What is the primary objective of **WEEE**?

**The primary objective of WEEE (Directive 2012/19/EU) is to prevent waste generation from electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) and promote its preparation for re-use, recycling, and recovery to minimize environmental and health risks.** It implements **Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR)**, requiring separate collection at targets of **65%** of average EEE placed on the market (POM) over three prior years or **85%** of WEEE generated, with open scope since **15 August 2018** covering six Annex III categories.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **WEEE**?

**Producers—defined as manufacturers, brand owners, importers, and distance sellers placing EEE on EU markets—are legally required to comply with WEEE.** This includes registration in each Member State's national register via the **European WEEE Registers Network (EWRN)**, POM reporting per **Regulation 2017/699**, and financing collection/treatment via collective **Producer Responsibility Organizations (PROs)** or individual schemes. Distributors must provide free **one-for-one** take-back and accept **very small WEEE** (≤**25 cm**) if sales area ≥**400 m²**.

Does **WEEE** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**WEEE does not mandate external audits or third-party certification for producers.** Compliance relies on national enforcement, self-reported data per **Regulation 2019/290** formats, and evidence retention for inspections. Treatment facilities require permits and adherence to **Annex II** selective treatment, with PROs and recyclers subject to regular audits under national rules.

How often should an assessment for **WEEE** be performed?

**WEEE assessments should be performed annually to align with mandatory POM reporting deadlines set by national registers.** Ongoing monitoring is required for product classification changes under open scope, with harmonized formats per **Decision 2019/2193** ensuring quarterly internal reconciliations of sales data against PRO fees and collection evidence.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **WEEE**?

**Non-compliance with WEEE results in national penalties including financial fines, market access restrictions, and legal actions enforced by Member States.** Producers face retroactive fees, sales bans for unregistered EEE, and costs for illegal shipments under **Annex VI** (e.g., inspection/storage charges). Reputational harm and PRO delisting compound risks.

Can **WEEE** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**WEEE cannot be formally mapped to other international frameworks as it is a standalone EU binding directive with national transpositions.** Its EPR model and open scope are unique, though complementary to related EU rules; cross-framework alignment requires jurisdiction-specific analysis.

What is the first step to begin implementing **WEEE**?

**The first step to implement WEEE is to register as a producer in each Member State's national authority via the EWRN.** Identify EEE scope per **Annex III** categories, calculate POM weights using **Regulation 2017/699** methodology, and join a PRO or appoint an authorized representative for non-EU sellers.

What is the primary objective of **SQF**?

**The primary objective of SQF is to provide a rigorous, HACCP-based food safety management system that assures the production of safe food products through documented controls, implementation, and verification.** SQF, administered by the SQF Institute (SQFI), integrates **Module 2 System Elements** (management commitment, HACCP Food Safety Plan, verification, traceability) with sector-specific Good Practices modules (e.g., **Module 11** for food manufacturing GMPs). This GFSI-benchmarked framework ensures "say what you do, do what you say, prove it" via PRPs, supplier approval, allergen management, food defense, and annual audits.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SQF**?

**SQF compliance is not legally mandated but is a professional requirement for suppliers to major retailers, brand owners, and foodservice providers worldwide.** Over 14,000 sites in 40+ countries pursue certification as a "license to trade," particularly in food manufacturing (**Module 2 + 11**), storage/distribution, packaging, and primary production. Sites must designate a full-time, on-site **SQF Practitioner** with HACCP competency; senior management commits via signed policy and reviews.

Does **SQF** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, SQF mandates external audits by SQFI-licensed Certification Bodies accredited to ISO/IEC 17065 for third-party certification.** Initial certification audits cover **Module 2** and applicable GMP modules, with annual surveillance, recertification every 3 years, and unannounced audits (e.g., every 3 years). Nonconformities are graded (minor=1pt, major=5pts, critical=50pts); scores determine grades (E:96-100, F:<70), with CB technical review.

How often should an assessment for **SQF** be performed?

**SQF requires annual external certification audits, with internal audits performed regularly to maintain system verification.** **Management reviews** occur at least annually (with monthly **SQF Practitioner** updates), covering audits, CAPA, complaints, and hazards. Internal audits (2.5.5) must cover all elements; crisis/recall plans are tested annually. Gap assessments are advised 60-90 days pre-certification.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SQF**?

**Non-compliance with SQF results in audit failure, certification denial/suspension, and commercial exclusion from GFSI-recognized supply chains.** Critical nonconformities (e.g., uncontrolled hazards) trigger immediate suspension; majors require CAPA closure within 30 days. Repeated failures lead to decertification, lost retailer contracts, increased buyer audits, and heightened recall risks from weak PRPs or traceability.

An **SQF** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, SQF maps to other GFSI-benchmarked frameworks through shared HACCP principles, management systems, and preventive controls.** **Module 2** aligns with universal elements like document control, internal audits, CAPA, and supplier programs in schemes such as BRCGS or FSSC 22000. SQF Quality Code layers atop Food Safety certification, complementing ISO 22000 without dedicated GMP modules.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SQF**?

**The first step to implement SQF is to register the site in the SQFI assessment database and designate a competent, full-time SQF Practitioner.** Select applicable modules (e.g., **Module 2 + 11** for manufacturing), conduct a gap analysis against Edition 9 (effective 2021), and develop the signed **Food Safety Policy** with objectives. Secure executive commitment for resources and cross-functional team.

WEEE vs SQF | GRADUM

Standards Comparison

WEEE

Mandatory

2012

EU Directive for e-waste collection, treatment, and recycling

SQF

Voluntary

2023

GFSI-benchmarked certification for food safety management

Quick Verdict

WEEE mandates EU-wide e-waste management and producer responsibility for electronics firms, enforcing collection and recycling. SQF provides voluntary food safety certification via HACCP and audits for food processors. Companies adopt WEEE for legal compliance, SQF for market access.

Waste Management

WEEE

Directive 2012/19/EU on WEEE

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Mandates Extended Producer Responsibility for EEE end-of-life
Open scope covers all electrical equipment since 2018
Enforces 65% POM or 85% generated collection targets
Requires selective depollution and Annex II treatment standards
Harmonized national registration and annual POM reporting

Agile Scaling

SQF

Safe Quality Food (SQF) Code Edition 9

Cost

€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

6-12 months

Key Features

Modular architecture: Module 2 plus sector GMPs
HACCP-based Food Safety Plan mandatory
Full-time onsite SQF Practitioner required
GFSI-benchmarked for global recognition
Annual graded audits with unannounced

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

WEEE Details

What It Is

Directive 2012/19/EU (WEEE Directive) is a binding EU regulation establishing Extended Producer Responsibility (EPR) for waste electrical and electronic equipment (WEEE). Its primary purpose is to minimize e-waste environmental impacts through prevention, reuse, recycling, and recovery, applying open scope to all EEE since 2018 via six categories.

Key Components

**EPR frameworkProducers finance/organize collection, treatment.
**Collection targets65% average EEE placed on market or 85% WEEE generated.
**Treatment standardsSelective depollution (Annex II), storage (Annex III).
**ReportingHarmonized registration/reporting per national registers.
National enforcement with penalties.

Why Organizations Use It

Legal obligation for EU market access; reduces risks from illegal exports/hazards; enables critical raw material recovery; supports Green Deal circularity; builds stakeholder trust via compliance.

Implementation Overview

Multi-country registration, PRO membership, POM reporting, reverse logistics design. Applies to producers/importers EU-wide; complex for multinationals. No central certification; national audits/evidence retention required. Phased: gap analysis (0-3m), systems (3-12m), ongoing monitoring.

SQF Details

What It Is

Safe Quality Food (SQF) is a GFSI-benchmarked certification program administered by SQFI for food safety and quality across supply chains from farm to fork. It employs a HACCP-based, modular framework with universal system elements and sector-specific Good Practices.

Key Components

Modular structureModule 2 (System Elements)** for governance + modules like 11 for manufacturing GMPs.
Covers management commitment, HACCP Food Safety Plan, PRPs, verification, traceability, allergens, food defense.
Built on Codex/NACMCF HACCP; third-party audits with scoring (E:96-100, G:86-95, etc.).

Why Organizations Use It

Essential "license to trade" for retailers/brands.
Reduces recalls, aligns with FSMA/EU regs, cuts audit duplication.
Builds safety culture, supplier controls, resilience; boosts reputation.

Implementation Overview

Phased: gap analysis, documentation/training, internal audits, certification.
Applies to all sizes/sectors globally; requires annual audits, unannounced options.

Key Differences

Aspect	WEEE	SQF
Scope	EEE end-of-life management, collection, recycling, producer responsibility	Food safety management, HACCP, GMPs, quality systems
Industry	Electrical/electronic equipment manufacturers, EU-focused	Food manufacturing, storage, distribution, global applicability
Nature	Binding EU Directive, mandatory national transposition	Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification standard
Testing	National reporting, collection rate verification, no certification	Annual third-party audits, certification with scoring
Penalties	National fines, enforcement, market restrictions	Loss of certification, no legal penalties

Scope

WEEE

EEE end-of-life management, collection, recycling, producer responsibility

SQF

Food safety management, HACCP, GMPs, quality systems

Industry

WEEE

Electrical/electronic equipment manufacturers, EU-focused

SQF

Food manufacturing, storage, distribution, global applicability

Nature

WEEE

Binding EU Directive, mandatory national transposition

SQF

Voluntary GFSI-benchmarked certification standard

Testing

WEEE

National reporting, collection rate verification, no certification

SQF

Annual third-party audits, certification with scoring

Penalties

WEEE

National fines, enforcement, market restrictions

SQF

Loss of certification, no legal penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

Common questions about WEEE and SQF

WEEE FAQ

SQF FAQ

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

Transform your SOC into a service provider using maturity assessments to standardize workflows, guarantee SLOs, and ensure predictability amid turnover and risi

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Turn CIS Controls v8.1 into a cloud-first playbook for AWS, Azure, GCP & Microsoft 365. Get actionable IaaS/PaaS/SaaS safeguards, automation patterns, evidence

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

Unpack the true Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for compliance monitoring software. Factor in licenses, implementation, training, maintenance, and ROI savings for

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

100+ Standards & Regulations

AI-Powered Insights

Collaborative Assessments

Actionable Recommendations

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

DORA vs ENERGY STAR

DORA vs ENERGY STAR: Compare EU financial ICT resilience regs with US energy efficiency benchmarks. Key diffs, compliance tips & benefits for pros—boost resilience now!

PCI DSS vs ISO 27017

PCI DSS vs ISO 27017: Compare payment card security (12 reqs) with cloud controls (7 CLD). Key diffs in scope, shared resp, compliance. Choose right framework now!

WCAG vs ISO 41001

Compare WCAG vs ISO 41001: Web accessibility guidelines meet facility management standards. Unlock compliance strategies, key differences, and implementation tips for superior efficiency. Dive in now!

WEEE

SQF

Quick Verdict

WEEE

Key Features

SQF

Key Features

Detailed Analysis

WEEE Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

SQF Details

What It Is

Key Components

Why Organizations Use It

Implementation Overview

Key Differences

Scope

Industry

Nature

Testing

Penalties

Frequently Asked Questions

WEEE FAQ

What is the primary objective of WEEE?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with WEEE?

Does WEEE require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for WEEE be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with WEEE?

Can WEEE be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing WEEE?

SQF FAQ

What is the primary objective of SQF?

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with SQF?

Does SQF require an external audit or third-party certification?

How often should an assessment for SQF be performed?

What are the consequences of non-compliance with SQF?

An SQF be mapped to other international frameworks?

What is the first step to begin implementing SQF?

You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

The Service-Oriented SOC: Leveraging Maturity Assessments to Guarantee SLOs and Operational Predictability

CIS Controls v8.1 for Cloud & SaaS: A Practical Safeguard Playbook for AWS/Azure/GCP and Microsoft 365

Unpacking the True Cost: A Guide to Calculating TCO for Modern Compliance Monitoring Software

Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages

DORA vs ENERGY STAR

PCI DSS vs ISO 27017

WCAG vs ISO 41001