RoHS
EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in electrical equipment
ISO 27032
International guidelines for Internet cybersecurity.
Quick Verdict
RoHS restricts hazardous substances in EEE for EU market access, while ISO 27032 provides voluntary cybersecurity guidelines for Internet threats. Companies adopt RoHS for compliance and sales, ISO 27032 for resilience and collaboration.
RoHS
Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2)
Key Features
- Applies 0.1% limits to homogeneous materials in EEE
- Open scope: all electrical equipment unless excluded
- Restricts ten specific hazardous substances including phthalates
- Time-limited exemptions reviewed via delegated directives
- Requires EU Declaration of Conformity and technical file
ISO 27032
ISO/IEC 27032:2023 Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security
Key Features
- Multi-stakeholder collaboration for cyberspace security
- Guidelines for Internet-specific threats and risks
- Annex A mapping to ISO/IEC 27002 controls
- Risk assessment and incident management frameworks
- Emphasis on detection, response, and continuous improvement
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
RoHS Details
What It Is
RoHS (Directive 2011/65/EU, or RoHS 2) is an EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE). It aims to protect health and environment by limiting risks in EEE waste management, complementing WEEE Directive. Scope is open: all EEE unless excluded. Key approach: homogeneous material concentration limits (0.1% for most substances, 0.01% for cadmium).
Key Components
- Ten restricted substances: Pb, Hg, Cd, Cr(VI), PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP.
- Annexes III/IV for time-limited exemptions.
- Compliance via technical documentation per EN IEC 63000.
- No certification; self-declared EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC) and CE marking where applicable.
Why Organizations Use It
Mandatory for EU market access; non-compliance risks fines, recalls. Drives supply chain governance, substitution innovation, recyclability. Enhances ESG reputation, level playing field.
Implementation Overview
Risk-based: scope analysis, BoM review, supplier declarations, tiered testing (**IEC 62321XRF screening, ICP-MS/GC-MS confirmation), technical files (10-year retention). Applies to manufacturers/importers of EEE; scales with portfolio complexity. Member State enforcement.
ISO 27032 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 27032:2023, titled Cybersecurity – Guidelines for Internet Security, is an international guidance standard (not certifiable) from ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 27. It provides collaborative, stakeholder-driven guidelines for managing Internet security risks within cyberspace, connecting information security, network security, Internet security, and CIIP. Its risk-based approach emphasizes multi-stakeholder ecosystems over siloed controls.
Key Components
- Covers threats, vulnerabilities, and controls mapped to ISO/IEC 27002 in Annex A.
- Focuses on ~14 thematic domains (2012 edition), refined for Internet issues like phishing, DDoS, and supply-chain risks.
- Core principles: collaboration, risk assessment, incident management, awareness.
- Non-certifiable; integrates into ISO 27001 ISMS via Statement of Applicability.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates regulatory risks (e.g., NIS2, GDPR fines), operational disruptions, reputational damage.
- Builds resilience, efficiency, trust; enables market access, insurance savings.
- Differentiates in competitive landscapes via ecosystem collaboration.
Implementation Overview
- Phased: scoping, risk assessment, controls, monitoring (PDCA cycle).
- Applies to all sizes/industries with online presence; global scope.
- No formal certification; self-assess, audit integration with existing frameworks.
Key Differences
| Aspect | RoHS | ISO 27032 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Hazardous substances in EEE materials | Cybersecurity guidelines for Internet security |
| Industry | EEE manufacturers, electronics globally | All organizations using Internet worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory EU directive, market access | Voluntary non-certifiable guidelines |
| Testing | Material analysis (XRF, IEC 62321) | Risk assessments, audits, no mandated tests |
| Penalties | Fines, recalls by Member States | No direct penalties, reputational risks |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about RoHS and ISO 27032
RoHS FAQ
ISO 27032 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software
Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for
CIS Controls v8.1, Operationalized: Top 10 Reasons Compliance Monitoring Software Accelerates Real-World Implementation
Operationalize CIS Controls v8.1 with compliance monitoring software. Turn checklists into dashboards, tickets, and audit-proof workflows. Top 10 reasons it acc
NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers Roadmap: Step-by-Step Guide from Partial to Adaptive Cybersecurity Maturity
Master NIST CSF 2.0 Implementation Tiers with a step-by-step roadmap. Assess your tier, build gap analyses, and advance from Partial (Tier 1) to Adaptive (Tier
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
ISO 30301 vs 23 NYCRR 500
Compare ISO 30301 vs 23 NYCRR 500: Align records governance with NY cybersecurity for financial compliance. Boost risk management, audit readiness & certification—read now!
GDPR UK vs ISO 27701
Compare GDPR UK vs ISO 27701: Key differences in principles, enforcement, DPIAs & transfers. Align compliance for ICO fines avoidance & PIMS certification. Read now!
PCI DSS vs NIST 800-53
PCI DSS vs NIST 800-53: Compare payment security standards vs federal privacy controls. Key differences, overlaps & implementation guide for compliance success. Secure smarter now!