NIST CSF
Voluntary risk-based framework for cybersecurity risk management
LGPD
Brazil's regulation for personal data protection
Quick Verdict
NIST CSF offers voluntary cybersecurity risk management for global organizations, while LGPD mandates personal data protection for Brazil-targeted entities with strict fines. Companies adopt CSF for strategic posture improvement; LGPD for legal compliance and market access.
NIST CSF
NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0
Key Features
- Introduces Govern function for overarching cybersecurity governance
- Defines six core Functions for complete risk lifecycle
- Provides four Implementation Tiers for maturity assessment
- Enables Current/Target Profiles for gap analysis roadmaps
- Offers mappings to standards like ISO 27001, NIST 800-53
LGPD
Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais (Law 13.709/2018)
Key Features
- Extraterritorial scope for Brazilian residents' data processing
- 10 core principles including prevention and non-discrimination
- Mandatory DPO appointment and public disclosure for controllers
- 3-business-day breach notifications to ANPD and subjects
- Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue with graduated sanctions
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
NIST CSF Details
What It Is
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 is a voluntary, risk-based guideline developed by the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology. It provides organizations worldwide with a flexible structure to manage cybersecurity risks, evolving from critical infrastructure focus to universal applicability. Its risk-based approach emphasizes outcomes over prescriptive controls, using a common language for strategic risk discussions.
Key Components
- **Framework CoreSix Functions (Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover), organized into 22 Categories and 112 Subcategories with informative references.
- **Implementation TiersFour levels (Partial to Adaptive) for evaluating risk management sophistication.
- **Framework ProfilesCurrent and Target states for alignment and gap analysis. No formal certification; self-attestation and mappings to standards like ISO 27001 and NIST SP 800-53.
Why Organizations Use It
Enhances risk prioritization, board communication, supply chain oversight, and compliance demonstration. Reduces threats cost-effectively, builds stakeholder trust, and supports insurance discounts. Ideal for demonstrating due care amid evolving threats.
Implementation Overview
Start with Current Profile assessment, prioritize gaps via Tiers, implement via Functions. Suited for all sizes/sectors; tooling accelerates for SMEs. Involves policy development, training, monitoring; ongoing via Profiles. (178 words)
LGPD Details
What It Is
LGPD (Lei Geral de Proteção de Dados Pessoais, Law No. 13.709/2018) is Brazil's comprehensive data protection regulation, enacted in 2018 and fully enforced since 2021. It protects personal data of identified or identifiable natural persons with extraterritorial scope for processing targeting Brazilian residents. Employs a risk-based approach with 10 core principles like purpose limitation, necessity, and accountability.
Key Components
- **10 principlesPurpose limitation, adequacy, necessity, transparency, security, prevention, non-discrimination, accountability.
- **Data subject rightsAccess, correction, deletion, portability, anonymization, objection to automated decisions.
- **10 legal basesConsent, contracts, legitimate interests, sensitive data restrictions.
- **GovernanceMandatory DPO for controllers, processing records, DPIAs for high-risk, enforced by ANPD with graduated sanctions up to 2% Brazilian revenue (R$50M cap).
Why Organizations Use It
- Avoids fines, suspensions, reputational damage.
- Builds trust, enables market access in Brazil's digital economy.
- Manages breach/cross-border risks via SCCs.
- Drives efficiency, innovation through minimization, privacy-by-design.
Implementation Overview
Phased: governance/DPO appointment, data mapping/RoPA, policies/DSRs, technical controls/training, monitoring/audits. Applies universally to public/private entities processing Brazilian data, no size exemptions. ANPD audits, no formal certification. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | NIST CSF | LGPD |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Cybersecurity risk management lifecycle | Personal data protection and processing |
| Industry | All sectors worldwide, any size | All sectors targeting Brazilian residents |
| Nature | Voluntary risk management framework | Mandatory data protection regulation |
| Testing | Self-assessment via Profiles and Tiers | DPIAs for high-risk processing, ANPD audits |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, self-attestation | Fines up to 2% Brazilian revenue, R$50M cap |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about NIST CSF and LGPD
NIST CSF FAQ
LGPD FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SOC 2 Audit Survival Guide: Auditor Questions, Red Flags, and Evidence Prep for First-Time Pass
Ace your SOC 2 audit with predicted auditor questions, model answers, red flags, and evidence checklists from CPA best practices & SignWell's journey. Reduce st

Top 5 Reasons TISAX Tabletop Exercises Prevent €10M+ Supply Chain Breaches for ADAS Tier 1 Suppliers in 2025
Unlock top 5 reasons TISAX tabletop exercises deliver 4:1 ROI preventing €10M+ supply chain breaches for ADAS Tier 1 suppliers. ENX case studies & VDA ISA contr

The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews
Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 13485 vs NERC CIP
Compare ISO 13485 vs NERC CIP: Medical QMS rigor meets grid cyber standards. Uncover differences, overlaps, compliance tips for regulated ops. Boost your strategy now!
ITIL vs WEEE
ITIL vs WEEE: Compare ITIL's ITSM best practices with WEEE Directive for e-waste compliance. Align IT services & asset mgmt for efficiency, sustainability. Optimize now!
ISO 22301 vs ITIL
Explore ISO 22301 vs ITIL: BCM resilience (PDCA, BIA) vs ITSM agility (SVS, 34 practices). Integrate for unbreakable ops—compare now! (140)