PCI DSS
Global standard protecting payment cardholder data security
ISO 31000
International guidelines for risk management frameworks
Quick Verdict
PCI DSS mandates granular security controls for payment card handlers via audits and scans, while ISO 31000 offers flexible risk management guidelines for any organization. Companies adopt PCI DSS for contractual compliance; ISO 31000 to enhance strategic decision-making.
PCI DSS
Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard
Key Features
- 12 requirements across 6 control objectives for card data
- 300+ granular sub-requirements and testing procedures
- Contractual mandate for merchants and service providers
- Quarterly ASV scans and annual penetration testing
- v4.0 emphasizes MFA, segmentation, and customized controls
ISO 31000
ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines
Key Features
- Eight core principles for effective risk management
- Framework emphasizing leadership and integration
- Iterative process for risk assessment and treatment
- Customizable to any organization or sector
- Dynamic monitoring with continual improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
PCI DSS Details
What It Is
PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is an industry framework of technical and operational requirements. It protects cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD) during storage, processing, and transmission. Managed by PCI Security Standards Council (PCI SSC) since 2006, it uses a control-based approach with 12 requirements under 6 objectives.
Key Components
- 12 core requirements spanning network security, data protection, vulnerability management, access controls, monitoring, and policies.
- Over 300 sub-requirements with testing procedures.
- Compliance via SAQ for smaller entities or ROC by QSAs; quarterly ASV scans and annual pentests required.
Why Organizations Use It
Contractually mandated for card-handling merchants/service providers to avoid fines, processing bans. Reduces breach risks/costs ($37/record avg.), builds trust, ensures GDPR alignment. Strategic for fraud reduction and market access.
Implementation Overview
Scoping CDE, gap analysis, remediation (segmentation, MFA, encryption), validation. Applies globally to all sizes handling cards; v4.0 (2024) adds customized approaches. Costs $5K-$200K+; 3-12 months typical.
ISO 31000 Details
What It Is
ISO 31000:2018, Risk management — Guidelines is an international standard offering non-certifiable guidance for systematic risk management. It defines risk as the effect of uncertainty on objectives and provides a principles-based approach applicable to any organization, emphasizing integration into governance, strategy, and operations for value creation and protection.
Key Components
- **Eight principlesintegrated, structured & comprehensive, customized, inclusive, dynamic, best available information, human/cultural factors, continual improvement.
- Framework (Clause 5): leadership commitment, integration, design, implementation, evaluation, improvement—mirroring PDCA cycle.
- Process (Clause 6): communication/consultation, scope/context/criteria, risk assessment (identify/analyze/evaluate), treatment, monitoring/review, recording/reporting. Guidelines only; no fixed controls or certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Improves decision-making, resilience, resource allocation; creates/protects value, builds stakeholder trust. Voluntary but supports regulatory compliance, enhances reputation, drives efficiency/competitiveness across sectors.
Implementation Overview
Phased: executive alignment, gap analysis, framework design, pilot process, enterprise rollout, ongoing monitoring. Suits all sizes/industries; internal audits for assurance, no external certification.
Key Differences
| Aspect | PCI DSS | ISO 31000 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Payment card data security controls | Enterprise-wide risk management guidelines |
| Industry | Payment processing, merchants, service providers | All industries, organizations worldwide |
| Nature | Contractual standard with audits | Voluntary non-certifiable guidelines |
| Testing | Quarterly scans, annual pentests, QSA audits | Internal reviews, monitoring, no formal certification |
| Penalties | Fines, processing bans, contractual enforcement | No penalties, internal governance only |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about PCI DSS and ISO 31000
PCI DSS FAQ
ISO 31000 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability
Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi
Beyond the Boardroom: 5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Elevates Every Department
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software boosts HR, IT, finance & more: automate risks, enhance efficiency, ensure data integrity, stay audit-ready. Elevate y
You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization
Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
RoHS vs Australian Privacy Act
Discover RoHS vs Australian Privacy Act: EU hazardous substance bans in electronics meet Australia's data privacy rules. Key differences, compliance tips. Master both now!
CMMC vs WEEE
Compare CMMC cybersecurity levels for DoD vs WEEE e-waste rules for EU producers. Unlock compliance strategies, pitfalls & implementation to win contracts & boost sustainability. Dive in now!
RoHS vs REACH
Compare RoHS vs REACH: RoHS limits 10 hazardous substances in EEE for safer recycling; REACH requires chemical registration, evaluation & restrictions. Master compliance now.