PCI DSS
Global standard securing payment cardholder data environments
SQF
GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management.
Quick Verdict
PCI DSS secures payment card data for merchants via audits and scans, while SQF ensures food safety through HACCP and GMPs for manufacturers. Organizations adopt PCI DSS for contractual compliance to avoid fines; SQF for GFSI recognition and market access.
PCI DSS
Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS)
Key Features
- 12 requirements across 6 control objectives for CHD protection
- 300+ granular sub-requirements with quarterly ASV scans
- Network segmentation to minimize Cardholder Data Environment scope
- Prohibits storing sensitive authentication data post-authorization
- Levels-based validation via SAQ or QSA-conducted ROC
SQF
Safe Quality Food (SQF) Code Edition 9
Key Features
- Modular architecture with Module 2 backbone and sector GMPs
- HACCP-based Food Safety Plan with validation/verification
- Mandatory full-time SQF Practitioner role
- GFSI-benchmarked third-party certification audits
- Traceability, recall, and crisis management requirements
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
PCI DSS Details
What It Is
PCI DSS (Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard) is a contractual security framework managed by the PCI Security Standards Council. It mandates technical and operational controls to protect cardholder data (CHD) and sensitive authentication data (SAD) for merchants and service providers handling payment cards. Its control-based approach organizes 12 requirements into 6 objectives, focusing on risk mitigation through scoping the Cardholder Data Environment (CDE).
Key Components
- 12 core requirements spanning network security, data protection, vulnerability management, access controls, monitoring, and policies.
- Over 300 sub-requirements with testing procedures.
- Compliance via SAQ (self-assessment) or ROC (QSA audit), plus ASV scans and penetration tests.
- Evolves triennially; v4.0 emphasizes MFA, segmentation, and customized approaches.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives contractual compliance to avoid fines, card-processing bans, and breach costs ($37/record avg.). Enhances fraud reduction, customer trust, and operational maturity. Applicable globally to all card-handling entities.
Implementation Overview
Involves CDE scoping, gap analysis, remediation (segmentation, encryption), validation. Suits all sizes; Levels 1-4 dictate rigor. Ongoing Assess-Repair-Report cycle with annual reviews.
SQF Details
What It Is
Safe Quality Food (SQF) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification program and HACCP-based management system for ensuring food safety and quality across the supply chain. Its primary purpose is to verify consistent production of safe food through risk-based controls, from farm to fork, via modular codes tailored to sectors like manufacturing and storage.
Key Components
- **Modular structureUniversal Module 2 (System Elements) plus sector-specific GMP modules (e.g., Module 11 for processing).
- Core elements: Management commitment, HACCP Food Safety Plan, PRPs, verification/validation, traceability, allergen management, food defense.
- Built on Codex HACCP principles; mandatory SQF Practitioner role.
- Certification via third-party audits with scoring (E/G/C/F grades).
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets retailer/brand requirements as a 'license to trade'.
- Reduces recalls, audit duplication, and supply chain risks.
- Enhances due diligence for regulations like FSMA.
- Builds trust, operational efficiency, and market access.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: Gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification.
- Applies to food manufacturers, distributors; scalable by size/sector.
- Requires annual audits, unannounced checks for ongoing compliance. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | PCI DSS | SQF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Payment card data security (CHD/SAD) | Food safety/quality management systems |
| Industry | Payment processing, merchants, finance | Food manufacturing, storage, distribution |
| Nature | Contractual standard, voluntary certification | GFSI-benchmarked certification scheme |
| Testing | Quarterly ASV scans, annual pen tests | Annual audits, internal audits, unannounced |
| Penalties | Fines, card processing bans | Certification loss, market access denial |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about PCI DSS and SQF
PCI DSS FAQ
SQF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience
Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIS2 in Your Organization
Master NIS2 implementation with our detailed guide. Learn requirements, risk assessment, supply chain security, and compliance steps for your organization. Star

NIST CSF 2.0 Govern Function Deep Dive: Building Executive Cybersecurity Governance from Scratch
Step-by-step blueprint for NIST CSF 2.0 Govern function: templates, RACI matrices, metrics to elevate cybersecurity governance to boardroom level. Reduce breach
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GDPR vs ISO 27018
Discover GDPR vs ISO 27018: EU's binding privacy law with global reach & fines meets cloud PII processor standard extending ISO 27001. Compare scopes, principles & compliance. Secure data now!
CAA vs LEED
CAA vs LEED: Compare Clean Air Act regs with LEED green building standards. Expert strategies, compliance tips, pitfalls & ROI for execs. Master both for sustainable success now.
OSHA vs ISO 27032
Compare OSHA safety standards vs ISO 27032 cybersecurity guidelines. Master compliance for workplace health & digital risks. Boost resilience—discover key differences now!