REACH
EU regulation for chemical registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction
SQF
GFSI-benchmarked food safety certification program
Quick Verdict
REACH mandates chemical risk management across EU industries via registration and restrictions, ensuring safety through ECHA oversight. SQF certifies voluntary food safety systems globally with HACCP and audits. Companies adopt REACH for legal compliance, SQF for market access.
REACH
Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 (REACH)
Key Features
- Shifts responsibility to industry for hazard data generation
- Registration required for substances over 1 tonne/year
- Authorisation regime for SVHCs drives substitution
- Annex XVII lists EU-wide restrictions on risks
- Mandatory SVHC communication in supply chain and articles
SQF
Safe Quality Food (SQF) Code
Key Features
- Modular: Module 2 plus sector GMP modules
- HACCP-based Food Safety Plan required
- GFSI-benchmarked for global recognition
- Mandatory SQF Practitioner designation
- Traceability, recall, crisis management emphasis
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
REACH Details
What It Is
REACH (Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006) is a directly applicable EU regulation governing chemicals lifecycle. Its primary purpose is protecting human health and environment by shifting responsibility to industry for identifying and managing chemical risks. Scope covers substances, mixtures, and articles; key approach is tonnage-based data requirements with evaluation, authorisation, and restriction pillars.
Key Components
- Four pillars: Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, Restriction.
- 17 technical annexes defining dossiers, SDS, SVHC lists (Annex XIV), restrictions (Annex XVII).
- Built on industry-generated data, Chemical Safety Reports (CSR) for >10 tonnes/year.
- No certification; continuous compliance via ECHA databases and national enforcement.
Why Organizations Use It
Legal obligation for EU market access; avoids fines, market bans, recalls. Enhances risk management, supply-chain transparency, innovation via substitution. Builds stakeholder trust, supports ESG, provides competitive edge in chemicals-dependent sectors.
Implementation Overview
Phased: gap analysis, substance inventory, dossier preparation via IUCLID, supply-chain SDS communication. Applies to manufacturers/importers/downstream users across industries, EU/EEA geography. Requires cross-functional teams, ongoing monitoring; national audits enforce 'effective, proportionate, dissuasive' penalties.
SQF Details
What It Is
Safe Quality Food (SQF) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification program and HACCP-based management system for food safety and quality. It ensures safe production across supply chains—from farm to retail—using a modular, risk-based approach with universal system elements and sector-specific Good Practices.
Key Components
- **Module 2Core system elements (management commitment, HACCP plan, verification, traceability, allergens, training).
- Sector modules (e.g., Module 11 GMPs for manufacturing).
- 100+ auditable clauses; built on Codex/NACMCF HACCP.
- Third-party audits with scoring (E/G/C/F grades), unannounced options.
Why Organizations Use It
- Meets retailer mandates, aligns with FSMA/EU regs for market access.
- Reduces recalls, audit duplication; builds food safety culture.
- Enhances supplier trust, operational efficiency, resilience.
- Provides "license to trade" globally.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: gap analysis, documentation, training, internal audits, certification.
- Applies to all sizes/industries (manufacturing, storage); SQF Practitioner required.
- Annual audits via licensed bodies; PDCA continuous improvement.
(178 words)
Key Differences
| Aspect | REACH | SQF |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Chemical registration, evaluation, authorisation, restriction | Food safety management, HACCP, GMP, quality systems |
| Industry | Chemicals, manufacturing, all sectors using substances, EU-focused | Food manufacturing, storage, distribution, global food sectors |
| Nature | Mandatory EU regulation, legally binding | Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification |
| Testing | Dossier evaluation by ECHA, substance testing by tonnage | Annual third-party audits, internal verification, validation |
| Penalties | National fines, effective/proportionate/dissuasive penalties | Loss of certification, no direct legal penalties |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about REACH and SQF
REACH FAQ
SQF FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc

You Guide on how to Start Implementing NIST CSF in Your Organization
Master NIST CSF implementation in your organization with this detailed guide. Learn core functions, key steps, best practices, and tips for cybersecurity succes

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365
Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
FDA 21 CFR Part 11 vs ISO 50001
Compare FDA 21 CFR Part 11 electronic records vs ISO 50001 energy systems: Key compliance diffs, validation, audit trails & risk strategies for life sciences. Achieve mastery now!
GDPR vs PIPL
Compare GDPR vs PIPL: EU gold standard meets China's strict regime. Key differences in consent, scope & transfers. Master compliance for global ops now!
IFS Food vs 23 NYCRR 500
Compare IFS Food vs 23 NYCRR 500: Decode key differences in food safety audits & cybersecurity regs. Gain strategies to streamline compliance & boost resilience now!