GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/PMBOK vs AS9110C
    Standards Comparison

    PMBOK vs AS9110C

    PMBOK

    Voluntary
    2021

    Global standard for project management practices and governance

    VS

    AS9110C

    Mandatory
    2016

    International QMS standard for aviation maintenance organizations.

    Quick Verdict

    PMBOK provides flexible project governance for all industries, while AS9110C mandates rigorous QMS for aerospace MROs ensuring airworthiness and traceability. Organizations adopt PMBOK for delivery success, AS9110C for regulatory compliance and market access.

    Project Management

    PMBOK

    Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Matrix of 5 Process Groups and 10 Knowledge Areas
    • ITTOs defining inputs, tools, techniques, outputs per process
    • Tailoring for predictive, adaptive, hybrid project lifecycles
    • 12 principles and performance domains for value delivery
    • Planning-dominant with over 50% processes in Planning Group
    Quality Management

    AS9110C

    AS9110C: Quality Management Systems for Aviation Maintenance

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Risk-based thinking in operational planning and execution
    • Configuration management and product traceability controls
    • Counterfeit and suspect parts prevention processes
    • Human factors integration in root cause analysis
    • Continuing airworthiness and maintenance release requirements

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    PMBOK Details

    What It Is

    PMBOK® Guide (Project Management Body of Knowledge) is a PMI standard and guide codifying generally accepted project management practices. It standardizes governance, planning, execution, and closure across industries. Scope covers all project types; approach shifts from process-heavy (6th ed.) to principle- and outcome-based (7th/8th eds.) with tailoring emphasis.

    Key Components

    • 5 Process Groups: Initiating, Planning, Executing, Monitoring/Controlling, Closing.
    • 10 Knowledge Areas: Integration, Scope, Schedule, Cost, Quality, Resources, Communications, Risk, Procurement, Stakeholders.
    • ~49 processes with ITTOs; 12 principles, 8 performance domains in modern versions.
    • Aligns with PMP® certification; no direct guide certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Boosts performance (3x likelihood in high-performers per PMI).
    • Reduces risks via baselines, change control.
    • Supports compliance in regulated sectors through traceability.
    • Enables hybrid delivery, common language for stakeholders.
    • Drives competitive edge, predictability, value realization.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, tailoring, pilots, rollout, improvement.
    • Involves PMO setup, training, tools, change management.
    • Scalable for all sizes/industries; geography-agnostic.
    • Voluntary; internal audits/governance, no mandatory certification.

    AS9110C Details

    What It Is

    AS9110C (AS9110:2016 Rev C) is an international certification standard for quality management systems (QMS) in aviation maintenance organizations, such as repair stations and MRO providers. It builds on ISO 9001:2015 with aerospace-specific requirements for continuing airworthiness, using a risk-based thinking approach across its 10-clause high-level structure.

    Key Components

    • Core pillars: context, leadership, planning, support, operation, evaluation, improvement.
    • Aviation additions: configuration management, counterfeit parts prevention, human factors, traceability, external provider controls.
    • Built on Annex SL framework; no fixed control count, but emphasizes documented information and process approach.
    • Certification via accredited bodies with Stage 1/2 audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Meets customer/OEM contracts and regulatory alignment (FAA/EASA).
    • Mitigates safety risks, ensures traceability for airworthiness.
    • Enhances market access via IAQG OASIS, improves on-time delivery.
    • Builds stakeholder trust through proven QMS effectiveness.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, process design, training, audits (6-12 months typical).
    • Applies to MROs globally, scalable by size.
    • Requires internal audits, management reviews before certification.

    Key Differences

    AspectPMBOKAS9110C
    ScopeProject management principles, processes, lifecycle governanceAerospace MRO quality management, maintenance controls, airworthiness
    IndustryAll industries worldwide, any project typeAerospace maintenance organizations, aviation repair stations
    NatureVoluntary guide and standard, no certification enforcementCertification standard based on ISO 9001, audited compliance
    TestingSelf-assessment, no mandatory audits or certificationInternal audits, management reviews, external certification audits
    PenaltiesNo legal penalties, loss of best practices onlyCertification loss, regulatory non-compliance risks, contract ineligibility

    Scope

    PMBOK
    Project management principles, processes, lifecycle governance
    AS9110C
    Aerospace MRO quality management, maintenance controls, airworthiness

    Industry

    PMBOK
    All industries worldwide, any project type
    AS9110C
    Aerospace maintenance organizations, aviation repair stations

    Nature

    PMBOK
    Voluntary guide and standard, no certification enforcement
    AS9110C
    Certification standard based on ISO 9001, audited compliance

    Testing

    PMBOK
    Self-assessment, no mandatory audits or certification
    AS9110C
    Internal audits, management reviews, external certification audits

    Penalties

    PMBOK
    No legal penalties, loss of best practices only
    AS9110C
    Certification loss, regulatory non-compliance risks, contract ineligibility

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about PMBOK and AS9110C

    PMBOK FAQ

    AS9110C FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

    CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 Ransomware-Resilience Sprint: A 30-60-90 Day Action Plan (With Evidence Checklist)

    Tactical CIS Controls v8.1 IG1 playbook for ransomware resilience. 30-60-90 day sprint with tool-agnostic tasks, ownership & evidence checklists to prove progre

    You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

    You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization

    Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes

    NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

    NIST CSF 2.0 Deep Dive: Mastering the Updated Framework Core Functions

    Unpack NIST CSF 2.0's enhanced Core Functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover. Get SME playbooks, governance shifts & strategies for cyber

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how PMBOK and AS9110C compare against other standards

    Other PMBOK Comparisons

    • PMBOK vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    • PMBOK vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • PMBOK vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • OSHA vs PMBOK
    • PMBOK vs ISO 28000

    Other AS9110C Comparisons

    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs AS9110C
    • AS9110C vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs AS9110C
    • NIST 800-171 vs AS9110C
    • ISO 14001 vs AS9110C
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved