Standards Comparison

    Six Sigma

    Voluntary
    1986

    Data-driven framework for defect reduction and variation minimization

    VS

    HITRUST CSF

    Voluntary
    2022

    Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards

    Quick Verdict

    Six Sigma drives process excellence through DMAIC for all industries, while HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable security assurance harmonizing 60+ standards for regulated sectors like healthcare. Companies adopt Six Sigma for cost savings and quality; HITRUST for compliance trust and market access.

    Process Improvement

    Six Sigma

    ISO 13053:2011 Quantitative methods in Six Sigma

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • DMAIC structured methodology for process improvement
    • Data-driven statistical analysis and root cause verification
    • Belt hierarchy of professionalized practitioner roles
    • 3.4 DPMO benchmark with 1.5 sigma shift convention
    • Governance via Champions, tollgates, and control plans
    Information Security

    HITRUST CSF

    HITRUST Common Security Framework

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Harmonizes 60+ frameworks into single control library
    • Risk-based tailoring via organizational/system factors
    • Five-level maturity scoring model per control
    • Tiered certifications: e1, i1, r2 assurance levels
    • MyCSF platform for scoping, assessment, inheritance

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    Six Sigma Details

    What It Is

    Six Sigma is a de facto industry standard and formal guideline like ISO 13053:2011, a data-driven methodology for process improvement through defect prevention and variation reduction. It employs a structured DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) lifecycle for existing processes and DMADV for new designs, emphasizing statistical rigor and governance.

    Key Components

    • DMAIC/DMADV phases with mandatory deliverables like Project Charters, SIPOC maps, MSA, FMEA, and control plans.
    • Belt roles: Champions, Master Black Belts, Black/Green Belts.
    • Metrics: 3.4 DPMO, sigma levels, Cp/Cpk.
    • Certification via bodies like ASQ (experience, projects, exams); no single global authority.

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives financial savings (e.g., Motorola $17B, GE $1B+), customer satisfaction, and risk reduction. Voluntary adoption for competitive edge, integrates with Lean/ISO for compliance. Builds data-driven culture, stakeholder trust via proven ROI.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased rollout: executive sponsorship, training, project portfolio, DMAIC execution, sustainment via SPC/audits. Suits all sizes/industries; 4-6 months per project, enterprise-scale via belts and PMO. No mandatory certification, but ASQ recommended for credibility.

    HITRUST CSF Details

    What It Is

    HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework consolidating requirements from 60+ standards like HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It employs a risk-based, maturity-driven approach for security and privacy assurance.

    Key Components

    • 19 assessment domains and hierarchical structure (14 categories, ~49 objectives, ~156 specifications).
    • Five-level maturity model: Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed.
    • Tiered assessments: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, highest rigor).
    • MyCSF platform for scoping, evidence, and certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Rationalizes multi-regulatory compliance (assess once, report many).
    • Provides credible third-party assurance for healthcare, finance, and regulated sectors.
    • Reduces breach risk (99.4% certified environments breach-free), lowers insurance costs.
    • Enhances market access, TPRM efficiency, and competitive differentiation.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, readiness, remediation, validated assessment, continuous monitoring.
    • Involves policies, technical controls, evidence automation; suits mid-to-large orgs globally.
    • Requires Authorized External Assessors for certification (1-2 year validity).

    Key Differences

    Scope

    Six Sigma
    Process improvement, defect reduction, variation control
    HITRUST CSF
    Information security, privacy controls, compliance assurance

    Industry

    Six Sigma
    All industries, manufacturing to services globally
    HITRUST CSF
    Healthcare primary, regulated sectors, industry-agnostic

    Nature

    Six Sigma
    Voluntary methodology, no formal certification body
    HITRUST CSF
    Certifiable framework with centralized assurance program

    Testing

    Six Sigma
    Internal tollgates, project reviews, no external certification
    HITRUST CSF
    External assessor validation, maturity scoring, certification

    Penalties

    Six Sigma
    No legal penalties, program failure risks financial loss
    HITRUST CSF
    No legal penalties, loss of certification and market access

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about Six Sigma and HITRUST CSF

    Six Sigma FAQ

    HITRUST CSF FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages