What is the primary objective of **PIPL**?

**PIPL's primary objective is to protect natural persons' personal information rights and interests while regulating handling activities to promote reasonable data use.** Enacted August 20, 2021, and effective November 1, 2021, the law's 74 articles establish principles of lawfulness, necessity, minimization, transparency, accuracy, integrity, confidentiality, and accountability for processing personal information of individuals in China.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **PIPL**?

**PIPL requires compliance from all personal information handlers—organizations or individuals—processing data of natural persons within China, with extraterritorial reach to foreign entities targeting China.** This includes domestic and multinational firms providing products/services to or analyzing behaviors of Chinese individuals; handlers must appoint a China-based representative if outside China (Article 53). Critical Information Infrastructure Operators (**CIIOs**) and large-scale processors (e.g., >1 million individuals) face heightened duties, including appointing a Personal Information Protection Officer (**PIPO**).

Does **PIPL** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**PIPL does not universally mandate external audits or third-party certification but requires them in specific scenarios like high-volume cross-border transfers.** Handlers processing personal information (**PI**) of >10 million individuals must conduct compliance audits at least every two years; >1 million requires a designated audit lead. Certification is an option for cross-border transfers (e.g., alongside **SCCs**), with **CAC** security reviews mandatory for transfers exceeding 1 million individuals' PI or 10,000 **sensitive PI** (**SPI**) cases.

How often should an assessment for **PIPL** be performed?

**PIPL requires **Personal Information Protection Impact Assessments (PIPIAs)** before high-risk processing, with regular internal compliance audits ongoing.** PIPIAs are mandatory prior to handling **SPI**, automated decision-making (**ADM**), cross-border transfers, or activities significantly impacting individuals (Article 55); retain records for at least three years. Large handlers (>10 million PI) audit every two years; all must perform periodic security audits and risk reassessments amid regulatory changes.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **PIPL**?

**Non-compliance with PIPL incurs administrative fines up to **RMB 50 million** or **5% of prior-year global annual revenue** (whichever higher), plus personal liability for executives up to RMB 1 million.** Grave violations trigger business suspension, license revocation, and criminal penalties for severe cases (Article 66). The **CAC** enforces via inspections, with examples like Didi's RMB 1.2 billion fine; civil suits shift proof burden to handlers.

Can **PIPL** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, PIPL shares core principles like data minimization and accountability with frameworks such as GDPR but requires distinct mapping due to differences like no "legitimate interests" basis and stricter consent/SPI rules.** Alignments exist in extraterritorial scope, individual rights, and **PIPIA**/DPIA equivalents, but PIPL's national security ties (e.g., CIIO localization) and consent primacy necessitate gap analyses for cross-border operations.

What is the first step to begin implementing **PIPL**?

**The first step for PIPL implementation is conducting a comprehensive gap analysis and data mapping to inventory PI flows, classify **SPI**, and identify legal bases.** Phase 1 involves cataloging systems, processors, volumes, purposes, retention, and transfers using tools like data flow diagrams, prioritizing customer-facing and **SPI** activities to build a processing register and risk heatmap (per implementation frameworks).

What is the primary objective of **GLBA**?

**The primary objective of GLBA is to require financial institutions to explain their information-sharing practices and safeguard nonpublic personal information (NPI).** Enacted in 1999, GLBA's Title V mandates transparency via the **Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)**—initial and annual notices plus opt-out rights for nonaffiliated third-party sharing—and security via the **Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)**, requiring a written information security program with administrative, technical, and physical safeguards. Anti-pretexting provisions prohibit obtaining NPI under false pretenses.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **GLBA**?

**GLBA applies to any "financial institution" significantly engaged in financial activities handling NPI, including non-banks under FTC jurisdiction.** Covered entities include banks, mortgage lenders, payday lenders, debt collectors, tax preparers, check cashers, credit counselors, and auto dealers arranging financing. The FTC enforces for non-banks; banking regulators (OCC, Federal Reserve) oversee others. Entities with fewer than 5,000 customers have limited exemptions from some written requirements but must maintain reasonable safeguards.

Does **GLBA** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**No, GLBA does not mandate external audits or third-party certification.** The **Safeguards Rule** requires internal development and maintenance of an information security program, including periodic risk assessments, vulnerability scans, and penetration testing (annual for critical systems). Organizations must designate a **Qualified Individual** for oversight and provide annual written reports to the board or senior officer, with evidence of testing and remediation retained for regulatory review.

How often should an assessment for **GLBA** be performed?

**Risk assessments under GLBA must be performed periodically, at least annually, and upon material changes in operations, technology, or threats.** The revised **Safeguards Rule** (effective June 9, 2023) mandates written assessments inventorying NPI, evaluating threats, and defining risk criteria. Vulnerability assessments occur semi-annually; penetration testing is annual for critical systems. Reassessments follow security events or business changes.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **GLBA**?

**Non-compliance with GLBA can result in civil penalties up to $100,000 per violation for institutions and $10,000 per violation for individuals, plus up to 5 years imprisonment for willful violations.** FTC enforcement includes cases like Equifax and PayPal, imposing multimillion-dollar fines, remediation, and consent decrees. Additional risks: reputational damage, state AG actions, litigation, and mandatory FTC breach notifications (within 30 days for 500+ consumers, effective May 13, 2024).

Can **GLBA** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, GLBA elements map effectively to frameworks like NIST CSF, NIST SP 800-53, and ISO 27001.** The **Safeguards Rule**'s risk assessments, access controls, encryption, and incident response align with NIST's Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover functions. Privacy notices and opt-outs parallel ISO 27001's information security policies, enabling integrated compliance programs without independent standards references here.

What is the first step to begin implementing **GLBA**?

**The first step for GLBA implementation is scoping applicability and conducting a data inventory of NPI flows.** Determine if your entity qualifies as a financial institution, map where NPI is collected, stored, transmitted, and shared (including vendors). Appoint a **Qualified Individual** and perform a written risk assessment to prioritize safeguards, aligning with **Privacy** and **Safeguards Rules**.

PIPL vs GLBA | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

PIPL

Mandatory

2021

China's comprehensive regulation for personal information protection

GLBA

Mandatory

1999

U.S. law for financial privacy notices and data safeguards

Quick Verdict

PIPL mandates comprehensive personal data protection for China operations with strict consent and transfers, while GLBA requires US financial firms to provide privacy notices and security programs. Companies adopt PIPL for China market access, GLBA to avoid FTC penalties.

Data Privacy

PIPL

Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Extraterritorial scope for foreign processors targeting China
Explicit separate consent required for sensitive personal information
Volume-threshold security reviews for cross-border data transfers
Fines up to 5% of annual revenue for violations
No legitimate interests basis; consent-first processing model

Financial Privacy

GLBA

Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Privacy notices and opt-out rights for NPI sharing
Comprehensive written information security program
Qualified Individual with board reporting requirement
30-day breach notification for 500+ consumers
Service provider oversight and risk assessment

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

PIPL Details

What It Is

PIPL (Personal Information Protection Law) is China's comprehensive national regulation, effective November 1, 2021, with 74 articles across eight chapters. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, disclosure, and deletion of personal information, applying extraterritorially to foreign entities targeting Chinese individuals. Employs a risk-based approach emphasizing consent, minimization, and security, alongside Cybersecurity Law and Data Security Law.

Key Components

Core principles: lawfulness, necessity, minimization, transparency, accountability.
Seven legal bases led by consent; explicit for sensitive personal information (biometrics, health, minors under 14).
Individual rights: access, correction, deletion, portability, ADM explanations.
Cross-border transfers via security reviews, SCCs, or certification with volume thresholds. No formal certification; focuses on compliance audits.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for China-exposed firms; avoids fines up to RMB 50M or 5% revenue. Enables market access, builds trust, reduces breach risks, supports global operations.

Implementation Overview

Phased framework: gap analysis, data mapping, policies, controls, monitoring (6-12 months). Applies to all sizes handling Chinese data; requires PIPOs, DPIAs, in-China representatives for foreigners.

GLBA Details

What It Is

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLBA) is a U.S. federal law enacted in 1999. It establishes privacy and security standards for financial institutions handling nonpublic personal information (NPI). Its primary purpose is consumer protection through transparency in data sharing and risk-based safeguards. GLBA uses a dual approach: Privacy Rule for notices/opt-outs and Safeguards Rule for security programs.

Key Components

**Privacy Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 313)Initial/annual notices, opt-out rights for nonaffiliated sharing.
**Safeguards Rule (16 C.F.R. Part 314)Written security program with 9+ elements like risk assessment, Qualified Individual, board reporting.
**Pretexting protectionsAnti-social engineering measures. No certification; enforced via FTC/banking regulators with civil penalties up to $100,000 per violation.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for financial institutions (broad scope: banks, lenders, tax firms). Drives compliance, reduces breach risk, builds trust. Enhances vendor oversight, incident response; offers competitive edge via demonstrated security.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping, risk assessment, controls (encryption, MFA), training, testing. Applies to U.S. financial entities of all sizes; requires ongoing audits, no formal certification but regulator exams/enforcement.

Key Differences

Aspect	PIPL	GLBA
Scope	Personal info processing, cross-border transfers	Financial privacy notices, security programs
Industry	All sectors in/out China	Financial institutions US-wide
Nature	Mandatory national law	Sectoral regulation with enforcement
Testing	PIPIAs, security reviews	Penetration tests, vulnerability assessments
Penalties	5% revenue or RMB 50M	$100K per violation, civil penalties

Scope

PIPL

Personal info processing, cross-border transfers

GLBA

Financial privacy notices, security programs

Industry

PIPL

All sectors in/out China

GLBA

Financial institutions US-wide

Nature

PIPL

Mandatory national law

GLBA

Sectoral regulation with enforcement

Testing

PIPL

PIPIAs, security reviews

GLBA

Penetration tests, vulnerability assessments

Penalties

PIPL

5% revenue or RMB 50M

GLBA

$100K per violation, civil penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about PIPL and GLBA

PIPL FAQ

GLBA FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

Master NIST CSF 2.0 structure: Govern + 5 Core functions, Tiers (Partial-Adaptive), Profiles for gaps, and real-world apps. Build effective cyber risk strategie

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide for Extending Your ISO 27001 ISMS to PIMS

Extend ISO 27001 ISMS to ISO 27701 PIMS with this step-by-step roadmap. Master role-specific controls, avoid pitfalls, meet certification evidence needs for pri

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27017 vs ISO 27701

Compare ISO 27017 vs ISO 27701: Cloud security extensions vs privacy PIMS. Uncover differences, shared responsibilities, controls & benefits for CSPs—choose wisely now.

RoHS vs NIST 800-53

Explore RoHS vs NIST 800-53: EU hazardous substance limits for EEE compliance vs US security/privacy controls. Uncover scopes, strategies & risks to streamline global ops. Expert guide awaits!

DORA vs ENERGY STAR

DORA vs ENERGY STAR: Compare EU financial ICT resilience regs with US energy efficiency benchmarks. Key diffs, compliance tips & benefits for pros—boost resilience now!

PIPL

GLBA

Quick Verdict

PIPL

Key Features

GLBA

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

PIPL Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

GLBA Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

PIPL FAQ

What is the primary objective of PIPL?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with PIPL?

Does PIPL require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for PIPL be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with PIPL?

Can PIPL be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing PIPL?

GLBA FAQ

What is the primary objective of GLBA?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with GLBA?

Does GLBA require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for GLBA be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with GLBA?

Can GLBA be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing GLBA?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Breaking Down NIST CSF 2.0 Structure: Core, Tiers, Profiles, and Real-World Application

ISO 27701 Implementation Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide for Extending Your ISO 27001 ISMS to PIMS

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

ISO 27017 vs ISO 27701

RoHS vs NIST 800-53

DORA vs ENERGY STAR