What is the primary objective of **OSHA**?

**The primary objective of OSHA is to assure safe and healthful working conditions for every working man and woman in the nation, as stated in Section 2 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970.** This mission is achieved through developing and enforcing standards under 29 CFR Parts 1910 (general industry), 1926 (construction), 1928 (agriculture), and 1915–1919 (maritime), alongside research via NIOSH and the General Duty Clause in Section 5(a)(1), which requires workplaces free from recognized hazards likely to cause death or serious physical harm.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **OSHA**?

**All private-sector employers engaged in businesses affecting interstate commerce must comply with OSHA, excluding self-employed individuals, immediate family farms, and workplaces under other federal statutes like mining.** Coverage includes employers with more than 10 employees for recordkeeping under 29 CFR 1904, with electronic submission required for those with 250+ employees or 20–249 in high-hazard NAICS codes. In 22 states with OSHA-approved plans, state rules apply and must be at least as effective as federal standards; host employers bear primary responsibility for temporary workers' safety.

Does **OSHA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**OSHA does not require external audits or third-party certification for compliance.** Enforcement occurs through OSHA inspections prioritized by imminent dangers, fatalities, severe injuries (reportable within 8 or 24 hours per 1904.39), complaints, and high-hazard targeting. Employers maintain self-audits via Injury and Illness Prevention Programs, with voluntary options like Voluntary Protection Programs (VPP) offering recognition for superior performance but no mandatory certification.

How often should an assessment for **OSHA** be performed?

**OSHA requires periodic hazard assessments tailored to specific standards, such as annual inspections for Lockout/Tagout (1910.147(c)(6)) and noise monitoring when exposures approach 85 dBA (1910.95).** General assessments align with recommended Injury and Illness Prevention Programs, including routine Job Hazard Analyses, quarterly internal audits, and post-incident reviews. Form 300A summaries are posted annually from February 1–April 30, with electronic submissions due March 2.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **OSHA**?

**Non-compliance with OSHA results in civil penalties up to $16,550 per serious/other-than-serious violation and $165,514 per willful/repeated violation as of January 15, 2025, adjusted annually for inflation.** Failure-to-abate incurs $16,550 per day; inspections can lead to citations within six months, work stoppages for imminent dangers, and criminal penalties for willful violations causing death. Public data from Injury Tracking Application submissions heightens reputational risk.

An **OSHA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**OSHA is not designed for direct mapping to other international frameworks and stands alone as U.S. federal law under the OSH Act.** Its standards (e.g., 29 CFR 1910 hierarchy of controls) may align conceptually with voluntary guidelines like ANSI Z10, but no formal equivalency exists; state plans like Cal/OSHA provide more stringent PELs as benchmarks.

What is the first step to begin implementing **OSHA**?

**The first step to implement OSHA is to develop a written safety policy signed by top management, committing resources and defining program goals per OSHA's recommended Safety and Health Program Guidelines.** Conduct a hazard identification inventory using Job Hazard Analyses for high-risk tasks, mapping operations to applicable 29 CFR parts (e.g., 1910, 1926), and establish leadership accountability.

What is the primary objective of **SOC 2**?

**The primary objective of SOC 2 is to provide independent assurance that a service organization's controls meet the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) for security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy.** Developed by the AICPA, SOC 2 evaluates systems handling customer data, with **Security (CC1-CC9)** mandatory. Type 2 reports assess design and operating effectiveness over 3-12 months, targeting SaaS, cloud, and tech service organizations.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SOC 2**?

**No organization is legally required to comply with SOC 2, as it is a voluntary AICPA framework driven by market demands from enterprise clients.** It professionally targets **service organizations** like SaaS providers, cloud platforms, fintech, and data processors storing, transmitting, or processing customer data. Enterprises mandate Type 2 reports in RFPs and MSAs for vendor risk assessments, especially for deals exceeding $5K ACV.

Does **SOC 2** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SOC 2 requires an external audit by an independent, AICPA-accredited CPA firm to issue Type 1 or Type 2 attestation reports.** Type 1 verifies control design at a point in time; Type 2 tests operating effectiveness over a minimum 3-month period via sampling, walkthroughs, and evidence review (e.g., logs, pen tests). No formal "certification" exists—reports provide the assurance.

How often should an assessment for **SOC 2** be performed?

**SOC 2 Type 2 assessments should be performed annually to capture a full control cycle, with bridge letters extending validity up to 3 months.** The audit covers a 3-12 month monitoring period, followed by recertification. Continuous monitoring (e.g., quarterly access reviews, vulnerability scans) sustains compliance between audits.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SOC 2**?

**Non-compliance with SOC 2 results in lost business opportunities, as 70-80% of enterprise SaaS deals require Type 2 reports, extending sales cycles by 3-6 months and inflating CAC by 20-50%.** No AICPA fines apply, but it triggers deal disqualification, heightened contractual liabilities, reputational damage, and breach-related costs exceeding $1M per incident under laws like CCPA.

An **SOC 2** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SOC 2 maps effectively to frameworks like ISO 27001 (80% control overlap), NIST CSF, and others via AICPA spreadsheets.** Common Criteria (CC1-CC9) align with ISO Annex A controls, enabling reuse for multi-compliance without dual audits. This supports global SaaS expansion, such as GDPR paths.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SOC 2**?

**The first step to implement SOC 2 is a scoping exercise and gap analysis against the Trust Services Criteria, engaging a CPA auditor for readiness assessment.** Define in-scope systems, data flows, and TSC (Security mandatory), inventory assets, and map ~50-100 controls. Tools like Vanta automate this, costing $5-10K initially.

OSHA vs SOC 2 | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

OSHA

Mandatory

1970

U.S. federal regulation assuring workplace safety standards

SOC 2

Voluntary

2010

AICPA framework for service organization security controls

Quick Verdict

OSHA mandates workplace safety via regulations and inspections for all US employers, while SOC 2 is a voluntary audit proving data security controls for service organizations. Companies adopt OSHA to avoid fines; SOC 2 to win enterprise trust and deals.

Occupational Safety

OSHA

Occupational Safety and Health Standards (29 CFR 1910)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

General Duty Clause enforces recognized serious hazards
Hierarchy of controls prioritizes engineering over PPE
29 CFR 1910 standards cover general industry hazards
Mandatory OSHA 300/300A/301 injury recordkeeping
Risk-based inspections with escalating civil penalties

Cybersecurity / Trust

SOC 2

System and Organization Controls 2

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Trust Services Criteria with mandatory Security
Type 2 operational effectiveness over 3-12 months
Customizable scoping of optional criteria
Independent CPA firm audit attestation
Overlaps with ISO 27001 and GDPR

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

OSHA Details

What It Is

OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration) enforces the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, a U.S. federal regulation framework. Its primary purpose is assuring safe, healthful working conditions via standards in 29 CFR 1910 for general industry. It uses a risk-based approach with the General Duty Clause for uncodified hazards and hierarchy of controls.

Key Components

Subparts A-Z covering walking surfaces, PPE, hazardous materials, toxic substances.
Core principles: elimination, engineering controls, administrative controls, PPE.
Recordkeeping (OSHA Forms 300/300A/301), inspections, penalties up to $165k.
Compliance via enforcement, not certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal mandate reduces injury risks, penalties, litigation.
Lowers workers' comp, boosts productivity, enhances reputation.
Builds stakeholder trust through transparent data.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, written programs (IIPP, HazCom), training, audits.
Applies to most U.S. private employers; state plans vary.
Ongoing inspections, electronic reporting required.

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

SOC 2 (System and Organization Controls 2) is a voluntary audit framework developed by the American Institute of CPAs (AICPA). It evaluates service organizations' commitments to security, availability, processing integrity, confidentiality, and privacy using the Trust Services Criteria (TSC). The approach is control-based and risk-oriented, focusing on design and operational effectiveness.

Key Components

**Five TSCSecurity (mandatory, CC1-CC9), plus optional Availability (A1), Confidentiality (C1), Processing Integrity (PI1), Privacy (P1-P11)
50-100 controls per scope, with redundancy (2-3 per category)
Built on COSO principles
Type 1 (point-in-time design) and Type 2 (operating effectiveness over 3-12 months) reports by CPA auditors

Why Organizations Use It

Mainly SaaS/cloud providers adopt SOC 2 to meet enterprise demands, accelerate sales (shortens cycles 15-30%), reduce breach risks, and build trust. It provides competitive edges like market access and overlaps with ISO 27001/GDPR, without legal mandates.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis (2-4 weeks), control deployment (4-8 weeks), monitoring (3-6 months), CPA audit (1-2 months). Suits all sizes in tech/fintech; annual Type 2 recertification required. (178 words)

Key Differences

Aspect	OSHA	SOC 2
Scope	Workplace safety, health hazards, recordkeeping	Data security, availability, privacy controls
Industry	All US industries, general/construction/agriculture	Service orgs (SaaS, cloud, fintech) US-focused
Nature	Mandatory federal regulation with inspections	Voluntary AICPA attestation/audit framework
Testing	OSHA inspections, employer recordkeeping audits	CPA Type 1/2 audits over 3-12 months
Penalties	Civil fines up to $165K, criminal for willful	No penalties, loss of customer trust/deals

Scope

OSHA

Workplace safety, health hazards, recordkeeping

SOC 2

Data security, availability, privacy controls

Industry

OSHA

All US industries, general/construction/agriculture

SOC 2

Service orgs (SaaS, cloud, fintech) US-focused

Nature

OSHA

Mandatory federal regulation with inspections

SOC 2

Voluntary AICPA attestation/audit framework

Testing

OSHA

OSHA inspections, employer recordkeeping audits

SOC 2

CPA Type 1/2 audits over 3-12 months

Penalties

OSHA

Civil fines up to $165K, criminal for willful

SOC 2

No penalties, loss of customer trust/deals

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about OSHA and SOC 2

OSHA FAQ

SOC 2 FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow

Master SEC Form 8-K Item 1.05 compliance with step-by-step materiality assessment, incident workflows & Inline XBRL tagging. Beat the 4-business-day clock. Esse

NIST CSF 2.0 Supply Chain Risk Management: Complete Playbook with Profiles, Tiers, and Vendor Assessment Templates

Master NIST CSF 2.0 ID.SC supply chain risk management with vendor assessment templates, profile gap analysis, and tier strategies. Mitigate third-party threats

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

TOGAF vs ISO 26000

Compare TOGAF vs ISO 26000: EA framework for IT alignment meets SR guidance for ethical ops. Unlock governance, sustainability & strategy synergies. Explore now!

GDPR vs GRI

Compare GDPR vs GRI: EU data privacy law meets global sustainability standards. Discover key differences, compliance strategies, and impacts on business—expert insights await!

BREEAM vs ISO 27701

Explore BREEAM vs ISO 27701: BREEAM excels in sustainable building certs (energy, health, ecology); ISO 27701 masters privacy mgmt for PII compliance. Compare benefits—boost ESG & data security now!

OSHA

SOC 2

Quick Verdict

OSHA

Key Features

SOC 2

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

OSHA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SOC 2 Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

OSHA FAQ

What is the primary objective of OSHA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with OSHA?

Does OSHA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for OSHA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with OSHA?

An OSHA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing OSHA?

SOC 2 FAQ

What is the primary objective of SOC 2?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SOC 2?

Does SOC 2 require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SOC 2 be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SOC 2?

An SOC 2 be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SOC 2?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

SEC Cybersecurity Rules Implementation Guide: Mastering Form 8-K Item 1.05 Materiality Determination and 4-Business-Day Reporting Workflow

NIST CSF 2.0 Supply Chain Risk Management: Complete Playbook with Profiles, Tiers, and Vendor Assessment Templates

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

TOGAF vs ISO 26000

GDPR vs GRI

BREEAM vs ISO 27701