Standards Comparison

    SAMA CSF

    Mandatory
    2017

    Saudi Central Bank mandatory cybersecurity framework for finance

    VS

    CIS Controls

    Voluntary
    2021

    Prioritized cybersecurity framework reducing common attack surfaces

    Quick Verdict

    SAMA CSF mandates structured cybersecurity maturity for Saudi finance, while CIS Controls offer prioritized voluntary safeguards for all organizations. Saudi firms adopt SAMA for regulatory survival; global enterprises use CIS for efficient, scalable defense.

    Cybersecurity

    SAMA CSF

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework Version 1.0

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    6-12 months

    Key Features

    • Six-level maturity model mandating minimum Level 3
    • Board-level accountability with independent CISO requirement
    • Four core domains spanning governance to third-party security
    • Principle-based approach with compensating controls and waivers
    • Explicit alignment to NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS standards
    Cybersecurity

    CIS Controls

    CIS Critical Security Controls v8.1

    Cost
    €€€
    Complexity
    Medium
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 18 prioritized controls with 153 actionable safeguards
    • Implementation Groups IG1-IG3 for scalability
    • Derived from real-world attack data analysis
    • Maps to NIST CSF, PCI DSS, HIPAA frameworks
    • Free Benchmarks and tools for configuration hardening

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    SAMA CSF Details

    What It Is

    SAMA Cyber Security Framework (SAMA CSF) Version 1.0 is a mandatory regulatory framework issued by the Saudi Central Bank in 2017. It provides a principle-based, risk-driven blueprint for cybersecurity in Saudi financial institutions, covering governance, risk, operations, and third-party security with a six-level maturity model targeting at least Level 3.

    Key Components

    • Four domains: Leadership/Governance, Risk Management/Compliance, Operations/Technology, Third-Party Security.
    • 114+ sub-controls across 29 objectives in a 5-pillar structure.
    • Built on NIST, ISO 27001, PCI DSS; uses documentation pyramid (policy-standard-procedure).
    • Self-assessments and SAMA audits, no external certification.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mandatory for SAMA-regulated entities (banks, insurers, fintechs) to avoid fines, audits, license risks.
    • Enhances resilience, reduces breaches, supports Vision 2030 digital goals.
    • Builds board-level accountability, multi-framework reuse for efficiency.
    • Boosts stakeholder trust, competitive edge in Saudi finance.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: gap analysis, governance setup, control rollout, monitoring.
    • Applies to all regulated financial firms in Saudi Arabia.
    • Tools like GRC platforms (CyberArrow) aid evidence, KPIs/KRIs tracking; 6-12 months typical.

    CIS Controls Details

    What It Is

    CIS Critical Security Controls (CIS Controls) v8.1 is a community-driven, prescriptive cybersecurity framework of prioritized best practices to reduce cyber risks and enhance resilience. It targets common attack vectors through actionable safeguards, organized by Implementation Groups (IG1–IG3) for scalable adoption based on organizational maturity.

    Key Components

    • 18 Controls across asset management, access control, vulnerability management, logging, and incident response.
    • 153 Safeguards, with 56 in IG1 for basic hygiene.
    • Built on real-world attack data; maps to NIST, PCI DSS, HIPAA.
    • No formal certification; self-assessed compliance via tools like CIS RAM.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Mitigates 85% of common attacks, cuts breach costs.
    • Supports regulatory compliance, cyber insurance discounts.
    • Builds stakeholder trust, operational efficiency.
    • Enables competitive edge via prioritized resource allocation.

    Implementation Overview

    • **Phased roadmapGovernance, discovery, foundational controls (IG1: 3-9 months), expansion (IG2/IG3: 6-18 months).
    • Involves asset inventories, automation, metrics tracking.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries; free resources like Benchmarks aid rollout.
    • Ongoing audits, no mandatory external certification.

    Key Differences

    Scope

    SAMA CSF
    Financial sector cybersecurity domains, maturity model
    CIS Controls
    18 prioritized safeguards across all cyber defense areas

    Industry

    SAMA CSF
    Saudi financial institutions (banks, insurers, fintechs)
    CIS Controls
    All industries, organization sizes worldwide

    Nature

    SAMA CSF
    Mandatory regulatory framework with audits
    CIS Controls
    Voluntary prioritized best practices

    Testing

    SAMA CSF
    Periodic self-assessments, SAMA audits, maturity scoring
    CIS Controls
    Self-assessments via IG1-IG3, continuous tool-based testing

    Penalties

    SAMA CSF
    Fines, license revocation, operational restrictions
    CIS Controls
    No formal penalties, reputational/business risks

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about SAMA CSF and CIS Controls

    SAMA CSF FAQ

    CIS Controls FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages