Standards Comparison

    OSHA

    Mandatory
    1970

    US federal regulation for workplace safety standards

    VS

    NIST 800-53

    Mandatory
    2020

    U.S. federal catalog of security and privacy controls

    Quick Verdict

    OSHA mandates workplace safety standards with inspections and fines for US employers, while NIST 800-53 provides a flexible control catalog for federal cybersecurity and privacy risks. Companies adopt OSHA for legal compliance, NIST for robust system protection and contracts.

    Occupational Safety

    OSHA

    Occupational Safety and Health Standards (29 CFR 1910)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Enforces workplace safety via 29 CFR 1910 standards
    • General Duty Clause addresses recognized serious hazards
    • Hierarchy of controls prioritizes engineering over PPE
    • Mandatory injury/illness recordkeeping and electronic reporting
    • Risk-based inspections with escalating civil penalties
    Security Controls

    NIST 800-53

    NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 Security and Privacy Controls

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • 20 control families with 1,100+ security/privacy controls
    • Risk-based baselines for low/moderate/high impact systems
    • Outcome-based statements enabling flexible tailoring/overlays
    • Dedicated supply chain (SR) and privacy (PT) families
    • OSCAL machine-readable formats for automation

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    OSHA Details

    What It Is

    Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards, codified in 29 CFR 1910 for general industry, are U.S. federal regulations under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970. They establish enforceable rules to assure safe, healthful workplaces by addressing hazards through specific standards and the General Duty Clause. The risk-based approach prioritizes hazard prevention via hierarchy of controls.

    Key Components

    • Organized into subparts (A-Z) covering walking-working surfaces, PPE, hazardous materials, toxic substances, emergency plans.
    • Core principles: hierarchy of controls, exposure monitoring, medical surveillance, training.
    • No certification; compliance enforced via inspections, citations, penalties up to $165,514 for willful violations.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for most U.S. private employers to avoid fines, shutdowns, litigation.
    • Reduces injuries, lowers insurance costs, boosts productivity.
    • Builds worker trust, meets stakeholder ESG expectations, enables market access.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, written programs (e.g., IIPP, HazCom), training, recordkeeping (OSHA 300 logs), audits.
    • Applies to general industry; scalable by size; state plans may add stringency.
    • Ongoing via inspections, electronic ITA submissions.

    NIST 800-53 Details

    What It Is

    NIST SP 800-53 Revision 5 is the U.S. federal government's primary catalog of security and privacy controls for information systems and organizations. This framework provides standardized safeguards to protect confidentiality, integrity, availability, and privacy risks. It employs a risk-based, outcome-oriented approach integrated with the Risk Management Framework (RMF).

    Key Components

    • Organized into 20 control families (e.g., AC, AU, SR) with over 1,100 base controls and enhancements.
    • Baselines in SP 800-53B for Low, Moderate, High impact levels per FIPS 199, plus a privacy baseline.
    • Built on functionality and assurance principles; supports tailoring, overlays, and OSCAL machine-readable formats.
    • Compliance via RMF: select, implement, assess (SP 800-53A), authorize, monitor.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for federal agencies/contractors under FISMA/OMB A-130; voluntary for others.
    • Enhances risk management, operational resilience, supply chain security.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, enables FedRAMP, reciprocity; maps to ISO 27001, CSF.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased RMF process: categorize, select/tailor baselines, implement, assess, monitor.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries processing federal data; requires documentation, automation, audits. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    OSHA
    Physical workplace safety, health hazards, emergency prep
    NIST 800-53
    Information systems security, privacy controls, cyber risks

    Industry

    OSHA
    All US industries, general/construction/agriculture
    NIST 800-53
    Federal agencies, contractors, any processing federal data

    Nature

    OSHA
    Mandatory federal regulation with inspections
    NIST 800-53
    Control catalog/framework for risk management

    Testing

    OSHA
    OSHA inspections, recordkeeping audits
    NIST 800-53
    RMF assessments, continuous monitoring via 800-53A

    Penalties

    OSHA
    Civil fines up to $165K per willful violation
    NIST 800-53
    No direct penalties, contract loss or FISMA findings

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about OSHA and NIST 800-53

    OSHA FAQ

    NIST 800-53 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages