TOGAF
Vendor-neutral framework for enterprise architecture governance
ISO 22301
International standard for business continuity management systems.
Quick Verdict
TOGAF provides enterprise architecture methodology for aligning strategy and IT globally, while ISO 22301 delivers certified BCMS for disruption resilience. Companies adopt TOGAF for governance and reuse, ISO 22301 for recovery plans and compliance trust.
TOGAF
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition
Key Features
- Iterative ADM lifecycle for architecture development
- Content Framework with Metamodel for traceability
- Enterprise Continuum enabling reusable assets
- Architecture Capability Framework for governance
- Reference Models like TRM and III-RM
ISO 22301
ISO 22301:2019 Business continuity management systems
Key Features
- PDCA cycle for continual BCMS improvement
- Business Impact Analysis (BIA) for critical functions
- Risk assessment and recovery strategy development
- Leadership commitment and policy requirements
- Seamless integration with ISO 27001 and others
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
TOGAF Details
What It Is
TOGAF Standard, 10th Edition (The Open Group Architecture Framework) is a vendor-neutral enterprise architecture framework. Its primary purpose is to provide a methodology for designing, planning, implementing, and governing enterprise-wide change. The core approach is the iterative Architecture Development Method (ADM), supporting tailoring for various contexts.
Key Components
- **ADM phasesPreliminary, Vision, Business/Data/Application/Technology Architectures, Opportunities, Migration, Governance, Change Management, plus Requirements Management.
- **Content FrameworkDeliverables, artifacts, building blocks, and Metamodel.
- Enterprise Continuum, Reference Models (TRM, SIB, III-RM), and Architecture Capability Framework.
- No formal certification for organizations; practitioner certifications available.
Why Organizations Use It
Drives strategic alignment, reuse, risk reduction, and efficiency. Enables governance without proprietary lock-in, improves ROI via repositories, supports compliance, and builds stakeholder trust through traceability.
Implementation Overview
Phased rollout: preparation, pilot, scale. Tailor ADM iteratively; establish governance board, repository. Suited for large enterprises across industries; requires skills, tools like ArchiMate repositories.
ISO 22301 Details
What It Is
ISO 22301:2019 is an international certification standard for establishing, implementing, and improving a Business Continuity Management System (BCMS). It provides a risk-based framework using the PDCA (Plan-Do-Check-Act) cycle to protect against disruptions, ensure recovery, and maintain critical operations.
Key Components
- 10 clauses structured on Annex SL for integration with other ISO standards.
- Core elements: context analysis, leadership commitment, BIA (Business Impact Analysis), risk assessment, operational planning, performance evaluation, and continual improvement.
- No prescriptive controls; flexible, tailored requirements.
- Certification valid for 3 years with annual surveillance audits.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates risks from cyberattacks, pandemics, disasters; reduces downtime and losses.
- Meets regulatory demands like EU NIS Directive; builds stakeholder trust.
- Enhances reputation, competitive edge, insurance savings.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, BIA, policy development, training, testing, audits.
- Applicable to all sizes/sectors; 60 days to 6 months typical.
- Two-stage external certification process.
Key Differences
| Aspect | TOGAF | ISO 22301 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Enterprise architecture design, ADM lifecycle, governance | Business continuity management, BCMS, disruption recovery |
| Industry | All industries, global, large enterprises primarily | All sectors, global, critical services like finance/healthcare |
| Nature | Voluntary methodology/framework, no certification required | Voluntary certification standard, auditable BCMS requirements |
| Testing | Iterative ADM phases, compliance reviews, no formal tests | BIA, exercises, internal/external audits, 3-year certification |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, loss of governance effectiveness | No legal penalties, loss of certification/reputation damage |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about TOGAF and ISO 22301
TOGAF FAQ
ISO 22301 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

Practical Implementation Blueprint for Regulation S-K Item 106: Cybersecurity Governance and Risk Management Disclosures in 10-Ks
Step-by-step guide for Item 106 cybersecurity disclosures in 10-Ks: risk management, board oversight, Inline XBRL templates (Dec 2024 compliance). Templates for

CMMC Sustainment Mastery: Continuous Monitoring, Annual Affirmations, and Subcontractor Flow-Down Playbook
Master CMMC sustainment beyond certification: continuous monitoring dashboards, SPRS/eMASS affirmations, enforceable subcontractor clauses. Get templates for ve

The DORA 'Hot Seat' Blueprint: Preparing Leadership and the Management Body for Regulatory Interviews
Prepare your Board & Management Body for DORA audits. Master the human element: demonstrate active oversight & accountability in regulatory interviews. Get the
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FSSC 22000 vs IATF 16949
Unlock FSSC 22000 vs IATF 16949: Compare food safety & automotive QMS standards. Key differences, requirements & implementation tips for supply chain success. Dive in!
K-PIPA vs ISO 28000
Unlock K-PIPA vs ISO 28000: Compare Korea's strict data privacy law with global supply chain security standards. Master compliance gaps, risks & strategies for seamless global ops now!
HITRUST CSF vs ISO 13485
Discover HITRUST CSF vs ISO 13485: certifiable security framework harmonizing 60+ standards vs rigorous medical device QMS. Optimize compliance & reduce risks. Compare now!