NIST CSF
Voluntary framework for managing cybersecurity risks organization-wide
ISO 37001
International standard for anti-bribery management systems.
Quick Verdict
NIST CSF provides voluntary cybersecurity risk management for all organizations, while ISO 37001 is a certifiable standard for anti-bribery systems. Companies adopt NIST CSF for flexible cyber posture improvement and ISO 37001 for demonstrable compliance and legal mitigation.
NIST CSF
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Key Features
- Introduces Govern function as central governance pillar in CSF 2.0
- Defines six core Functions for full cybersecurity lifecycle
- Uses Profiles for Current vs Target gap analysis
- Provides four Tiers to assess risk management maturity
- Maps subcategories to ISO 27001, NIST 800-53 standards
ISO 37001
ISO 37001: Anti-Bribery Management Systems
Key Features
- Risk-based bribery risk assessment and due diligence
- Third-party management and controls requirements
- Leadership commitment and anti-bribery policy
- Financial and non-financial bribery controls
- PDCA cycle for continual improvement and audits
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIST CSF Details
What It Is
NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based guideline developed by NIST for managing cybersecurity risks. It provides a flexible structure applicable to organizations of any size or sector, emphasizing outcomes over prescriptive controls through its Framework Core, Tiers, and Profiles.
Key Components
- **Six Core FunctionsGovern (new in 2.0), Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover—organized into 22 Categories and 112 Subcategories.
- **Implementation TiersFour levels (Partial to Adaptive) for assessing risk management sophistication.
- **ProfilesAlign Core outcomes with business needs via Current and Target states.
- No formal certification; self-attestation and mappings to standards like ISO 27001, NIST SP 800-53.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances risk prioritization, stakeholder communication, supply chain management, and compliance demonstration. Builds board-level trust, reduces incidents via governance focus, and supports insurance discounts.
Implementation Overview
Start with Quick Start Guides for Profiles and gap analysis. Applies universally; involves asset inventory, policy development, monitoring. Tooling like GRC platforms accelerates; timelines vary by Tier, often 6-12 months for maturity.
ISO 37001 Details
What It Is
ISO 37001 is the international standard for establishing, implementing, and maintaining an Anti-Bribery Management System (ABMS). It provides certifiable requirements to prevent, detect, and respond to bribery risks. The risk-based approach follows the ISO Harmonized Structure (HS) and PDCA cycle, covering bribery by or against organizations, including indirect acts via third parties.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
- Core controls: policy, risk assessment, due diligence, training, financial/non-financial controls, reporting.
- Built on proportionality to organization size/sector; optional third-party certification with audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates legal risks (e.g., FCPA, UK Bribery Act) via evidentiary due diligence.
- Enhances reputation, stakeholder trust, ESG alignment.
- Drives efficiencies (up to 15% compliance cost reduction), operational controls.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, risk assessment, controls, training, audits.
- Applicable to all sizes/sectors globally; 6-12 months typical for midsize firms.
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIST CSF | ISO 37001 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management lifecycle | Anti-bribery prevention and detection |
| Industry | All sectors, global applicability | All sectors, global anti-corruption focus |
| Nature | Voluntary framework, no certification | Certifiable management system standard |
| Testing | Self-assessment via Profiles and Tiers | Third-party certification audits required |
| Penalties | No formal penalties, voluntary adoption | No penalties, certification can be lost |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIST CSF and ISO 37001
NIST CSF FAQ
ISO 37001 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig
Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
TOGAF vs EMAS
Compare TOGAF vs EMAS: IT architecture framework meets EU eco-management gold standard. Discover key differences, benefits for strategy & sustainability—find your best fit now!
RoHS vs COBIT
Discover RoHS vs COBIT: Contrast EU's hazardous substances directive for EEE compliance with ISACA's IT governance framework. Unlock strategies for risk management, exemptions & audits. Compare now!
PMBOK vs ISO 22301
PMBOK vs ISO 22301: Project mgmt gold standard for delivery vs BCMS resilience framework. Tailor standards, cut risks, ensure continuity—compare now!