Standards Comparison

    PCI DSS

    Mandatory
    2022

    Industry standard for securing payment card data

    VS

    K-PIPA

    Mandatory
    2011

    South Korea's stringent regulation for personal data protection

    Quick Verdict

    PCI DSS secures payment card data via contractual controls for global merchants, while K-PIPA mandates comprehensive personal data protection for Korean residents with strict fines. Organizations adopt PCI DSS for payment compliance; K-PIPA to avoid legal penalties.

    Payment Security

    PCI DSS

    Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • 12 requirements organized into 6 control objectives
    • Over 300 granular sub-requirements for card data
    • Contractual enforcement via payment brands and banks
    • CDE scoping with validated network segmentation
    • Quarterly ASV scans and annual penetration tests
    Data Privacy

    K-PIPA

    Personal Information Protection Act (PIPA)

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    18-24 months

    Key Features

    • Mandatory Chief Privacy Officer (CPO) appointment
    • Granular explicit consent for sensitive data
    • 72-hour breach notifications to subjects and PIPC
    • Extraterritorial applicability to foreign entities
    • 10-day response for data subject rights

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    PCI DSS Details

    What It Is

    PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is a global industry standard and contractual framework for protecting cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD). It mandates technical and operational controls for entities storing, processing, or transmitting payment card information, using a control-based approach with 12 core requirements across 6 objectives.

    Key Components

    • 12 requirements in 6 objectives: secure networks, data protection, vulnerability management, access controls, monitoring, policies.
    • Over 300 sub-requirements; evolves via 3-year cycles (v4.0 mandatory since 2024).
    • Compliance via SAQ (self-assessment) or QSA ROC; levels 1-4 by transaction volume; ASV quarterly scans.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Contractual mandate from card brands/acquirers; avoids fines, processing bans.
    • Reduces breach costs ($37/record avg.), builds trust.
    • Enhances security hygiene, supports GDPR alignment.

    Implementation Overview

    • **Assess-Repair-Report cyclescope CDE, gap analysis, remediate, validate.
    • Applies to merchants/service providers globally; costs $5K-$200K+; 3-12 months typical.

    K-PIPA Details

    What It Is

    K-PIPA (Personal Information Protection Act) is South Korea's comprehensive data protection regulation, enacted in 2011 with major amendments in 2020, 2023, and 2024. It protects personal, sensitive, and unique identification information of Korean residents, applying to all data handlers domestically and extraterritorially. Adopting a consent-centric, risk-based approach, it emphasizes transparency, purpose limitation, and accountability.

    Key Components

    • Core principles: consent, data minimization, security, data subject rights.
    • Mandatory Chief Privacy Officer (CPO), granular consents, encryption, access controls.
    • No fixed control count; focuses on obligations like 72-hour breach notifications, 10-day rights responses.
    • Enforced by PIPC with fines up to 3% revenue; no formal certification but ISMS-P aids transfers.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Legal compliance for Korean operations or targeting residents.
    • Mitigates fines (e.g., Google's KRW 70B), builds trust, enables EU adequacy.
    • Enhances risk management, supports AI/innovation via pseudonymization.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, governance, technical controls, training, audits.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries handling Korean data; CPO mandatory.
    • No certification; PIPC audits/enforcement. (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    PCI DSS
    Payment card data security (CHD/SAD)
    K-PIPA
    All personal information of Korean residents

    Industry

    PCI DSS
    Payment processing merchants/service providers globally
    K-PIPA
    All sectors handling Korean personal data

    Nature

    PCI DSS
    Contractual industry standard, voluntary certification
    K-PIPA
    Mandatory national law with fines/imprisonment

    Testing

    PCI DSS
    Quarterly ASV scans, annual ROC/SAQ by QSA
    K-PIPA
    CPO audits, PIAs, no mandatory external certification

    Penalties

    PCI DSS
    Fines, card processing bans via contracts
    K-PIPA
    Up to 3% revenue fines, 5 years imprisonment

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about PCI DSS and K-PIPA

    PCI DSS FAQ

    K-PIPA FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages