Six Sigma
Data-driven framework for defect reduction and variation minimization
HITRUST CSF
Certifiable framework harmonizing 60+ security standards
Quick Verdict
Six Sigma drives process excellence through DMAIC for all industries, while HITRUST CSF delivers certifiable security assurance harmonizing 60+ standards for regulated sectors like healthcare. Companies adopt Six Sigma for cost savings and quality; HITRUST for compliance trust and market access.
Six Sigma
ISO 13053:2011 Quantitative methods in Six Sigma
Key Features
- DMAIC structured methodology for process improvement
- Data-driven statistical analysis and root cause verification
- Belt hierarchy of professionalized practitioner roles
- 3.4 DPMO benchmark with 1.5 sigma shift convention
- Governance via Champions, tollgates, and control plans
HITRUST CSF
HITRUST Common Security Framework
Key Features
- Harmonizes 60+ frameworks into single control library
- Risk-based tailoring via organizational/system factors
- Five-level maturity scoring model per control
- Tiered certifications: e1, i1, r2 assurance levels
- MyCSF platform for scoping, assessment, inheritance
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
Six Sigma Details
What It Is
Six Sigma is a de facto industry standard and formal guideline like ISO 13053:2011, a data-driven methodology for process improvement through defect prevention and variation reduction. It employs a structured DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) lifecycle for existing processes and DMADV for new designs, emphasizing statistical rigor and governance.
Key Components
- DMAIC/DMADV phases with mandatory deliverables like Project Charters, SIPOC maps, MSA, FMEA, and control plans.
- Belt roles: Champions, Master Black Belts, Black/Green Belts.
- Metrics: 3.4 DPMO, sigma levels, Cp/Cpk.
- Certification via bodies like ASQ (experience, projects, exams); no single global authority.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives financial savings (e.g., Motorola $17B, GE $1B+), customer satisfaction, and risk reduction. Voluntary adoption for competitive edge, integrates with Lean/ISO for compliance. Builds data-driven culture, stakeholder trust via proven ROI.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout: executive sponsorship, training, project portfolio, DMAIC execution, sustainment via SPC/audits. Suits all sizes/industries; 4-6 months per project, enterprise-scale via belts and PMO. No mandatory certification, but ASQ recommended for credibility.
HITRUST CSF Details
What It Is
HITRUST Common Security Framework (CSF) is a certifiable, threat-adaptive control framework consolidating requirements from 60+ standards like HIPAA, NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and GDPR. It employs a risk-based, maturity-driven approach for security and privacy assurance.
Key Components
- 19 assessment domains and hierarchical structure (14 categories, ~49 objectives, ~156 specifications).
- Five-level maturity model: Policy, Procedure, Implemented, Measured, Managed.
- Tiered assessments: e1 (44 controls), i1 (182 requirements), r2 (tailored, highest rigor).
- MyCSF platform for scoping, evidence, and certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Rationalizes multi-regulatory compliance (assess once, report many).
- Provides credible third-party assurance for healthcare, finance, and regulated sectors.
- Reduces breach risk (99.4% certified environments breach-free), lowers insurance costs.
- Enhances market access, TPRM efficiency, and competitive differentiation.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping, readiness, remediation, validated assessment, continuous monitoring.
- Involves policies, technical controls, evidence automation; suits mid-to-large orgs globally.
- Requires Authorized External Assessors for certification (1-2 year validity).
Key Differences
| Aspect | Six Sigma | HITRUST CSF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Process improvement, defect reduction, variation control | Information security, privacy controls, compliance assurance |
| Industry | All industries, manufacturing to services globally | Healthcare primary, regulated sectors, industry-agnostic |
| Nature | Voluntary methodology, no formal certification body | Certifiable framework with centralized assurance program |
| Testing | Internal tollgates, project reviews, no external certification | External assessor validation, maturity scoring, certification |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, program failure risks financial loss | No legal penalties, loss of certification and market access |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about Six Sigma and HITRUST CSF
Six Sigma FAQ
HITRUST CSF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.

What if the EU would not have made GDPR mandatory...
Explore a world without mandatory GDPR: How would organizations manage data? What data privacy regs would emerge? Uncover impacts on businesses and privacy laws

Image this: What if GDPR would have NOT been implemented by the EU
What if the EU never implemented GDPR? Explore this hypothetical: consumer data protection in Dec 2025, key differences, pros/cons for users & companies. Read t
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 37001 vs GRI
ISO 37001 vs GRI: Compare anti-bribery management systems with sustainability reporting standards. Uncover differences, benefits & integration for compliance & ESG excellence. Dive in!
BREEAM vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
Compare BREEAM vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023: Sustainability ratings meet AI governance. Unlock key diffs, credits, risks & compliance for exec decisions. Dive in!
CE Marking vs GDPR UK
Confused by CE Marking vs GDPR UK? Uncover key differences in product safety marking and data protection rules for seamless UK market compliance. Avoid fines—expert guide inside.