Standards Comparison

    AS9100

    Mandatory
    2016

    International standard for aerospace quality management systems

    VS

    23 NYCRR 500

    Mandatory
    2017

    NY regulation for financial services cybersecurity compliance

    Quick Verdict

    AS9100 delivers aerospace quality management certification for aviation suppliers worldwide, emphasizing risk, configuration, and safety. 23 NYCRR 500 mandates cybersecurity for NY financial entities, requiring CISO oversight, MFA, and 72-hour incident reporting to protect NPI.

    Quality Management

    AS9100

    AS9100D: Aerospace Quality Management Systems Requirements

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Aerospace-specific risk management across product lifecycle
    • Mandatory configuration management and traceability controls
    • Explicit product safety and counterfeit prevention requirements
    • Enhanced supplier approval, monitoring, and auditing
    • Human factors integration in operations and competence
    Financial Services

    23 NYCRR 500

    23 NYCRR Part 500 Cybersecurity Regulation

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Annual CEO/CISO dual-signature compliance certification
    • Phishing-resistant MFA for privileged and remote access
    • 72-hour notification for material cybersecurity incidents
    • Risk-based third-party service provider security policy
    • Annual penetration testing and vulnerability assessments

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    AS9100 Details

    What It Is

    AS9100D is the internationally recognized Aerospace Quality Management System (QMS) standard, building on ISO 9001:2015 with over 100 sector-specific requirements for aviation, space, and defense organizations. Its primary purpose is ensuring safe, reliable product realization through design, production, and servicing. It employs a risk-based, process-oriented approach emphasizing lifecycle controls.

    Key Components

    • Core domains: risk management, configuration management, product safety, counterfeit prevention, supplier controls.
    • Follows 10-clause structure with aerospace augmentations in operational planning.
    • Built on PDCA cycle for continual improvement.
    • Requires third-party certification via accredited registrars with surveillance audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Provides market access to OEMs, reduces defects by 15-40%, enhances supply-chain resilience. Contractually mandated by primes like Boeing; mitigates liability and audit risks. Builds stakeholder trust through certified reliability.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased roadmap: leadership commitment, gap analysis, process redesign, internal audits, certification. Applies to OEMs, suppliers, MROs globally; 6-18 months typical, involving training, QMS software, supplier integration.

    23 NYCRR 500 Details

    What It Is

    23 NYCRR Part 500 is the New York Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) Cybersecurity Regulation, a state-level mandate for financial services entities. It establishes risk-based minimum cybersecurity standards to protect nonpublic information (NPI) and ensure operational integrity, applying to Covered Entities like banks, insurers, and licensees operating in New York.

    Key Components

    • 14 core requirements including Cybersecurity Program, CISO appointment, MFA, encryption, penetration testing, TPSP oversight, and 72-hour incident reporting.
    • Risk Assessment as foundational, with annual CEO/CISO certification and five-year record retention.
    • Built on NIST CSF or equivalent; Class A Companies (high revenue/employees) face enhanced audits and controls.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for NY-regulated financial firms to avoid multimillion-dollar fines (e.g., Robinhood $30M).
    • Enhances resilience, vendor management, and executive accountability.
    • Builds trust, reduces incident risk, and aligns with insurance/underwriting needs.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased roadmap: governance first, then MFA/asset inventory, testing/IR.
    • Applies to NY-licensed entities regardless of size/location; small exemptions limited.
    • No universal certification, but annual filing and NYDFS examinations required. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    AS9100
    Aerospace QMS with safety, configuration, risk controls
    23 NYCRR 500
    Financial services cybersecurity program and NPI protection

    Industry

    AS9100
    Aerospace, aviation, space, defense globally
    23 NYCRR 500
    NY-licensed banks, insurers, financial entities

    Nature

    AS9100
    Voluntary certification standard building on ISO 9001
    23 NYCRR 500
    Mandatory NY regulation with enforcement and fines

    Testing

    AS9100
    Internal audits, management reviews, surveillance audits
    23 NYCRR 500
    Annual pen testing, vulnerability scans, continuous monitoring

    Penalties

    AS9100
    Certification loss, contract disqualification, no fines
    23 NYCRR 500
    Multi-million fines, consent orders, license actions

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about AS9100 and 23 NYCRR 500

    AS9100 FAQ

    23 NYCRR 500 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages