PRINCE2
Structured project management methodology for governance and control
APRA CPS 234
Australian prudential standard for information security resilience
Quick Verdict
PRINCE2 provides structured project governance for global organizations, while APRA CPS 234 mandates information security resilience for Australian financial entities. Companies adopt PRINCE2 for repeatable delivery; CPS 234 ensures regulatory compliance and cyber defense.
PRINCE2
PRINCE2 7th Edition (Projects IN Controlled Environments)
Key Features
- Manage by exception using tolerance-based escalation
- Continued business justification throughout project lifecycle
- Management by stages with board authorization gates
- Mandatory tailoring to project scale and context
- Product focus with defined acceptance criteria
APRA CPS 234
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 Information Security
Key Features
- Board ultimate responsibility for information security
- 72-hour APRA notification for material incidents
- Third-party managed assets fully in scope
- Systematic risk-based control testing required
- Internal audit assurance of all controls
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
PRINCE2 Details
What It Is
PRINCE2 7th Edition (Projects IN Controlled Environments) is a process-based project management framework. It provides structured governance, decision rights, and control for projects of any scale. The methodology emphasizes principle-driven, tailored application through seven principles, seven practices, and seven processes spanning the project lifecycle.
Key Components
- **Seven PrinciplesGuiding obligations like continued business justification, manage by exception, and tailoring.
- **Seven PracticesBusiness case, organization, plans, quality, risk, issues, progress—applied continuously.
- **Seven ProcessesStarting up, directing, initiating, controlling stages, product delivery, stage boundaries, closing.
- Certification via Foundation and Practitioner levels for compliance demonstration.
Why Organizations Use It
Delivers repeatable governance, reduces risks via tolerances and stages, ensures auditability. Supports strategic benefits like efficient executive oversight, better success rates through tailoring. Builds stakeholder trust in regulated sectors like public and healthcare.
Implementation Overview
Phased approach: gap analysis, tailoring blueprint, training, pilots, institutionalization. Suits all sizes/industries with scalability; no mandatory certification but recommended for competence.
APRA CPS 234 Details
What It Is
APRA Prudential Standard CPS 234 (Information Security) is a binding prudential regulation issued by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. Effective from 1 July 2019, it mandates regulated financial entities to maintain information security capabilities commensurate with threats to protect confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) of information assets, including those managed by third parties. It adopts a risk-based, assurance-driven approach focused on governance, controls, testing, and rapid notification.
Key Components
- **Governance pillarsBoard ultimate responsibility, defined roles, policy framework.
- **Risk managementAsset classification by criticality/sensitivity, commensurate controls across lifecycle.
- **Operational elementsIncident detection/response plans (annually tested), systematic testing, internal audit assurance.
- No fixed control count; ~24 core paragraphs outline enforceable requirements. Built on CIA triad; compliance via evidence-based assurance, no formal certification.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandated for APRA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, super funds); drives cyber resilience, minimizes incident impacts on customers/depositors. Enhances risk management, stakeholder trust, operational continuity; avoids penalties, supervisory actions.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, asset inventory, policy development, testing programs, third-party assessments. Applies to all sizes of APRA entities in Australia; requires ongoing internal audit, no external certification but APRA scrutiny.
Key Differences
| Aspect | PRINCE2 | APRA CPS 234 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Project management governance, principles, practices, processes | Information security capability, controls, testing, incidents |
| Industry | All sectors globally, any project size | Australian financial services (banks, insurers, super) |
| Nature | Voluntary structured methodology, certification-based | Mandatory prudential regulation, enforceable by APRA |
| Testing | Tailored audits, stage reviews, no mandatory frequency | Systematic independent testing, annual reviews required |
| Penalties | No legal penalties, certification loss only | Regulatory sanctions, fines, license restrictions |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about PRINCE2 and APRA CPS 234
PRINCE2 FAQ
APRA CPS 234 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
What is DORA and which Requirements does the Standard define?
Discover DORA requirements for info security, strict authority monitoring, and steps to achieve compliance. Build a resilient organization with our detailed gui
CMMC Level 3 Implementation Guide: Integrating NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Controls for APT Defense
Step-by-step CMMC Level 3 guide for DIB contractors. Implement 24 NIST SP 800-172 controls on Level 2. Prep for DIBCAC, C3PAO scoping & 180-day POA&Ms. Boost cy
PDPA Cross-Border Transfer Rules Decoded: Singapore, Thailand, and Taiwan Mechanisms Compared with Practical Implementation Templates
Decode PDPA cross-border transfers for Singapore, Thailand, Taiwan. Statutory excerpts, approved mechanisms, SCC templates. Harmonize with GDPR, navigate exempt
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
GMP vs ISO 41001
Compare GMP vs ISO 41001: Key differences in manufacturing quality controls and facility management systems. Discover compliance strategies, risks, and implementation for optimal operations.
ISO 45001 vs CMMI
Explore ISO 45001 vs CMMI: Compare OH&S risk controls & leadership with process maturity levels for integrated excellence. Boost performance—read now!
WEEE vs ISA 95
Discover WEEE vs ISA 95: Compare EU e-waste regs with manufacturing standards. Boost compliance, circular strategy & ops for electronics leaders. Dive in now!