PCI DSS
Global standard for securing payment cardholder data
COBIT
Framework for enterprise IT governance and management
Quick Verdict
PCI DSS mandates cardholder data security via 12 requirements for payment entities, enforced contractually with fines. COBIT provides voluntary IT governance framework across 40 objectives for enterprises. Companies adopt PCI DSS for compliance survival; COBIT for strategic IT alignment.
PCI DSS
Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS)
Key Features
- 12 requirements across 6 control objectives for CHD protection
- Over 300 granular sub-requirements with testing procedures
- Contractual enforcement via card brands and acquirers
- Network segmentation for scope minimization
- v4.0 customized or defined implementation approaches
COBIT
COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives
Key Features
- 40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
- 11 design factors for tailored governance systems
- CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance
- Goals cascade aligning stakeholder needs to IT
- Separation of governance from management responsibilities
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
PCI DSS Details
What It Is
PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is a contractual industry framework with 12 requirements in 6 control objectives. It mandates protection of cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD) for entities storing, processing, or transmitting it, using a control-based, prescriptive approach.
Key Components
- 12 requirements spanning network security, data protection, vulnerability management, access controls, monitoring/testing, and policies
- 300+ sub-requirements, testing procedures in v4.0
- Merchant levels 1-4, service provider levels 1-2 for validation (SAQ/ROC)
- Defined/customized implementation options
Why Organizations Use It
- Contractual obligation to avoid fines, bans by card brands/acquirers
- Minimizes breach costs ($37/record avg.), fraud risk
- Builds trust, enables card processing
- Enhances security via segmentation, MFA, encryption
Implementation Overview
- Scope CDE, gap analysis, remediate, validate (ASV scans, pen tests)
- Global applicability to merchants/service providers; QSA ROC for Level 1
- Ongoing assess-repair-report cycle (180 words)
COBIT Details
What It Is
COBIT 2019, or Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies, is a comprehensive IT governance and management framework developed by ISACA. Its primary purpose is to help organizations create value from IT, manage risk, and optimize resources by aligning stakeholder needs with actionable governance objectives through a tailored, design-factor-driven approach.
Key Components
- 40 governance and management objectives grouped into **five domainsEDM (governance), APO (planning), BAI (delivery), DSS (operations), MEA (monitoring).
- Six governance system principles and seven components (processes, structures, policies, information, culture, skills, infrastructure).
- 11 design factors for tailoring; CMMI-based performance management (levels 0-5); no formal certification, but capability assessments.
Why Organizations Use It
- Drives strategic alignment, risk optimization, and compliance (e.g., SOX, GDPR mappings).
- Enhances auditability, stakeholder trust, and digital transformation ROI.
- Provides competitive edge via measurable IT performance and interoperability with ISO 27001, ITIL, NIST.
Implementation Overview
- **Phased approachassess gaps, design via toolkit, pilot objectives, measure capabilities.
- Suited for medium-large enterprises across industries; requires training, change management; voluntary with internal/external audits.
Key Differences
| Aspect | PCI DSS | COBIT |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Payment card data security (12 requirements, 300+ controls) | Enterprise IT governance/management (40 objectives, 5 domains) |
| Industry | Payment processing merchants/service providers globally | All industries, enterprise-wide IT governance |
| Nature | Contractual security standard, enforced by card brands | Voluntary governance framework by ISACA |
| Testing | Quarterly ASV scans, annual ROC/SAQ by QSA | Capability assessments (0-5 levels), internal/external audits |
| Penalties | Fines, card processing bans, breach costs | No formal penalties, internal governance gaps |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about PCI DSS and COBIT
PCI DSS FAQ
COBIT FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
From Reactive Gatekeeper to Proactive Strategist: How Compliance Software Reshapes the Compliance Professional's Day
Discover how compliance software automates monitoring, delivers real-time insights, and transforms compliance pros from reactive gatekeepers to proactive strate
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
AEO vs IFS Food
Compare AEO vs IFS Food: Secure trade with AEO's customs perks or excel in food safety via IFS standards. Differences, benefits & strategies revealed. Optimize compliance now.
IEC 62443 vs ISO 50001
Discover IEC 62443 vs ISO 50001: IACS cybersecurity meets energy management mastery. Uncover differences, benefits & strategies for secure, efficient ops today.
Six Sigma vs HITRUST CSF
Compare Six Sigma vs HITRUST CSF: Data-driven quality methodology meets certifiable security framework for healthcare compliance. Optimize strategy & implementation. Discover now!