Standards Comparison

    PCI DSS

    Mandatory
    2022

    Global standard protecting payment cardholder data security

    VS

    SOX

    Mandatory
    2002

    U.S. law for corporate financial reporting and internal controls

    Quick Verdict

    PCI DSS secures payment card data for merchants worldwide via contractual audits, while SOX mandates financial reporting controls for U.S. public firms with executive criminal liability. Organizations adopt PCI to process cards compliantly; SOX to ensure investor-trusted disclosures.

    Payment Security

    PCI DSS

    Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • 12 requirements organized into 6 control objectives
    • 300+ granular sub-requirements and testing procedures
    • Transaction-volume-based merchant/service provider levels
    • Prohibits storing sensitive authentication data post-authorization
    • Requires quarterly ASV scans and annual pentests
    Financial Reporting

    SOX

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • CEO/CFO certification of financial reports (§302/§906)
    • ICFR management assessment and auditor attestation (§404)
    • PCAOB oversight of public company audits (Title I)
    • Auditor independence and rotation requirements (Title II)
    • Whistleblower protections and document retention (§806/§802)

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    PCI DSS Details

    What It Is

    PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is an industry-mandated security framework for protecting cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD). Developed by the PCI Security Standards Council, it applies a control-based approach with 12 requirements organized into 6 control objectives, focusing on entities storing, processing, or transmitting payment card data.

    Key Components

    • 12 core requirements covering network security, data protection, vulnerability management, access controls, monitoring, and policies.
    • Over 300 sub-requirements with testing procedures.
    • Merchant levels 1-4 and service provider levels 1-2 dictate validation via SAQ, ROC, ASV scans, and QSA audits.
    • v4.0 introduces customized approaches and third-party risk emphasis.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Contractual obligation from payment brands/acquirers, avoiding fines, processing bans, and breach costs ($37/record avg.).
    • Reduces fraud, builds customer trust, and enables market access.
    • Enhances risk management and operational maturity.

    Implementation Overview

    • **Assess-Repair-Report cycleScope CDE, gap analysis, remediate, validate.
    • Applies to all card-handling orgs globally; 6-12 months typical.
    • Ongoing: quarterly scans, annual pentests, semi-annual reviews.

    SOX Details

    What It Is

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX) is a U.S. federal statute mandating enhanced corporate accountability and financial disclosure reliability for public companies. Enacted post-Enron scandals, it targets investor protection through internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR) via a risk-based, control-focused approach using frameworks like COSO.

    Key Components

    • **Three pillarsPCAOB oversight (Title I), auditor independence (Title II), executive certifications and ICFR (Titles III-IV).
    • Key sections: §302 (CEO/CFO certifications), §404 (ICFR assessment and attestation), §409 (real-time disclosures).
    • Built on COSO principles; no fixed controls but requires key controls in entity-level, process, ITGC domains.
    • Compliance model: annual management assessment, auditor attestation (with exemptions for smaller filers).

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for U.S. public companies to avoid penalties, restatements.
    • Enhances governance, reduces fraud risk, improves reporting accuracy.
    • Builds investor trust, lowers cost of capital, aids M&A/IPO readiness.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: scoping, documentation, testing, remediation, monitoring.
    • Applies to public issuers; scales by size (exemptions for EGCs/non-accelerated filers).
    • Requires PCAOB-aligned audits; ongoing via continuous monitoring.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    PCI DSS
    Protecting payment card data (CHD/SAD)
    SOX
    Internal controls over financial reporting (ICFR)

    Industry

    PCI DSS
    Payment processing merchants/service providers globally
    SOX
    U.S. public companies and listed foreign issuers

    Nature

    PCI DSS
    Contractual security standard enforced by card brands
    SOX
    Mandatory federal law with criminal penalties

    Testing

    PCI DSS
    Quarterly ASV scans, annual pentests by QSA/ASV
    SOX
    Annual ICFR assessment, auditor attestation (404b)

    Penalties

    PCI DSS
    Fines, loss of card processing privileges
    SOX
    Criminal fines/imprisonment for executives, SEC enforcement

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about PCI DSS and SOX

    PCI DSS FAQ

    SOX FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages