What is the primary objective of **GDPR**?

**The primary objective of GDPR is to protect the fundamental rights and freedoms of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data, while ensuring the free movement of such data within the EU.** Enacted as Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and enforceable since May 25, 2018, it replaces the 1995 Data Protection Directive to harmonize rules across member states, addressing technological advancements like big data and AI through core principles in Article 5: lawfulness, fairness and transparency; purpose limitation; data minimisation; accuracy; storage limitation; integrity and confidentiality; and accountability.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **GDPR**?

**GDPR applies to any controller or processor established in the EU, or any non-EU entity offering goods/services to or monitoring the behavior of EU data subjects.** Article 3 defines its extraterritorial scope, capturing global organizations processing personal data—broadly defined in Article 4(1) as any information relating to an identifiable natural person, including IP addresses or genetic data. Mandatory Data Protection Officers (DPOs) are required under Article 37 for public authorities or large-scale systematic monitoring/special category processing.

Does **GDPR** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, GDPR does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for compliance.** Article 42 encourages voluntary certification mechanisms and seals as evidence of conformity, while codes of conduct (Article 40) and Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs, Article 35) for high-risk processing rely on internal accountability (Article 5(2)). Supervisory authorities may request documentation, but enforcement focuses on demonstrable compliance rather than prescribed audits.

How often should an assessment for **GDPR** be performed?

**GDPR requires ongoing, risk-based assessments rather than fixed intervals, with Data Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs) conducted prior to high-risk processing and reviewed if risks change.** Article 35 mandates DPIAs for systematic monitoring or large-scale special category data processing; Article 32 demands continuous evaluation of security measures based on state-of-the-art risks. Records of Processing Activities (ROPAs, Article 30) must be maintained and updated regularly.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **GDPR**?

**Non-compliance with GDPR incurs tiered administrative fines up to €20 million or 4% of total global annual turnover, whichever is higher, for severe violations.** Article 83 distinguishes lesser infringements (up to €10 million or 2%) from core breaches like unlawful processing or accountability failures. Supervisory authorities issue corrective orders, bans, or reprimands; data subjects can seek judicial remedies, with landmark fines including €50 million on Google (2019).

Can **GDPR** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, GDPR principles such as accountability, data subject rights, and lawful processing bases align with frameworks like Brazil's LGPD, California's CCPA, and Japan's APPI.** Its global influence via the "Brussels Effect" has inspired adequacy decisions (Article 45) for equivalent third-country regimes, facilitating data transfers through mechanisms like Standard Contractual Clauses (Article 46) post-Schrems II.

What is the first step to begin implementing **GDPR**?

**The first step to implement GDPR is conducting a comprehensive data mapping exercise to identify all personal data processing activities.** This informs Records of Processing Activities (Article 30), legal bases (Article 6), and accountability demonstrations (Article 5(2)), enabling subsequent DPIAs, DPO appointments, and privacy-by-design integration (Article 25).

What is the primary objective of **BRC**?

**The primary objective of BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety is to ensure the manufacture, processing, and packing of safe, legal, authentic, and quality-assured food products.** It establishes auditable requirements for food manufacturers, including processed foods, ingredients, primary products like fruit/vegetables, and domestic pet foods, through a structured system combining senior management commitment and a Codex HACCP-based food safety plan supported by prerequisite programs (GMP/GHP).

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **BRC**?

**BRC compliance is professionally required for food manufacturers, processors, and packers supplying major retailers and food service companies worldwide.** It targets sites producing own-brand/customer-branded processed foods, raw materials for food manufacturers, primary products, and pet foods under direct site control; retailers mandate GFSI-benchmarked certification like BRCGS for supply chain access, with tens of thousands of sites certified globally.

Does **BRC** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, BRC requires external audits by accredited certification bodies, resulting in third-party certification valid for one year.** Announced or unannounced audits assess compliance across nine clauses (Issue 8), with grading (AA/A/B/C/D, "+" for unannounced) based on non-conformities; fundamental clauses must comply fully, or certification is denied/withdrawn.

How often should an assessment for **BRC** be performed?

**BRC requires annual external certification audits, with internal audits scheduled at least four times yearly across the full scope.** Internal audits must cover all clauses annually, with risk-based frequency; management reviews occur at least annually, and corrective actions/root cause analysis are verified at subsequent audits to sustain certification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **BRC**?

**Non-compliance with BRC results in non-conformities graded minor/major/critical, potentially leading to certification denial, suspension, or withdrawal.** Major non-conformities in fundamental clauses (e.g., HACCP, traceability) require full re-audit; commercial impacts include lost retailer contracts, delisting, increased audit frequency, and reputational damage from recalls tied to failures in allergens, pathogens, or labelling.

An **BRC** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, BRC can be mapped to other GFSI-benchmarked frameworks, providing a foundation for regulatory alignment like FSMA Preventive Controls.** Its HACCP, prerequisite programs, and governance (e.g., senior commitment, internal audits) are comparable or exceed similar requirements, though adaptations for terminology (e.g., PCQI designation) and validation cadences may be needed.

What is the first step to begin implementing **BRC**?

**The first step to implement BRC is securing senior management commitment via a signed food safety policy and defining site scope.** Assemble a multidisciplinary team, conduct a gap analysis against the nine clauses using BRC tools like the Get Started Assessment, and prioritize fundamental requirements (e.g., HACCP plan, site standards) for remediation.

GDPR vs BRC | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

GDPR

Mandatory

2016

EU regulation for personal data protection worldwide

BRC

Voluntary

2022

GFSI-benchmarked standard for food safety in manufacturing

Quick Verdict

GDPR mandates data privacy for all handling EU data globally with hefty fines, while BRC is voluntary food safety certification for manufacturers ensuring retailer access via audits. Companies adopt GDPR for legal compliance, BRC for market entry.

Data Privacy

GDPR

General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

18-24 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope applies to non-EU entities targeting EU residents
Fines up to 4% of global annual turnover for violations
Accountability principle requires demonstrating compliance
Enhanced data subject rights including right to erasure
Mandatory 72-hour personal data breach notification

Food Safety

BRC

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

HACCP-based food safety plan with prerequisites
Senior management commitment and culture plan
Site standards and risk zoning requirements
Environmental monitoring and food defense
Unannounced audits for grading (AA+/A+)

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

GDPR Details

What It Is

The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), or Regulation (EU) 2016/679, is a binding EU regulation enacted in 2016 and enforceable since May 25, 2018. It modernizes data privacy, replacing the 1995 Data Protection Directive, with extraterritorial scope applying to any entity processing EU residents' data globally. Its risk-based, accountability-driven approach mandates lawful processing only with legitimate bases.

Key Components

**Seven core principleslawfulness, fairness, purpose limitation, data minimization, accuracy, storage limitation, integrity/confidentiality, and accountability.
**Data subject rightsaccess, rectification, erasure ('right to be forgotten'), portability, objection.
**ObligationsData Protection Impact Assessments (DPIAs), Records of Processing Activities (ROPA), Data Protection Officer (DPO) appointment for high-risk processors. Compliance enforced by supervisory authorities via fines up to 4% global turnover; no formal certification.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for EU data handlers to avoid severe penalties, legal risks. Enhances trust, reputation; enables secure global data flows. Provides competitive edge as 'gold standard', influences worldwide laws like LGPD, CCPA.

Implementation Overview

Gap analysis, policy redesign, staff training, technical upgrades (e.g., pseudonymization). Applies universally to controllers/processors handling EU data, all sizes/industries. Ongoing audits by DPAs; initial rollout typically 18-24 months during two-year transition, with continuous maintenance.

BRC Details

What It Is

BRCGS Global Standard for Food Safety (Issue 9) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification framework for food manufacturers, processors, and packers. It ensures product safety, legality, authenticity, and quality via a risk-based management system combining senior leadership commitment, Codex HACCP plans, and prerequisite programs (GMP/GHP).

Key Components

Nine core clauses: senior management, HACCP food safety plan, FSQMS, site standards, product/process controls, personnel, high-risk zones, traded products.
Fundamental requirements (e.g., traceability, allergen management, internal audits) critical for certification.
Built on HACCP principles with environmental monitoring, food defense, and root cause analysis.
Grading system (AA/A/B/C/D) via announced/unannounced audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Retailer mandates for supply chain access and reduced audits.
Mitigates recalls from allergens, pathogens, labeling errors.
Enhances compliance (e.g., FSMA), operational resilience, market credibility.
Builds stakeholder trust through third-party verification.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, HACCP development, training, mock audits.
Targets food manufacturers globally; suits mid-large firms.
6-12 months typical, with annual recertification.

Key Differences

Aspect	GDPR	BRC
Scope	Personal data protection and privacy	Food safety, quality, manufacturing controls
Industry	All sectors processing EU data globally	Food manufacturing, packaging, supply chain
Nature	Mandatory EU regulation with fines	Voluntary GFSI certification standard
Testing	DPIAs, audits by supervisory authorities	Annual on-site third-party audits
Penalties	Up to 4% global turnover fines	Certification loss, no legal fines

Scope

GDPR

Personal data protection and privacy

BRC

Food safety, quality, manufacturing controls

Industry

GDPR

All sectors processing EU data globally

BRC

Food manufacturing, packaging, supply chain

Nature

GDPR

Mandatory EU regulation with fines

BRC

Voluntary GFSI certification standard

Testing

GDPR

DPIAs, audits by supervisory authorities

BRC

Annual on-site third-party audits

Penalties

GDPR

Up to 4% global turnover fines

BRC

Certification loss, no legal fines

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about GDPR and BRC

GDPR FAQ

BRC FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs ISO 14064

Compare ISO 9001 vs ISO 14064: Quality management meets GHG emissions accounting. Discover key differences, benefits & integration for sustainable business success.

ISO 26000 vs C-TPAT

ISO 26000 vs C-TPAT: Compare social responsibility guidance & supply chain security. Align standards for ESG compliance, risk mgmt & sustainability. Discover key diffs now!

EPA vs ISO 14064

Compare EPA standards (CAA, CWA, RCRA) vs ISO 14064: mandatory U.S. regs vs voluntary GHG verification. Key diffs, compliance strategies—master both now!

GDPR

BRC

Quick Verdict

GDPR

Key Features

BRC

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

GDPR Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

BRC Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

GDPR FAQ

What is the primary objective of GDPR?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with GDPR?

Does GDPR require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for GDPR be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with GDPR?

Can GDPR be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing GDPR?

BRC FAQ

What is the primary objective of BRC?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with BRC?

Does BRC require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for BRC be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with BRC?

An BRC be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing BRC?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 9001 vs ISO 14064

ISO 26000 vs C-TPAT

EPA vs ISO 14064