RoHS
EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in EEE
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
International standard for AI management systems
Quick Verdict
RoHS restricts hazardous substances in EEE for EU market access, while ISO/IEC 42001:2023 provides voluntary AIMS certification for responsible AI governance. Companies adopt RoHS to avoid penalties and sell in Europe; ISO 42001 builds trust, compliance, and innovation edge.
RoHS
Directive 2011/65/EU (RoHS 2) on hazardous substances
Key Features
- Restricts 10 substances at 0.1% in homogeneous materials
- Open-scope covers all EEE unless explicitly excluded
- Time-limited exemptions via Annexes III and IV
- Requires technical file and EU Declaration of Conformity
- Tiered verification using IEC 62321 testing standards
ISO/IEC 42001:2023
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial intelligence — Management system
Key Features
- PDCA-based AIMS framework for AI governance
- Mandatory AI Impact Assessments for high-risk AI
- Annex A with 38 AI-specific controls
- Full AI lifecycle management from inception to retirement
- Seamless integration with ISO 27001 and 9001
Detailed Analysis
A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.
RoHS Details
What It Is
RoHS (Directive 2011/65/EU, recast as RoHS 2) is an EU regulation restricting hazardous substances in electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) to protect health and environment during waste management. It applies an open-scope approach to all EEE unless excluded, using homogeneous material thresholds (0.1% w/w for most substances, 0.01% for cadmium).
Key Components
- Restricts 10 substances (Pb, Hg, Cd, Cr(VI), PBB, PBDE, DEHP, BBP, DBP, DIBP).
- Annexes III/IV for time-limited exemptions.
- Compliance via technical documentation, EU Declaration of Conformity (DoC), and CE marking.
- Supported by IEC 63000 (documentation) and IEC 62321 (testing).
Why Organizations Use It
Ensures EU market access, reduces recycling risks, and complements WEEE Directive. Mitigates fines, recalls, and supply disruptions; enhances sustainability, ESG reporting, and competitive edge.
Implementation Overview
Risk-based: scope products, map BoMs to materials, collect supplier declarations, tiered testing (XRF screening, lab confirmation), build technical files. Applies to manufacturers/importers of EEE; 10-year retention for audits. Suits all sizes, global supply chains.
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Details
What It Is
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 is the world's first international standard for Artificial Intelligence Management Systems (AIMS). It provides a certifiable framework to establish, implement, maintain, and improve AI governance using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) methodology and High-Level Structure (HLS), addressing AI risks like bias, transparency, and ethics across the full lifecycle.
Key Components
- Clauses 4-10 cover context, leadership, planning, support, operations, evaluation, and improvement.
- **Annex A38 AI-specific controls for risks such as data governance and resiliency.
- Built on ISO management systems like ISO 27001 and ISO 9001.
- Third-party certification via accredited auditors with 3-year validity and surveillance.
Why Organizations Use It
- Mitigates AI risks, ensures ethical practices, and aligns with regulations like EU AI Act.
- Builds stakeholder trust, enhances reputation, and enables competitive differentiation.
- Drives innovation while managing opportunities and compliance.
Implementation Overview
- Phased approach: gap analysis, risk assessments (AIIAs), training, audits.
- Applicable to all sizes, sectors, AI roles (providers/users).
- Typical 6-12 months with tools like ISMS.online; integrates existing ISO systems.
Key Differences
| Aspect | RoHS | ISO/IEC 42001:2023 |
|---|---|---|
| Scope | Hazardous substances in EEE materials | AI management systems lifecycle governance |
| Industry | EEE manufacturers globally | All AI organizations worldwide |
| Nature | Mandatory EU directive | Voluntary certification standard |
| Testing | XRF/ICP-MS on homogeneous materials | Audits and AI impact assessments |
| Penalties | Fines/recalls by Member States | Loss of certification |
Scope
Industry
Nature
Testing
Penalties
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about RoHS and ISO/IEC 42001:2023
RoHS FAQ
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 FAQ
You Might also be Interested in These Articles...
The Human-AI Synergy: How Modern Compliance Tools Amplify Your Team's Strategic Impact
Unlock human-AI synergy with modern compliance tools. Automate monitoring, cut non-compliance risks 3x, and boost strategic decision-making. Elevate your team's
The 'Black Box' Risk: Why Human-in-the-Loop is the Ultimate Fail-Safe for 2026 Security Operations
Uncover the black box AI risk in security ops. Learn why human-in-the-loop auditing is crucial for 2026. Upskill analysts to ensure data privacy and robust secu
SOC 2 for Bootstrapped SaaS: Lazy Founder's Automation Roadmap with Vanta/Drata Templates
Bootstrapped SaaS founders: Achieve SOC 2 Type 2 in 3 months with Vanta automation (cuts 70% manual work). Free templates, workflows, screenshots, metrics & Sig
Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM
Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform
Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.
Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages
CE Marking vs SAMA CSF
Compare CE Marking vs SAMA CSF: EU product safety vs Saudi financial cyber framework. Master compliance differences, strategies & global market access now.
WEEE vs SQF
Discover WEEE vs SQF: EU e-waste Directive (2012/19/EU) vs GFSI food safety standards. Key differences, compliance strategies & implementation for producers. Optimize now! (152 characters)
CMMC vs GLBA
CMMC vs GLBA: DoD cybersecurity tiers (NIST 800-171/172 Levels 1-3) vs financial privacy/safeguards rules. Frameworks, pitfalls, strategies for DIB & finance compliance edge.