
- Framework Profiles enable current-target gap analysis
- Implementation Tiers assess risk management maturity
- Non-prescriptive outcomes mapped to global standards
- Common language for stakeholder risk communication
DORA
Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, Digital Operational Resilience Act
Key Features
- Comprehensive ICT risk management frameworks
- Mandatory incident reporting within 4 hours
- Threat-led penetration testing (TLPT) every 3 years
- Oversight of critical third-party providers
- Harmonized resilience standards across EU finance
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIST CSF Details
What It Is
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (CSF 2.0) is a voluntary, risk-based guideline from the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. It offers a flexible, structured approach to identify, assess, and manage cybersecurity risks for organizations of any size or sector, evolving from critical infrastructure focus to universal applicability.
Key Components
- **Framework CoreSix Functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover) with 22 Categories and 112 Subcategories, plus informative references to standards like ISO 27001.
- **Implementation TiersFour levels (Partial, Risk-Informed, Repeatable, Adaptive) to characterize risk practices.
- **Framework ProfilesCurrent and Target alignments for prioritization. No formal certification; relies on self-assessment.
Why Organizations Use It
Establishes a common language for risk discussions, enables cost-effective prioritization, demonstrates due care, and supports supply chain management. Integrates cybersecurity into enterprise risk strategies, fosters stakeholder trust, and aligns with regulations for federal contractors.
Implementation Overview
Create Profiles for gap analysis, apply Tiers for maturity, map to existing controls. Iterative process using free NIST resources and tooling; suitable globally across industries, with quick starts for SMEs via templates.
DORA Details
What It Is
Digital Operational Resilience Act (DORA), Regulation (EU) 2022/2554, is an EU-wide regulation for financial sector entities to build resilience against ICT disruptions like cyberattacks. It targets 20 financial entity types and critical third-party providers (CTPPs), using a risk-based, proportional approach.
Key Components
Core pillars include:
- **ICT Risk Management FrameworksRisk identification, mitigation, and annual reviews.
- **Incident Reporting4-hour initial notification for major incidents.
- **Resilience TestingAnnual basic tests, triennial threat-led penetration testing (TLPT).
- **Third-Party OversightVendor due diligence, monitoring, and ESAs supervision. No fixed controls; guided by RTS/ITS. Mandatory compliance enforced by authorities.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for EU compliance by January 2025, DORA mitigates cyber risks (74% see as top threat), enhances systemic resilience, fosters trust, and drives cybersecurity investments amid threats like CrowdStrike outage.
Implementation Overview
Conduct gap analyses, develop frameworks, implement testing/vendor programs. Applies to ~22,000 EU financial entities, scaled by size. Requires reporting, no formal certification but authority oversight.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIST CSF | DORA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management lifecycle | Digital operational resilience in finance |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, voluntary | EU financial entities and ICT providers |
| Nature | Voluntary risk-based framework | Mandatory EU regulation |
| Testing | Self-assessment via Profiles and Tiers | Annual basic tests, triennial TLPT |
| Penalties | No legal penalties | Up to 2% global annual turnover |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIST CSF and DORA
NIST CSF FAQ
DORA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria in Plain English: Side-by-Side Decoder for Security, Availability, and Beyond
Decode AICPA Trust Services Criteria from auditor jargon to plain English with side-by-side tables, analogies & TL;DRs. CISOs & founders: implement SOC 2 contro

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch
Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach

Top 10 Reasons ISO 27701 is the Ultimate Privacy Boost for Your ISO 27001 ISMS in 2025
Extend ISO 27001 with ISO 27701 for ultimate privacy governance amid GDPR & AI regs. Discover top 10 advantages like integrated audits to future-proof your ISMS
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
PRINCE2 vs ISO 31000
Compare PRINCE2 vs ISO 31000: Structured project governance meets dynamic risk framework. Uncover principles, processes & tailoring for better decisions. Choose wisely now.
CCPA vs EU AI Act
Discover CCPA vs EU AI Act: Compare US privacy rights with EU AI risk rules. Master compliance strategies, fines, pitfalls & implementation for global success now.
ISO 27032 vs SOC 2
Discover ISO 27032 vs SOC 2: Global Internet cybersecurity guidelines vs AICPA TSC for SaaS trust. Compare scopes, audits, implementation & choose your compliance edge now.