PIPL
China's national law for personal information protection
EPA
U.S. federal regulations for air, water, waste protection
Quick Verdict
PIPL regulates personal data protection for China-facing operations with strict consent and transfer rules, while EPA enforces environmental standards via emissions limits and permits. Companies adopt PIPL for market access, EPA for legal compliance and sustainability.
PIPL
Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)
Key Features
- Extraterritorial scope targeting Chinese individuals
- Consent-first model without legitimate interests
- Explicit consent for sensitive personal information
- Volume-threshold cross-border security assessments
- Fines up to 5% annual revenue
EPA
EPA Environmental Protection Standards (40 CFR)
Key Features
- Multi-statute standards for air, water, waste control
- Technology- and health-based performance limits
- Facility-specific permitting via NPDES, Title V
- Evidence-driven monitoring, recordkeeping, reporting
- Strict enforcement with civil, criminal penalties
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
PIPL Details
What It Is
PIPL (Personal Information Protection Law) is China's comprehensive national regulation, effective November 1, 2021, with 74 articles across eight chapters. It governs processing of personal information for natural persons in China, applying extraterritorially to foreign organizations providing products/services or analyzing behaviors of Chinese individuals. Employs a risk-based approach emphasizing consent, minimization, and national security, alongside Cybersecurity Law and Data Security Law.
Key Components
- **Core principlesLawfulness, necessity, minimization, transparency, accountability.
- Seven legal bases, consent primary; no broad legitimate interests.
- Sensitive personal information (SPI: biometrics, health) requires explicit consent.
- Individual rights (access, deletion, portability); cross-border mechanisms (SCCs, security reviews).
- Compliance via audits, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for China-exposed entities; fines up to RMB 50M or 5% revenue. Enables market access, builds consumer trust, reduces breach risks, supports cross-border operations.
Implementation Overview
Phased framework: gap analysis, data mapping, policies, controls, monitoring. Targets multinationals, platforms; CAC enforcement. Scales for all sizes handling PI; 6-12 months typical.
EPA Details
What It Is
EPA standards are a family of federal regulations under the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, implementing statutes like Clean Air Act (CAA), Clean Water Act (CWA), and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Primary purpose: protect human health and environment via enforceable limits on emissions, discharges, and waste. Approach combines technology-based controls, health-based ambient standards, and risk management.
Key Components
- **AirNAAQS, NSPS, MACT standards, Title V permits.
- **WaterEffluent guidelines, NPDES permits, WQS.
- **WasteRCRA TSDF rules, Subparts AA/BB/CC air emissions. Built on statutory authority codified in 40 CFR, with ~hundreds of numeric limits, monitoring rules. Compliance via permits; no central certification, but audited enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for regulated entities to avoid penalties, shutdowns. Drives risk reduction, operational efficiency, ESG alignment. Enhances stakeholder trust, access to capital; prevents multimillion fines (e.g., Hino Motors $1.6B).
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, EMS build, controls, training, audits. Applies to industrial facilities nationwide; state variations. No certification, but inspections, self-audits key. (178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | PIPL | EPA |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal data collection, processing, transfer | Environmental pollution control, emissions, waste |
| Industry | All sectors handling Chinese personal data, extraterritorial | Energy, manufacturing, chemicals, agriculture, US-wide |
| Nature | Mandatory national privacy law, CAC enforcement | Mandatory federal environmental regulations, EPA enforcement |
| Testing | DPIAs for high-risk processing, internal audits | Emissions monitoring, DMRs, facility inspections |
| Penalties | Up to 5% revenue or RMB 50M, business suspension | Civil fines, injunctions, criminal for knowing violations |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about PIPL and EPA
PIPL FAQ
EPA FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier

One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA
Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & Kubernetes: A Practical Implementation Playbook (AWS/Azure/GCP + IaC)
Translate CIS Controls v8.1 to cloud-native: Kubernetes patterns for IAM, logging, vuln mgmt, hardening on AWS, Azure, GCP + IaC. Practical playbook for teams.
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 45001 vs NERC CIP
Compare ISO 45001 vs NERC CIP: ISO 45001 drives OH&S excellence via PDCA & leadership, while NERC CIP safeguards grid reliability from cyber risks. Uncover key diffs, synergies & tips for integrated compliance.
GDPR vs BRC
Discover GDPR vs BRC: EU data privacy powerhouse meets global food safety benchmark. Key differences, compliance strategies, and expert tips inside. Achieve mastery today!
WEEE vs ISO 13485
Explore WEEE vs ISO 13485: EU e-waste rules meet medical QMS standards. Uncover compliance gaps, recycling targets, risk controls. Master strategies for success now!