GRADUM
    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricingBlogCompareSupport
    DashboardSign Up Free
    Blog/Compare/RoHS vs ISO 27018
    Standards Comparison

    RoHS vs ISO 27018

    RoHS

    Mandatory
    2011

    EU directive restricting hazardous substances in EEE

    VS

    ISO 27018

    Voluntary
    2019

    Code of practice for PII protection in public clouds.

    Quick Verdict

    RoHS restricts hazardous substances in electronics for EU market access, while ISO 27018 provides privacy controls for cloud PII processors. Companies adopt RoHS for legal compliance and sales, ISO 27018 for trust and procurement acceleration.

    Hazardous Substances

    RoHS

    Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2) on hazardous substances

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Homogeneous material concentration limits (0.1%/0.01% Cd)
    • Open-scope applies to all EEE unless excluded
    • Time-limited exemptions in Annexes III/IV
    • Technical documentation and EU Declaration of Conformity
    • Tiered testing via IEC 62321 methods
    Cloud Privacy

    ISO 27018

    ISO/IEC 27018:2019 PII protection in public clouds

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Privacy controls for public cloud PII processors
    • Subprocessor transparency and disclosure requirements
    • Breach notification to customers without delay
    • Support for data subject rights handling
    • Prohibits secondary PII use without consent

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    RoHS Details

    What It Is

    RoHS (Directive 2011/65/EU, recast as RoHS 2, amended by 2015/863) is an EU regulation restricting ten hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE). Its primary purpose is protecting health and environment by limiting risks in EEE waste management, improving recyclability alongside WEEE Directive. Scope covers all EEE unless excluded; uses homogeneous material approach with maximum concentration values (MCVs): 0.1% for most, 0.01% for cadmium.

    Key Components

    • Ten restricted substances: Pb, Hg, Cd, Cr(VI), PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP.
    • Annexes III/IV exemptions: time-limited, application-specific.
    • Compliance model: technical documentation (EN IEC 63000), EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC), CE marking; risk-based verification (IEC 62321 testing).

    Why Organizations Use It

    Mandated for EU market access; reduces enforcement risks (fines, recalls). Drives supply chain governance, substitution innovation, ESG benefits, recyclability. Builds stakeholder trust, level playing field.

    Implementation Overview

    Phased: scope analysis, BoM review, supplier declarations, tiered testing (XRF/ICP-MS), technical files. Applies to manufacturers/importers of EEE globally selling to EU; high complexity for supply chains. No certification, but 10-year documentation retention for audits. (178 words)

    ISO 27018 Details

    What It Is

    ISO/IEC 27018 is a code of practice extending ISO 27001 and ISO 27002 for protecting personally identifiable information (PII) in public clouds where providers act as PII processors. Its primary purpose is to provide privacy-specific controls for cloud environments, focusing on multi-tenancy, subprocessors, and data flows. It uses a risk-based approach integrated into an Information Security Management System (ISMS).

    Key Components

    • Core domains: transparency, contractual obligations, data subject rights, breach management, security safeguards.
    • ~25-30 additional privacy controls mapped to ISO 27001 Annex A.
    • Built on principles like consent, purpose limitation, minimization, accountability.
    • Assessed via ISO 27001 audits; no standalone certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Builds customer trust, accelerates procurement.
    • Aligns with GDPR, HIPAA processor obligations.
    • Mitigates privacy risks in clouds.
    • Differentiates CSPs, aids insurance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Gap analysis on existing ISMS, add controls to Statement of Applicability.
    • Involves policy updates, training, audits.
    • Suits CSPs of all sizes; global applicability.
    • Requires third-party audits during ISO 27001 certification.

    Key Differences

    AspectRoHSISO 27018
    ScopeHazardous substances in EEE materialsPII protection in public clouds
    IndustryEEE manufacturers worldwideCloud service providers globally
    NatureMandatory EU directive, voluntary elsewhereVoluntary ISO code of practice
    TestingXRF screening, lab analysis (IEC 62321)ISO 27001 audits with privacy controls
    PenaltiesFines, recalls by Member StatesNo legal penalties, certification loss

    Scope

    RoHS
    Hazardous substances in EEE materials
    ISO 27018
    PII protection in public clouds

    Industry

    RoHS
    EEE manufacturers worldwide
    ISO 27018
    Cloud service providers globally

    Nature

    RoHS
    Mandatory EU directive, voluntary elsewhere
    ISO 27018
    Voluntary ISO code of practice

    Testing

    RoHS
    XRF screening, lab analysis (IEC 62321)
    ISO 27018
    ISO 27001 audits with privacy controls

    Penalties

    RoHS
    Fines, recalls by Member States
    ISO 27018
    No legal penalties, certification loss

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about RoHS and ISO 27018

    RoHS FAQ

    ISO 27018 FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA

    One Step at a Time - a 6 Month Plan to Live and Breath DORA

    Achieve DORA compliance in 6 months with our detailed plan. Learn implementation sequence, starting steps, pitfalls to avoid, and accelerators for success. Toug

    Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency

    Why the SEC Stepped In: The Investor-Driven Push for Cybersecurity Transparency

    Discover why the SEC's 2023 cybersecurity rules treat cyber risks as material financial threats. Explore the 'stick and carrot' approach for standardized disclo

    Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience

    Real-World ISO 27701 Success: Synthesized Case Studies, Metrics, and Lessons for Privacy Resilience

    Real-world ISO 27701 success from Tribeca, Kocho: DSAR efficiency gains, risk score reductions, certification ROI. Synthesized metrics prove privacy resilience

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Explore More Comparisons

    See how RoHS and ISO 27018 compare against other standards

    Other RoHS Comparisons

    • RoHS vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • RoHS vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • RoHS vs ISO/IEC 42001:2023
    • RoHS vs ISO 22301
    • RoHS vs EU AI Act

    Other ISO 27018 Comparisons

    • ISO 27018 vs U.S. SEC Cybersecurity Rules
    • ISO 27018 vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
    • MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) vs ISO 27018
    • ISO/IEC 42001:2023 vs ISO 27018
    • IFS Food vs ISO 27018
    GRADUM

    Transform your assessment process with collaborative, AI-powered maturity evaluations that deliver actionable insights.

    Navigation

    FeaturesMaturity ModelsFor CreatorsPricing

    Legal

    Terms and ConditionsPrivacy PolicyImprintCopyright PolicyCookie Policy

    © 2026 Gradum. All Rights Reserved