PIPL
China’s comprehensive law for personal information protection
ISO 27018
International code for PII protection in public clouds.
Quick Verdict
PIPL mandates comprehensive personal data protection for China operations with strict fines, while ISO 27018 offers voluntary cloud PII controls via ISO 27001 audits. Companies adopt PIPL for legal compliance in China; ISO 27018 for trusted cloud procurement.
PIPL
Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL)
Key Features
- Extraterritorial application to foreign processors targeting China
- Consent-first model without legitimate interests basis
- Explicit separate consent for sensitive personal information
- Tiered cross-border transfer mechanisms with volume thresholds
- Penalties up to 5% annual revenue or RMB 50 million
ISO 27018
ISO/IEC 27018:2025 Code of practice for PII protection
Key Features
- PII protection controls for public cloud processors
- Subprocessor transparency and location disclosure
- Prohibits unauthorized PII use like advertising
- Mandates customer breach notification procedures
- Supports data subject rights fulfillment
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
PIPL Details
What It Is
Personal Information Protection Law (PIPL) is China's first comprehensive national regulation on personal information processing, enacted August 2021 and effective November 1, 2021. It governs collection, use, storage, transfer, and deletion of personal data for natural persons in China, with extraterritorial scope for foreign entities targeting Chinese individuals. PIPL uses a risk-based approach, emphasizing consent, data minimization, and national security alongside the Cybersecurity Law and Data Security Law.
Key Components
- Core principles: lawfulness, necessity, minimization, transparency, accountability.
- Seven legal bases, consent-dominant without broad legitimate interests.
- Sensitive personal information (SPI) rules requiring explicit consent.
- Cross-border transfers via security assessments, SCCs, or certification.
- Individual rights: access, rectification, deletion, portability, ADM explanations. Compliance via CAC enforcement, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mandatory for China-exposed firms to avoid fines up to 5% annual revenue.
- Enables market access, builds consumer trust, reduces breach risks.
- Supports operational resilience, strategic data flows in digital economy.
Implementation Overview
Phased framework: gap analysis, data mapping, governance, controls, audits. Targets multinationals, platforms handling Chinese data; requires DPOs, PIPIAs, ongoing monitoring.
ISO 27018 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27018:2025 is a code of practice extending ISO/IEC 27001 and ISO/IEC 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public cloud services where providers act as PII processors. Its primary scope focuses on cloud-specific privacy risks like multi-tenancy and cross-border data flows. It employs a risk-based approach, adding privacy-specific controls to the ISMS framework.
Key Components
- Approximately 25–30 additional privacy controls mapped to ISO 27001 Annex A themes (Organizational, People, Physical, Technological).
- Core principles: consent/choice, purpose limitation, data minimization, transparency, accountability.
- Built on ISO 29100 privacy framework; assessed via ISO 27001 certification audits, not standalone.
Why Organizations Use It
- Builds customer trust and accelerates procurement.
- Aligns with GDPR Article 28, HIPAA; aids regulatory compliance.
- Mitigates privacy risks, supports cyber insurance.
- Differentiates CSPs in competitive markets.
Implementation Overview
- Conduct gap analysis against existing ISMS.
- Integrate controls into Statement of Applicability, update contracts/training.
- Applicable to CSPs of all sizes; requires accredited ISO 27001 audits with 27018 review.
Key Differences
| Aspect | PIPL | ISO 27018 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Personal info processing, cross-border transfers, rights | PII protection in public cloud processors |
| Industry | All sectors handling China data, extraterritorial | Cloud service providers globally |
| Nature | Mandatory national law with enforcement | Voluntary code of practice, ISO 27001 extension |
| Testing | CAC security reviews, DPIAs for high-risk | ISO 27001 audits including privacy controls |
| Penalties | Fines up to 5% revenue, business suspension | Loss of certification, no legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about PIPL and ISO 27018
PIPL FAQ
ISO 27018 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Using CIS Controls v8.1 as a ‘Compliance On-Ramp’: Map One Security Program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2
Use CIS Controls v8.1 as your compliance on-ramp. Map one security program to NIST CSF, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, and NIS2 without duplicating work via practical mapp

5 Ways Modern Compliance Software Makes Evolving Regulations Your Strategic Advantage
Discover 5 ways modern compliance software turns evolving regulations into strategic advantage. Automate monitoring, cut 3x non-compliance costs, stay audit-rea

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization
Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
RoHS vs ISO 45001
Explore RoHS vs ISO 45001: EU rules restricting 10 hazardous substances in EEE vs global OH&S management for proactive worker safety. Master compliance strategies now!
CSL (Cyber Security Law of China) vs GRI
Discover CSL vs GRI: China's Cybersecurity Law on data security & localization vs GRI sustainability standards. Master compliance strategies for global firms today.
ISO 31000 vs SOX
ISO 31000 vs SOX: Compare flexible global risk guidelines to U.S. financial controls law. Boost governance, cut compliance risks—ideal for execs. Dive in now!