What is the primary objective of **SAFe**?

**The primary objective of SAFe is to scale Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises to achieve Business Agility by aligning strategy, execution, and operations.** SAFe, in version 6.0, integrates 10 immutable Lean-Agile principles (e.g., taking an economic view, applying systems thinking, organizing around value) with seven core competencies like Lean-Agile Leadership, Team and Technical Agility, and Lean Portfolio Management. It structures delivery via Agile Release Trains (**ARTs**) of 50-125 people operating in **Program Increments (PIs)** of 8-12 weeks, enabling faster time-to-market, improved quality, and employee engagement in software and IT environments.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **SAFe**?

**No organizations are legally required to comply with SAFe, as it is a voluntary framework for enterprise agility rather than a regulatory standard.** Professionally, large enterprises with hundreds of teams in software development and IT operations—such as those exceeding single-team Agile limits—adopt SAFe for scaling, with over 20,000 enterprises and 1 million certified practitioners worldwide. It suits firms needing portfolio-level governance, like those in regulated sectors embedding compliance via ARTs.

Does **SAFe** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**SAFe does not require external audits or third-party certification, relying instead on internal assessments and Scaled Agile, Inc. certifications.** Implementation uses self-assessments via maturity models and events like Inspect and Adapt workshops. Optional certifications (e.g., SAFe Agilist, RTE, SPC) from the SAFe Academy validate competencies, with Leading SAFe training as a common starting point for executives and teams.

How often should an assessment for **SAFe** be performed?

**SAFe assessments should be performed at the end of each Program Increment (PI), typically every 8-12 weeks, during Inspect and Adapt workshops.** Ongoing evaluations occur via PI Planning confidence votes, ROAM risk analysis on the Program Board, and metrics like flow and velocity. Annual maturity assessments, such as HCL-style models, baseline progress across competencies.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **SAFe**?

**Non-compliance with SAFe carries no legal penalties, as it is a non-mandatory framework, but results in business risks like siloed teams, delayed delivery, and missed agility gains.** Poor implementation leads to pitfalls such as 'SAFe washing' (superficial adoption), dependency chaos, and 30-70% transformation failure rates, yielding slower time-to-market and lower productivity compared to reported 30-75% improvements in successful cases.

Can **SAFe** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**SAFe can be mapped to other frameworks like Scrum, Kanban, LeSS, and DevOps, integrating them within its configurations.** Essential SAFe builds on team-level Scrum and Kanban; Large Solution and Portfolio levels extend to DAD or Spotify models via shared artifacts like backlogs and PIs. Tools like Jira Align facilitate hybrid mappings for flow and compliance.

What is the first step to begin implementing **SAFe**?

**The first step to implement SAFe is to train executives in Leading SAFe (SAFe Agilist certification) and conduct a value stream assessment.** Follow the SAFe Implementation Roadmap: identify value streams, form a Lean-Agile Center of Excellence (LACE), and launch with Essential SAFe for an initial ART, prioritizing leadership buy-in to avoid common pitfalls.

What is the primary objective of **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**The primary objective of MLPS 2.0 is to classify information systems into five protection levels based on potential harm to national security, social order, and public interests, ensuring commensurate technical, management, and governance controls.** Originating from China's 2017 Cybersecurity Law Article 21, it mandates graded protection for all network operators via standards like GB/T 22239-2019, covering cloud, IoT, big data, and industrial systems to prevent breaches and integrate cybersecurity into national stability.

Who is legally or professionally required to comply with **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**All network operators in mainland China, including domestic firms, foreign-invested enterprises, and multinationals with local systems, must comply with MLPS 2.0.** This encompasses operators of IT networks, cloud services, IoT, big data platforms, and industrial controls, enforced by Ministry of Public Security and local PSBs, with critical sectors like finance and energy facing heightened scrutiny.

Does **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** require an external audit or third-party certification?

**Yes, MLPS 2.0 requires external security reviews by licensed Chinese firms for Level 2 and above systems, with PSB approval and a minimum passing score of 75/100.** Level 1 relies on self-assessment; higher levels demand invasive audits covering technical controls, governance, and documentation, plus periodic re-evaluations.

How often should an assessment for **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** be performed?

**Assessments under MLPS 2.0 must occur biennially for Level 2, annually for Level 3, semi-annually for Level 4, and as mandated for Level 5, plus upon major system changes.** Self-inspections are continuous; external third-party evaluations and PSB verifications ensure ongoing compliance.

What are the consequences of non-compliance with **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**Non-compliance with MLPS 2.0 results in fines up to 100,000 yuan, operational suspensions, system shutdowns, and intensified PSB inspections.** Enforcement links certification to business license renewals; severe cases in sectors like finance have led to fines exceeding RMB 200 million.

Can **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)** be mapped to other international frameworks?

**Yes, MLPS 2.0 control domains—physical, network, data, operations, governance—map to ISO 27001 Annex A and NIST CSF categories.** Organizations leverage existing ISMS for gap analysis, extending Statements of Applicability to justify MLPS baselines while addressing China-specific elements like data localization.

What is the first step to begin implementing **MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)**?

**The first step is conducting a provisional self-assessment to classify systems into Levels 1-5 based on impact to national security, social order, and public interests.** Inventory assets, document rationale per GB/T 22239-2020, then file with local PSB within 30 days for Level 2+ systems.

SAFe vs MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Standards Comparison

SAFe

Voluntary

2023

Framework scaling Lean-Agile practices across enterprises

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Mandatory

N/A

China's mandatory graded cybersecurity protection framework

Quick Verdict

SAFe scales Agile for enterprise software agility worldwide voluntarily, while MLPS 2.0 mandates graded cybersecurity in China with PSB enforcement. Companies adopt SAFe for faster delivery; MLPS for legal compliance and network protection.

Agile Scaling

SAFe

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe 6.0)

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

High

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Agile Release Trains synchronize 50-125 members
Program Increments deliver value in 8-12 weeks
10 immutable Lean-Agile principles guide scaling
Seven core competencies foster Business Agility
Configurable levels from Essential to Full SAFe

Standard

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)

Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0

Cost

€€€€

Complexity

Medium

Implementation Time

12-18 months

Key Features

Five impact-based protection levels (1-5)
Mandatory classification and PSB registration
Graded technical controls for cloud/IoT/ICS
Governance, personnel, third-party management
Third-party audits and law enforcement oversight

Detailed Analysis

A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

SAFe Details

What It Is

Scaled Agile Framework (SAFe 6.0) is a comprehensive framework for scaling Lean-Agile practices across large enterprises. It integrates Agile, Lean, and systems thinking to align strategy, execution, and operations in complex software and IT environments. Primary purpose: achieve Business Agility through structured patterns for portfolios, programs, and teams.

Key Components

**Agile Release Trains (ARTs)50-125 cross-functional teams delivering value.
**10 Lean-Agile principlesEconomic view, systems thinking, value flow.
**Seven core competenciesLean-Agile Leadership, Team Agility, Portfolio Management.
**ConfigurationsEssential, Large Solution, Portfolio, Full.
Certification via Scaled Agile Academy (e.g., RTE, Agilist).

Why Organizations Use It

Drives faster time-to-market (20-50%), quality improvements, employee engagement. Enables compliance (GDPR, SOC 2) via embedded governance. Reduces risks through alignment; builds competitive agility and stakeholder trust in regulated industries.

Implementation Overview

Phased roadmap: value stream mapping, leadership training, ART launches. Key activities: PI Planning, Inspect & Adapt. Suits large enterprises in IT/software; global applicability. No formal certification required, but SPC coaching recommended. (178 words)

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme) Details

What It Is

MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme 2.0) is China's legally mandated cybersecurity framework under the 2017 Cybersecurity Law. It requires network operators to classify systems into five protection levels based on potential impact to national security and public interests, implementing graded technical, management, and physical controls.

Key Components

Core domains: physical security, network protection, data security, access control, monitoring, governance.
Standards like GB/T 22239-2019, GB/T 25070-2019 define baselines and extensions for cloud, IoT, ICS.
Built on impact-based classification; compliance via self-assessment, third-party audits (75/100 score), PSB approval.

Why Organizations Use It

Mandatory for China operations; avoids fines, suspensions.
Enhances resilience, aligns with data laws; builds regulator trust.
Competitive edge in procurement, risk reduction for multinationals.

Implementation Overview

Phased: scoping, classification, gap analysis, remediation, audits, ongoing re-evaluations.
Applies to all network operators in China; higher costs/audits for Level 3+.
Requires local PSB filing, periodic assessments (annual for Level 3).

Key Differences

Aspect	SAFe	MLPS 2.0 (Multi-Level Protection Scheme)
Scope	Scaling Agile for enterprise software/IT	Graded cybersecurity for all networks/systems
Industry	Software, IT ops worldwide, all sizes	All sectors in China, mandatory for operators
Nature	Voluntary framework with certifications	Mandatory regulation enforced by PSBs
Testing	PI planning, Inspect & Adapt workshops	Third-party audits, PSB reviews, periodic re-evals
Penalties	No legal penalties, implementation risks	Fines, suspensions, operational shutdowns