Standards Comparison

    Six Sigma

    Voluntary
    1986

    De facto methodology for data-driven process improvement

    VS

    COBIT

    Voluntary
    2019

    Global framework for enterprise IT governance and management

    Quick Verdict

    Six Sigma drives process excellence via DMAIC and belts for any industry, while COBIT governs enterprise IT aligning strategy with objectives. Companies adopt Six Sigma for defect reduction and savings, COBIT for IT risk management and compliance.

    Process Improvement

    Six Sigma

    ISO 13053:2011 Six Sigma Quantitative Methods

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • Structured DMAIC methodology for existing processes
    • Professional belt hierarchy with Champions oversight
    • Data-driven statistical root cause verification
    • 3.4 defects per million opportunities benchmark
    • Tollgate governance and control plans sustainment
    IT Governance

    COBIT

    COBIT 2019 Governance and Management Objectives

    Cost
    €€€€
    Complexity
    High
    Implementation Time
    12-18 months

    Key Features

    • 40 objectives across 5 domains (EDM, APO, BAI, DSS, MEA)
    • 11 design factors for tailored governance systems
    • CMMI-based capability levels 0-5 for performance
    • Goals cascade aligns stakeholder needs to IT
    • Distinct separation of governance from management

    Detailed Analysis

    A comprehensive look at the specific requirements, scope, and impact of each standard.

    Six Sigma Details

    What It Is

    Six Sigma is a de facto industry standard and methodology, anchored by ISO 13053:2011, for quantitative process improvement through variation reduction and defect prevention. It employs a data-driven, statistical approach via DMAIC (Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, Control) for existing processes and DMADV for new designs, targeting 3.4 defects per million opportunities.

    Key Components

    • Structured DMAIC/DMADV phases with mandatory deliverables like Project Charters, SIPOC maps, and control plans.
    • Professional **belt systemChampions, Master Black Belts, Black Belts, Green Belts.
    • Statistical tools: MSA (Gage R&R), hypothesis testing, DOE, SPC.
    • Governance via tollgates, audits; certification via bodies like ASQ (experience + projects required).

    Why Organizations Use It

    Drives financial savings (e.g., Motorola $17B, GE $1B+), customer satisfaction, and risk reduction. Voluntary adoption yields competitive edges in quality, efficiency across industries like manufacturing, healthcare, finance. Builds stakeholder trust through proven, measurable outcomes.

    Implementation Overview

    Enterprise deployment starts with executive sponsorship, training belts, project selection via Hoshin Kanri. Key activities: tollgate reviews, pilots, sustainment via SOPs/SPC. Suits all sizes/industries; no formal certification mandatory but ASQ recommended for credibility. (178 words)

    COBIT Details

    What It Is

    COBIT 2019, or Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies, is a comprehensive IT governance and management framework developed by ISACA. Its primary purpose is to help organizations create value from IT, manage risks, and optimize resources through tailored governance systems. It uses a design-factor-driven approach with 11 factors for customization.

    Key Components

    • 40 governance and management objectives grouped into five domains: EDM (governance), APO, BAI, DSS, MEA.
    • Six governance system principles and seven components (processes, structures, etc.).
    • CMMI-based performance management with 0-5 capability levels.
    • No formal certification; compliance via self-assessments and audits.

    Why Organizations Use It

    • Aligns IT with business goals via goals cascade.
    • Supports compliance (SOX, GDPR) and risk management.
    • Enhances assurance, value delivery, and stakeholder trust.

    Implementation Overview

    • Phased: assessment, design, pilot, deploy, monitor.
    • Applies to all sizes/industries; training essential (Foundation, Design certificates).

    (178 words)

    Key Differences

    Scope

    Six Sigma
    Process improvement, defect reduction, DMAIC methodology
    COBIT
    IT governance, management objectives, EGIT across domains

    Industry

    Six Sigma
    All industries, manufacturing to services globally
    COBIT
    IT-heavy sectors, regulated enterprises worldwide

    Nature

    Six Sigma
    Voluntary methodology, belt certifications, no enforcement
    COBIT
    Voluntary framework, ISACA guidance, no legal enforcement

    Testing

    Six Sigma
    Project tollgates, capability analysis, belt exams
    COBIT
    Capability assessments (0-5 levels), maturity audits

    Penalties

    Six Sigma
    No penalties, project failure or certification loss
    COBIT
    No penalties, audit findings or governance gaps

    Frequently Asked Questions

    Common questions about Six Sigma and COBIT

    Six Sigma FAQ

    COBIT FAQ

    You Might also be Interested in These Articles...

    Run Maturity Assessments with GRADUM

    Transform your compliance journey with our AI-powered assessment platform

    Assess your organization's maturity across multiple standards and regulations including ISO 27001, DORA, NIS2, NIST, GDPR, and hundreds more. Get actionable insights and track your progress with collaborative, AI-powered evaluations.

    100+ Standards & Regulations
    AI-Powered Insights
    Collaborative Assessments
    Actionable Recommendations

    Check out these other Gradum.io Standards Comparison Pages