OSHA
US federal regulation assuring safe workplace conditions
ISO 22000
International standard for food safety management systems.
Quick Verdict
OSHA mandates US workplace safety through enforced standards and penalties, while ISO 22000 provides voluntary global food safety certification via HACCP and PRPs. Companies adopt OSHA for legal compliance; ISO 22000 for market access and supply chain trust.
OSHA
Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970
Key Features
- Mandates General Duty Clause for recognized hazards
- Enforces hierarchy of controls prioritizing engineering solutions
- Codified standards in 29 CFR 1910 for general industry
- Risk-based inspection prioritization for high hazards
- Requires electronic injury and illness data submission
ISO 22000
ISO 22000:2018 Food safety management systems
Key Features
- High-Level Structure (HLS) for integrated management systems
- Dual PDCA cycles for strategic and operational control
- HACCP-based hazard analysis with PRPs, OPRPs, CCPs
- Risk-based thinking for organizational risks and hazards
- Interactive communication across the food chain
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
OSHA Details
What It Is
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards, established by the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, are U.S. federal regulations enforcing workplace safety. Primary purpose: assure safe, healthful conditions via standards in 29 CFR 1910 (general industry). Key approach: General Duty Clause for recognized hazards, supplemented by specific rules and hierarchy of controls.
Key Components
- Subparts A-Z covering walking surfaces, PPE, hazardous materials, toxic substances.
- Over 1,000 standards with PELs, training, recordkeeping.
- Core principles: performance-based compliance, employer/employee duties.
- Enforcement via citations, penalties up to $165,514.
Why Organizations Use It
- Legal mandate reducing injury risks, penalties.
- Lowers workers' comp, boosts productivity, retention.
- Enhances reputation, meets ESG, supply-chain demands.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, written programs (IIPP, HazCom), training, audits.
- Applies to most U.S. private employers; state plans vary.
- No certification; compliance via inspections, electronic reporting.
ISO 22000 Details
What It Is
ISO 22000:2018 is the international standard specifying requirements for a Food Safety Management System (FSMS). It provides a framework for organizations in the food chain to ensure safe products through hazard prevention and compliance with regulations. The risk-based approach integrates HACCP principles with management system discipline using the High-Level Structure (HLS) and dual PDCA cycles.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 covering context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, and improvement.
- Core elements: PRPs, hazard analysis, CCPs/OPRPs, traceability, communication, verification.
- Built on Codex HACCP and HLS for integration.
- Voluntary certification by accredited bodies.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets customer, regulatory, and statutory requirements.
- Reduces risks of recalls, contamination, and liability.
- Enhances market access, supplier qualification, and GFSI alignment.
- Builds trust with stakeholders via auditable assurance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, PRPs, hazard control plan, training, audits.
- Applies to all food chain organizations globally.
- Certification via stage 1/2 audits, surveillance, recertification every 3 years. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | OSHA | ISO 22000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Workplace safety, health hazards, recordkeeping | Food safety management, HACCP, PRPs |
| Industry | All US industries, general/construction/agriculture | Global food chain organizations |
| Nature | Mandatory US federal regulations, enforced | Voluntary international certification standard |
| Testing | Inspections, injury logs, electronic reporting | Internal audits, management reviews, certification |
| Penalties | Civil fines up to $165k, failure-to-abate daily | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about OSHA and ISO 22000
OSHA FAQ
ISO 22000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Measuring NIST CSF 2.0 Success: KPIs, Dashboards, and Continuous Improvement Using Tiers & Profiles
Transform NIST CSF 2.0 into quantifiable success: Define board-ready KPIs for Functions, build Profile dashboards, track Tier progression. Prove ROI amid cyber
NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch
Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach
NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions
Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
NIST 800-171 vs REACH
Explore NIST 800-171 vs REACH: Key differences in cybersecurity for CUI protection & EU chemical regs. Gain insights to streamline dual compliance & safeguard ops. Dive in!
NIST CSF vs DORA
Compare NIST CSF vs DORA: Flexible US cyber framework meets EU financial resilience mandate. Key diffs, benefits & implementation tips for compliance success!
ITIL vs APRA CPS 234
Compare ITIL vs APRA CPS 234: Align ITSM best practices with cyber resilience mandates for finance. Governance, controls & testing insights. Boost compliance now!